Journals / Sağlık Bilimleri ve Meslekleri Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

-

Serebral Parezide Gözlemsel Yürüme Analizinin Yeri ve Kullanılabilirliği

Pages
28–45
Publication Date
2015-04-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The review results showed that clinically available methods have moderate level reliability for between rater reliability and moderate to advance level reliability for within rater reliability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Gait is a complex sequence of movements so that it is very hard to analyze in clinic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The review results showed that clinically available methods have moderate level reliability for between rater reliability and moderate to advance level reliability for within rater reliability.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review suggested that between rater reliability is high enough to use it in clinical practice but within rater reliability needs to be improved by the feature studies
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yürüme analizi · klinik değerlendirme · Serebral palsi

Abstract

Gait is a complex sequence of movements so that it is very hard to analyze in clinic. Children with cerebral palsy have lots of different type of gait abnormalities. There is no clinically satisfied and reliable gait assessment tool for analyzing gait problem in cerebral palsy. The purpose of the review was to determine the reliability of clinically available video based observational gait analysis on children with spastic hemiplegics and diplegics and to investigate how they can be used in clinical practice as a standard examination tool. The review results showed that clinically available methods have moderate level reliability for between rater reliability and moderate to advance level reliability for within rater reliability. This review suggested that between rater reliability is high enough to use it in clinical practice but within rater reliability needs to be improved by the feature studies

Özet

Yürüme karmaşık hareketler sinsilesi olduğundan klinikte anliz edilmesi güçtür. Serebral Palsili (SP) çocuklarda pek çok çeşit yürüme problemi görülür. Neyazık ki klinikte SP’li çocukların değişik yürüme problemlerini inceleyecek tatmin edici güvenilirliğe sahip bir yürüme değerlendirme aracı bulunmamaktadır. Bu derlemenin amacı, spastik hemiparezi ve diparezili çocuklarda video bazlı gözlemsel yürüme analiz’nın (VBGYA) güvenilirliğinin nasıl değerlendirilmesi gerektiği ve bu değerlendime aracının günümüzdeki durumuyla klinikte kullanılamaya uygun olup olmadığını tartışmak, limitasyonlarını incelemektir. Karşılaştırma ve detaylı derleme sonuçlarına göre günümüzde video bazlı gözlemsel yürüme analizi metotları orta seviyede gözlemciler arası güvenilirliğe ve orta-ileri düzeyde gözlemci içi güvenilirliğe sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Sonuç olarak gözlemci içi güvenilirlik VBGYA’nin klinikte kullanılabileceğini, ancak gözlemciler arası güvnilirliğin yükseltilmesi için çalışılması gerektiği ortaya konmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKALAN, N. E., TEMELLİ, Y. (2015). -. Sağlık Bilimleri ve Meslekleri Dergisi, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 28–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/1004948

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Silva M, Shepherd EF, Jackson WO, Dorey FJ, Schmalzried TP. [Average patient walking activity approaches 2 million cycles per year: pedometers under-record walking activity]. J. Arthroplasty. 2002; 17(6):693-7.
  2. Sequeira MM, Rickenbach M, Wietlisbach V, Tullen B, Schutz Y. [Physical activity assessment using a pedometer and its comparison with a questionnaire in a large population survey]. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142(9):989-99.
  3. Perry, J. Fundimentals In: Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function, 1.ed. New York; SLACK Incorporated, 1992, p. 1-19. Akalan N.E. 1999. Serebral parezili çocuklarda video bazlı gözlemsel yürüme analizinin gözlemci içi ve gözlemciler arası güvenilirliğinin belirlenmesi • Istanbul Universitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Ens. Yüksek lisans Tezi. 79773. Maluin F: Observational Gait Analysis. In: Rebecca L. Craik, Carol A. Oatis, Gait Analysis, Theory and Application, 1.ed, Pennsylvania, Mosby, 1995. p.113-123. Reimers J. [A scoring system for the evaluation of ambulation in cerebral palsied patients]. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1972;14(3):332-5. Nelson AJ.[ Functional ambulation profile]. Phys Ther. 1974;54(10):1059-65.
  4. Olney SJ, Write MJ: Cerebral Palsy. In Campbell S K, Linden DWV, Palsido RJP: Physical Therapy For Children. Londra, 2. ed. W.B. Sounders Company, 1995: p.489-525.
  5. Wolfson L, Whipple, Amerman P.Tobin J.N. [Gait assessment in the Elderely: A gait abnormality rating scale and its relation to falls], Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences 1990; 45(1): 12-19.
  6. Krebs D. E. Edelstein J.E, Fishman S. [Reliability of observational gait analysis]. Physical Therapy, 1985; 65(7): 1027-33. Maathuis KG, van der Schans CP, van Iperen A, Rietman HS, Geertzen JH. [Gait in children with cerebral palsy: observer reliability of Physician Rating Scale and Edinburgh Visual Gait Analysis Interval Testing scale]. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005; 25(3):268-72.
  7. Caroll NC, Jones D, Maschuich W. [Evaluations patients to the gait children with miyelomeningocele]. Prostet. Orthot. Int.1982; 6:27-34. de Bruin H, Russell DJ, Latter JE, Sadler JT.[Angle-angle diagrams in monitoring and quantification of gait patterns for children with cerebral palsy]. Am J Phys Med. 1982;61(4):176-92. Goodkin R Diller L. [Reliability among physical therapistsin diagnosis and treatment of gait deviationin hemiplegics]. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1991; 37:727-734.
  8. Robinson JL, Smidth GL. [Quantitative gait evaluation in clinic]. Physical Therapy 1981;61: 351-353.
  9. Patla AE, Clouse SD.[V