Journals / Medical Science and Discovery / 2017 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 5

Evaluation of factors that affecting mortality in urgent redo-laparotomies

Pages
35–43
Publication Date
2017-05-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, the surgeon should also make the UARLs decision at the right time.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the factors that affect mortality in patients undergoing Urgent abdominal redo-laparatomies (UARLs) and to analyze the common indications and operative,demograhic and clinical characteristics in UARLs.Material and Methods: Our study was designed as a retrospective, observational and multi-centric study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 155 patients from two separate clinics undergoing urgent, unplanned redo-laparatomy were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, the surgeon should also make the UARLs decision at the right time.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Urgent · redo-laparatomy · mortality

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the factors that affect mortality in patients undergoing Urgent abdominal redo-laparatomies (UARLs) and to analyze the common indications and operative,demograhic and clinical characteristics in UARLs.Material and Methods: Our study was designed as a retrospective, observational and multi-centric study. A total of 155 patients from two separate clinics undergoing urgent, unplanned redo-laparatomy were included in the study. The data obtained from all clinics were collected and and the relations of the demographic, clinical and operational factors with the mortalities of primary surgery and multiple UARLs were analyzed.Results: Mortality was observed in 42 (27%) patients. The most frequent causes of mortality were sepsis and multi-system organ failure in 23 (53.4%) patients. The relationships between the number of redo-laparotomy presence of blood transfusion, older age,classification of surgery and mortality were significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: Sepsis and multi-organ failure were the most frequent cause of mortality in our study as well, with a rate of 53.4 %. No significant relationship was observed between mortality and initial surgery under emergency conditions and presence of comorbidity. Redolaparatomies inevitable in some clinical situations. Since multiple redolaparatomies are associated with mortality , it is necessary to avoid complications during initial surgery to reduce UARLs. Major surgery operation UARLs in elderly people should be avoided. Finally, the surgeon should also make the UARLs decision at the right time.

🔖

Cite This Article

UYSAL, E., TUREL, K., SEZGİN, E. (2017). Evaluation of factors that affecting mortality in urgent redo-laparotomies. Medical Science and Discovery, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 5, 35–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/1003052

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Koirala R, Mehta N, Varma V, Kapoor S, Kumaran V, Nundy S. Urgent Redo-Laparotomies: Patterns and Outcome-A Single Centre Experience. Indian J Surg. 2015;77:195-9
  2. Haluk RU, Erdinc K, Haldun K, Ahmet B, Mustafa P, Mehmet AO. Urgent abdominal re-explorations. World J Emerg Surg. 2006;1:10
  3. Pusajó JF, Bumaschny E, Doglio GR, Cherjovsky MR, Lipinszki AI, Hernández MS, et al. Postoperative intra-abdominal sepsis requiring reoperation. Value of a predictive index. Arch Surg. 1993;128:218-22
  4. Fry DE, Garrison RN, Neitsch RC, Calhoun K, Polk HC. Determinants of death in patients with intra-abdominal abscess. Surgery1980; 88:517-523
  5. Christou NV, Barie PS, Dellinger EP, Waymack JP, Harlan H. Surgical Infection Society Intra-abdominal Infection Study. Arch Surg. 1993;128:193-199
  6. Butler JA, Huang J, Wilson SE. Repeated laparotomy for postoperative intra-abdominal sepsis. An analysis of outcome predictors. Arch Surg. 1987;122:702-6
  7. Ching SS, Muralikrishnan VP, Whiteley GS. Relaparotomy: a fiveyear review of indications and outcome. Int J Clin Pract. 2003; 57:333-337
  8. Hinsdale JG, Jaffe BM. Re-operation for intra-abdominal sepsis. Indications and results in modern critical care setting. Ann Surg. 1984;199:31-6
  9. Nakayama Y, Konishi M, Gotohda N, Kato Y, Aizawa H, Kudo M, et al. Comparison of postoperative early and late complications between pancreas-sparing duodenectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Today. 2016; doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1418-1
  10. Loveček M, Skalický P, Köcher M, Černá M, Prášil V, Holusková I, et al. Postpancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH), prevalence, diagnosis and management. Rozhl Chir. 2016;95:350-357
  11. Teichmann W, Wittmann DH, Andreone PA. Scheduled reoperations (etappenlavage) for diffuse peritonitis. Arch Surg. 1986;121:147-52
  12. Sautner T, Gotzinger P, Redl-Wenzel EM, Dittrich K, Felfernig M, Sporn P, et al. Does reoperation for abdominal sepsis enhance the inflammatory host response? Arch Surg. 1997;132:250-5
  13. Wittmann DH, Aprahamian C, Bergstein JM. Planned relaparotomy: advanced diffuse peritonitis managed by planned multiple laparotomies utilizing zippers, slide fastener, and Velcro analogue for temporary abdominal closure. World J Surg. 1990;14:218-26
  14. Billing A, Frohlich D, Mialkowskyi O, Stokstad P, Schildberg FW. Treatment of peritonitis with staged lavage: prognostic criteria and course of treatment. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1992;377:305-13
  15. Nathens AB, Rotstein OD, Marshall JC. Tertiary pe