Dergiler / Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 31 Issue: 3

Innovation Shaping the Future: The Relationship Between Innovative Behavior and Vision About the Future Among Sports Management Students

Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-09-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the relationship between innovative behaviors and future visions of sports management students. The research was conducted within the framework of a relational survey model and was carried out using data obtained from 215 students (90 female, 125 male) studying in the Eastern Anatolia Region of Türkiye. The Personal Information Form, the Innovative Behavior Scale, and the Visions about Future Scale were used as data acquisition tools. The data were analyzed using SPSS, AMOS, and JAMOVI software, and following descriptive statistics and tests of normality, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), reliability, and validity analyses were conducted. The relationships among the variables were examined using Pearson correlation analysis, and the theoretical model was tested using structural equation modeling (SEM). The findings of the structural equation model indicate that innovative behavior is positively associated with optimism and hope, and negatively associated with pessimism. The results of the structural equation model indicate that innovative behavior was positively associated with optimism and hope and negatively associated with pessimism. In conclusion, it has been found that as the level of innovative behavior increases, students develop a more hopeful and optimistic vision of the future. This finding highlights the importance of developing innovation-oriented competencies in sports management education.

Anahtar kelimeler
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Durmuş, G., Doğan, P. K. (2026). Innovation Shaping the Future: The Relationship Between Innovative Behavior and Vision About the Future Among Sports Management Students. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 31 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.53434/gbesbd.1940959

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

↗Yeni Sekme

PDF belgesi yükleniyor...

Kaynakça (53)

  1. Akbay, L. (2019). İlişkisel araştırmalar. S. Şen ve İ. Yıldırım (Eds.), Eğitimde araştırma yöntemleri (ss. 117–136). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  2. Akça, M. Ş., Korkmaz, O., & Alkal, A. (2018). Gelecek vizyonları ölçeği Türkçe formu geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kariyer Psikolojik Danışmanlığı Dergisi, 1(1), 1-21. https://izlik.org/JA64ZM78DU
  3. Artun, S. (2025). Çevik liderlik ve çalışanların yenilikçi davranışının kriz yönetimi üzerindeki etkisi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi.
  4. Aydoğdu, F. (2023). AVE ve CR hesaplama sistemi. https://www.fuataydogdu.com/avecr
  5. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  6. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge. Çalışkan, A., Akkoç, İ., & Turunç, Ö. (2019). Yenilikçi davranış: Bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 5(1), 94-111. https://doi.org/10.29131/uiibd.562196
  7. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2014). Dispositional optimism. Trends in cognitive sciences, 18(6), 293-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.003
  8. De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x
  9. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage.
  10. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/315131
  11. Gallagher, M. W., & Lopez, S. J. (Eds.). (2017). The Oxford handbook of hope. Oxford University Press.
  12. Ginevra, M. C., Pallini, S., Vecchio, G. M., Nota, L., & Soresi, S. (2016). Future orientation and attitudes mediate career adaptability and decidedness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95, 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.08.003
  13. Güneşlice, A., Arguz, M., Gök, Ö., & Güneşlice, B. (2024). Üniversite öğrencilerinin gelecek vizyonları ile kariyer uyumları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Kahramanmaraş İstiklal Üniversitesi Psikoloji Dergisi (KİÜ), 2(2), 25-42. https://izlik.org/JA37ES27PR
  14. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
  15. Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018556
  16. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  17. Hirschi, A. (2014). Hope as a resource for self-directed career management: Investigating mediating effects on proactive career behaviors and life and job satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(6), 1495-1512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9488-x
  18. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
  19. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  20. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
  21. Karabulut, E. O., Karacan Doğan, P., & Durmuş, G. (2024). Spor bilimleri eğitimi alan öğrencilerin girişimcilik ve problem çözme becerilerinin incelenmesi. Eurasian Research in Sport Science, 9(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.29228/ERISS.45
  22. Karademir, M., & Karakaya, Y. E. (2024). Spor eğitimi alan öğrencilerin geleceğe ilişkin tutumlarının araştırılması. Eğitimde Yeni Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 7(2), 228-242. https://doi.org/10.70325/eyyad.1574523
  23. Karasar, N. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar-ilkeler-teknikler. Nobel.
  24. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
  25. Konuk, M. (2025). The role of hope in university students' career transitions. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 12(1), 75-87.
  26. Korkmaz, O. (2023). Visions about future: Hope, optimism, and pessimism as predictor of university students’ proactive career behavior. International Academic Social Resources Journal, 8(45), 1914-1922. https://doi.org/10.29228/ASRJOURNAL.67583
  27. Kwon, K., & Kim, T. (2020). An integrative literature review of employee engagement and innovative behavior: Revisiting the JD-R model. Human Resource Management Review, 30(2), 100704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100704
  28. Lucke, J. F. (2005). The α and the ω of congeneric test theory: An extension of reliability and internal consistency to heterogeneous tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29(1), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621604270882
  29. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., & Peschar, J. L. (2006). OECD’s brief self-report measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6(4), 311–360. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0604_1
  30. Montani, F., Vandenberghe, C., Khedhaouria, A., & Courcy, F. (2020). Examining the inverted U-shaped relationship between workload and innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement and mindfulness. Human Relations, 73(1), 59-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718819055
  31. Newman, A., Ucbasaran, D., Zhu, F. E. I., & Hirst, G. (2014). Psychological capital: A review and synthesis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(1), 120-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1916
  32. Patton, W., Bartrum, D. A., & Creed, P. A. (2004). Gender differences for optimism, self-esteem, expectations and goals in predicting career planning and exploration in adolescents. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 4(2), 193-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-005-1745-z
  33. Peng, P., Song, Y., & Yu, G. (2021). Cultivating proactive career behavior: The role of career adaptability and job embeddedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 603890. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.603890
  34. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  35. Rand, K. L., Shanahan, M. L., Fischer, I. C., & Fortney, S. K. (2020). Hope and optimism as predictors of academic performance and subjective well-being in college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 81, 101906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101906
  36. Santilli, S., Marcionetti, J., Rochat, S., Rossier, J., & Nota, L. (2017). Career adaptability, hope, optimism, and life satisfaction in Italian and Swiss adolescents. Journal of Career Development, 44(1), 62-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845316633793
  37. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
  38. Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L.A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763-1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864
  39. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
  40. Seginer, R. (2009). Future orientation: Developmental and ecological perspectives. Springer.
  41. Shir, N., Nikolaev, B. N., & Wincent, J. (2019). Entrepreneurship and well-being: The role of psychological autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(5), 105875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.05.002
  42. Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ekinoks Yayıncılık.
  43. Snyder, C. R. (Ed.). (2000). Handbook of hope: Theory, measures, and applications. Academic Press.
  44. Sun, R. C., & Shek, D. T. (2012). Positive youth development, life satisfaction and problem behaviour among Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong: A replication. Social Indicators Research, 105, 541-559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9786-9
  45. Taati Jeliseh, M., Koleini, N., Zohrabi, M., & Xodabande, I. (2025). Examining the contributions of hope and optimism to teacher wellbeing and burnout through a structural equation modeling analysis. Discover Psychology, 5(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-025-00454-0
  46. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson.
  47. Tavşancıl, E. (2014). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi (5. baskı). Nobel.
  48. Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a model of explaining teachers’ innovative behavior: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 430-471. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314557949
  49. Topçu, M. K., Gürsoy, A., & Gürson, P. (2015). The role of the servant leadership on the relation between ethical climate perception and innovative work. European Research Studies Journal, 18(1), 67-80.
  50. Tunca, N. (2012). İlköğretim öğretmenleri için mesleki değerler ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi ve ilköğretim öğretmenlerinin mesleki değerlerinin belirlenmesi (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Anadolu Üniversitesi.
  51. Turgut, E., & Beğenirbaş, M. (2013). Çalışanların yenilikçi davranışları üzerinde sosyal sermaye ve yenilikçi iklimin rolü: Sağlık sektöründe bir araştırma. Kara Harp Okulu Bilim Dergisi, 23(2), 101-124.
  52. Ulusal, E., & Yüreğir, O. (2020). Yenilikçi iş davranışını belirleyen faktörlerin ağırlıklandırılması. Endüstri Mühendisliği, 31, 17-31.
  53. Yüksel, O. (2024). Sağlık kurumları işletmeciliği öğrencilerinin bireysel yenilikçilik algıları ile olumlu gelecek beklentileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(1), 249-264. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.1418427