Journals / Social Sciences / 2015 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3

-

OPERASYONEL REKABET DEĞERLENDİRMESİ (OCRA) YÖNTEMİYLE MEVDUAT BANKALARININ ETKİNLİK ÖLÇÜMÜ

Pages
120–134
Publication Date
2015-07-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

If you look at every four years, it has been established that YK showed the highest performance

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The effective and efficient operation of deposit money banks, which are the most basic institutions of the financial system, is of great importance in terms of the profitability of the banking sector and the economy of the country.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Those that increase their efficiency by continuously improving the service quality will be always one step ahead in this race.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:If you look at every four years, it has been established that YK showed the highest performance
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2011-2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Operational Competitiveness Rating · OCRA · Etkinlik Ölçümü

Abstract

The effective and efficient operation of deposit money banks, which are the most basic institutions of the financial system, is of great importance in terms of the profitability of the banking sector and the economy of the country. Banks are financial institutions that mediate the conversion of savings into investment. There is a very serious competition among banks serving in the financial sector. Those that increase their efficiency by continuously improving the service quality will be always one step ahead in this race. Competitiveness Operational Rating (OCRA) is a relatively new method that can be quite useful in measuring the relative efficiencies in decision making units by using similar input to produce similar output. This study aims to develop a model for efficiency measurement based on OCRA to measure the effectiveness of the 32 commercial banks operating in Turkey using data for the years 2011-2014 taken from the “Book for Banks”. Input and output factors used in the model were determined according the results of a literature study. If you look at every four years, it has been established that YK showed the highest performance

Özet

Finansal sistemin en temel kurumları olan bankaların etkin ve verimli çalışması hem bankacılık sektörünün karlılığı hem de ülke ekonomisi açısından büyük önem taşımaktadır. Bankalar, tasarrufların yatırıma dönüştürülmesinde aracılık eden finansal kurumlardır. Finans sektöründe hizmet veren bankalar arasında çok ciddi rekabet söz konusudur. Hizmet kalitesini sürekli iyileştirerek verimliliğini artıran bankalar bu yarışta her zaman bir adım önde olacaktır. Operational Competitiveness Rating (OCRA), benzer girdiler kullanarak benzer çıktılar üreten karar verme birimlerinin göreli etkinlik ölçümünde kullanılan oldukça kullanışlı ve yeni sayılabilecek bir yöntemdir. Bu çalışma ile Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren 32 mevduat bankasının etkinliklerini ölçmek için 2011-2014 yıllarına ait "Bankalarımız Kitabından" alınan veriler kullanılarak OCRA yöntemine dayanan bir etkinlik ölçme model geliştirilmiştir. Modelde kullanılan girdi ve çıktı faktörleri literatür taraması sonucunda belirlenmiştir. Dört yılın tamamı dikkate alındığında en yüksek performansı Yapı ve Kredi Bankasının gösterdiği belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZBEK, A. (2015). -. Social Sciences, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3, 120–134. https://ajindex.com/articles/1006051

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akkoç, S. and Vatansever, K., (2013). Fuzzy performance evaluation with AHP and TOPSIS methods: evidence for Turkish banking sector after the global financial crisis. Eurasian J. Bus. Econ. Vol:6, Nr:11, pp:53–74 (Available at: http://www.ejbe.org/EJBE2013Vol06No11p053AKKOC-VATANSEVER.pdf).
  2. Ayadi, I. and Ellouze, A., (2013). Market Structure and Performance of Tunisian Banks. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Vol:3, Nr:2, pp:345-354. Bankalarımız 2011, Yayın No:284, G.M. Matbacılık ve Ticaret A.Ş. İstanbul, Mayıs 2012. Bankalarımız 2012, Yayın No:294, G.M. Matbacılık ve Ticaret A.Ş. İstanbul, Mayıs 2013. Bankalarımız 2013, Yayın No:304, G.M. Matbacılık ve Ticaret A.Ş. İstanbul, Mayıs 2014. Bankalarımız 2014, Yayın No:311, G.M. Matbacılık ve Ticaret A.Ş. İstanbul, Mayıs 2015.
  3. Bauer, P.W., Berger, A.N., Ferrier, G.D., and Humphrey, D.B., (1998). Consistency conditions for regulatory analysis of financial institutions: A comparison of frontier efficiency methods. Journal of Economic and Business, Vol:50, Nr:2, pp:85–114.
  4. Bayyurt, N., (2013). Ownership Effect on Bank's Performance: Multi Criteria Decision Making Approaches on Foreign and Domestic Turkish Banks. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 99: 919-928.
  5. Beccalli, E., Casu, B., and Girardone, C., (2006). Efficiency and stock performance in european banking. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol:33, Br:1-2, pp:245–262.
  6. Berger, A.N. and Humphrey, D.B., (1997). Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research, Nr:98, pp:175-212.
  7. Camanho, A.S. and Dyson, R.G., (2006). Data envelopment analysis and Malmquist indices for measuring performance. Journal of Productivity Analysis Nr:26, pp:35–49.
  8. Che, Z.H.,Wang, H.S., and Chuang, C.L., (2010). A fuzzy AHP and DEA approach for marketing bank loan decisions for small and medium enterprises in Taiwan. Expert Syst. Appl., Vol:37, Nr:10, pp:7189–7199.
  9. Chen, Y.C., Chiu, Y.H., Huang, C.W., and Tu, C.H., (2013). The analysis of bank business performance and market risk — applying fuzzy DEA. Economic modeling, Nr:32, pp:225–232. http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.02.008. Chitan, G., (2012). Corporate governance and bank performance in the Romanian banking sector. Procedia Economics and Finance, Nr:3,pp:549-554.
  10. Colwell, R.J. and Davis, E.P., (1992). Output and productivity in banking. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Nr:94, pp:111-1