KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

The Democratic Deficit and the European Transparency Initiative

Dilek Yiğit

Sayfa
109–143
Yayın Tarihi
2009-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗

Özet

Supranasyonel bir kurulu olan Avrupa Birli i’nin karar organlarõnõn, büyük ölçüde temsili demokrasiye istinat etmiyor olmasõ, Birli in karar-alma mekanizmasõnõn demokratik kalitesi ve Birli in me ruiyeti konusunda kaygõlara neden olmaktadõr. Bu makale, Avrupa Birli i’nde demokrasi açõ õnõn nedenleri üzerinde dururken, Avrupa "effaflõk Giri imi’nin, demokrasi açõ õ sorununu ne ölçüde çözebilece ini analiz etmektedir

Abstract

Because the European Union as a supranational organisation is not predominantly based on representative mechanism there have been concerns about democratic quality of its decision-making process and legitimacy of its political order. This paper discusses why the European Union suffers from a democratic deficit and to what extent the European Transparency Initiative succesfully addresses the democratic deficit in the Union

Anahtar kelimeler
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yiğit, D. (2009). The Democratic Deficit and the European Transparency Initiative. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 109–143. https://ajindex.com/articles/1067913

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

↗Yeni Sekme

PDF belgesi yükleniyor...

Kaynakça (77)

  1. K. A. ARMSTRONG, “Rediscovering Civil Society: The European Union and the White Paper on Governance”, European Law Journal, Vol.8, No.1, pp.102-132
  2. T. AUBERGER, K. ISZKOWSKI, “Democratic Theory and the European Union: Focusing on “Interest” or “Reason”?”Journal of European Integration, Vol.29, No.3, pp. 271-284, 2007
  3. G. BAKER, “Civil Society and Democracy:The Gap Between Theory and Possibility”, Politics, 18 (2), pp.81-87, 1998
  4. R. BELLAMY, A. WARLEIGH (eds.), Citizenship and Governance in the European Union, Continuum, London, 2001
  5. S. BORRAS, T. CONZELMANN, “Democracy, Legitimacy and Soft Modes of Governance in the EU:The Empirical Turn, Journal of European Integration, Vol.29,No.5, pp.531-543, 2007
  6. H. CATT, Democracy in Practice, London, Routledge, 1999
  7. D. CHALMERS et al., European Union Law, the United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, 2006
  8. S. CHAMBERS, “Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation”, The Journal of Political Philosophy, Volume 12, Number 4, p.389-410, 2004
  9. M. CINI, “European Commission reform and the origins of the European Transparency Initiative”, Journal of European Public Policy, 15:5, p.743-760, 2008
  10. C. CROMBEZ, “Legislative Procedures in the European Community”, British Journal of Political Science, Vol.26, No.2, p.199-228, 1996
  11. P.J.CONGE, “Review: The Concept of Political Participation: Toward a Definition”, Comparative Politics, Vol.20, No.2, p.241-249, 1988
  12. O. COSTA et.al., “Introduction: Diffuse control mechanisms in the European Union:towards a new democracy?”, Journal of European Public Policy, 10:5, p.666-676, 2003
  13. R.A.DAHL, “Pluralism Revisited”, Comparative Politics, Vol.10, No.2, p.191-203, 1978
  14. R.A. DAHL, Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy, Yale University Pres, 1982
  15. R.A. DAHL, “A Democratic Dilemma: System Effectiveness versus Citizen Participation”, Political Science Quarterly, Vol.109, No.1, p.23-34, 1994
  16. O. DE SCHUTTER, “Europe in Search of its Civil Society”, European Law Journal, Vol.8, No.2, p.198-217, 2002
  17. R. EISING, “Interest Groups and the European Union”, in European Union Politics, 2 nd. ed. Michelle Cini, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p.202-221, 2007
  18. E.O. ERIKSEN, “Deliberative Supranationalism in the EU” in Democracy In The European Union: Integration Through Deliberation, ed. E. O. Eriksen and J.E. Fossum, London, Routledge, p.42-64, 2000
  19. E.O. ERIKSEN, J. E. FOSSUM, “Post-national Integration”, in Democracy In The European Union: Integration Through Deliberation, ed. E. O. Eriksen and J.E. Fossum, London, Routledge, p.1-28, 2000
  20. E.O. ER KSEN, J. E. FOSSUM, “Democracy through Strong Publics in the European Union?”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol.40, No.3, p.401-424, 2002
  21. E.O. ER KSEN, J. E. FOSSUM, “Europe in Search of Legitimacy: Strategies of Legitimation Assessed”, International Political Science Review, 25, p.435-459
  22. J. ELSTER, “Introduction: Historical Background” in Deliberative Democracy ed. J. Elster, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, p.1-18, 1998
  23. J.D. FEARON, “Deliberation and Discussion” in Deliberative Democracy, ed. J. Elster, United Kingdom,Cambridge University Press, p.44-68, 1998
  24. J.S.FISHKIN, Democracy and Deliberation, USA, Yale University Press, 1991
  25. A. FOLLESDAL, “Survey Article:The Legitimacy Deficits of the European Union”, The Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol.14, No.4, p.441-468, 2006
  26. A. FOLLESDAL, S. HIX, “Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravscik”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol.44, No.3, p.533-562, 2006
  27. D. FRIEDRICH, Old Wine in New Bottles?:The Actual and Potential Contribution of Civil Society Organizations to Democratic Governance in Europe, Reconstituting Democracy in Europe Working Paper 2007/08, 2007, www.reconproject.eu, accessed on 04.07.2008
  28. R. GARGARELLA, “Full Representation, Deliberation, and Impartiality”, in Deliberative Democracy, ed. J. Elster, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, p.260-280, 1998
  29. J. GREENWOOD, Interest Representation In The European Union, 2nd ed., New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007
  30. S. GREWAL, “The Paradox of Integration: Habermas and the Unfinished Project of European Union”, Politics, Vol 21(2), p.114-123, 2001
  31. A. GUTMANN, D. THOMPSON, Democracy and disagreement. Why moral conflict can not be avoided in politics, and what should be done about it, Cambridge Mass., Harvard University Press, 1996
  32. A. GUTMANN, D. THOMPSON, Why Deliberative Democracy, Princeton, Princeton University Pres, 2004
  33. J. HABERMAS, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge, MIT Pres, 1996
  34. P. HIRST, From Statism to Pluralism, London, UCL Press, 1997
  35. S. HIX, “Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses”, European Journal of Political Research, Vol.35, no.1, p. 69-106, 1999
  36. R. HOLZHACKER, “Democratic Legitimacy and the European Union”, Journal of European Integration, 29:3, p.257-269, 2007
  37. E. HUBER et al., “The Paradoxes of Contemporary Democracy: Formal, Participatory, and Social Dimensions”, Comparative Politics, vol.29, no.3, p.323-342, 1997
  38. M. JACHTENFUCHS et al., “Which Europe? Conflicting Models of a Legitimate European Political Order”, European Journal of International Relations, vol.4, no.4, p.409-445, 1998
  39. H. KASSIM, D. G. DIMITRAKOPOULOS, “The Commission and the Future of Europe”, Journal of European Public Policy, 14:8, p.1249-1270, 2007
  40. R.S. KATZ, “Models of Democracy: Elite Attitudes and the Democratic Deficit in the European Union”, European Union Politics, 2; 53, p.53-79, 2001
  41. J. KNIGHT, J. JOHNSON, “Aggregation and Deliberation: On the Possibility of Democratic Legitimacy”, Political Theory, Vol.22, No.2, p. 277-296, 1994
  42. C. LORD, P. MAGNETTE, “E Pluribus Unum? Creative Disagreement about Legitimacy in the EU”, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol.42, no.1, p.183-202, 2004
  43. J.R. LUCAS, Democracy and Participation, England, Penquin Books, 1976
  44. P. MAGNETTE, European Governance and Civic Participation: Can the European Union be politicised?, This paper is a part of contributions to the Jean Monnet Working Paper No.6/01, 2001
  45. P. MAGNETTE, “European Governance and Civic Participation: Beyond Elitist Citizenship?”, Political Studies, 51, p.144-160, 2003
  46. P. MAIR, Popular Democracy and the European Union Polity, European Governance Papers, No.C-05-03, 2005, http://www.connex-network.org/pdf/egp- connex-C-05-03.pdf, accessed on 07.07.2008.
  47. G. MAJONE, “The European Community: An ‘Independent Fourth Branch of Government’?”, EUI Working Paper SPS No. 94/17, Florence, European University Institute, 1993
  48. G. MAJONE, “Europe’s Democratic Deficit: The Questions of Standards”, European Law Journal, vol.4, no.1, p.5-28, 1998
  49. G. MAJONE, “The Credibility Crisis of Community Regulation”, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol.38, no.2, p.273-302, 2000
  50. B. MANIN et al, “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation”, Political Theory, vol.15, no.3, p.338-368, 1987
  51. J. G. MARCH, J. P. OLSEN, Democratic Governance, New York, The Free Press
  52. A. MCGANN, The Logic of Democracy: Reconciling Equality, Deliberation, and Minority Protection, USA, The University of Michigan, 2006
  53. I. MICHALOWITZ, “Analysing Structured Paths of Lobbying Behaviour: Why Discussing the Involvement of Civil Society Does not solve the EU’s Democratic Deficit”, European Integration, vol.26, no.2, p.145-170, 2004
  54. J. S. MILL, Considerations on Representative Government, South Bend, Gateway
  55. A. MORAVCSIK, “In Defense of the Democratic Deficit”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), p.603-624, 2002
  56. D. NAURIN, “Why increasing transparency in the European Union will not make lobbyists behave any better than they already do”, European Union Studies Association EUSA, Biennial Conference, Austin, Texas, 2005
  57. K. NEUNREITHER, “Political Representation in the European Union: a common whole, various wholes, or just a hole?” in European Integration after Amsterdam, ed. K. Neunreither and A. Wiener, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000
  58. J. NEYER, “The Deliberative Turn In Integration Theory”, Journal of European Public Policy, 13:5, p. 779-791, 2006
  59. D. I. PIETRZYK, “Democracy or Civil Society”, Politics, Vol 23(1), p.38-45, 2003
  60. B. ROSAMOND, “New Theories of European Integration”, in European Union Politics 2 nd. ed. Michelle Cini, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p.117-136, 2007
  61. C. F. SABEL, J. ZEITLIN, Learning from Difference:The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the European Union, European Governance Papers network.org/eurogov/pdf/egp-connex-C-07-02.pdf, accessed on 07.07.2008. No. C-07-02, 2007, http://www.connex
  62. F. W. SCHARPF, Governing in Europe:Effective and Democratic?, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999
  63. S. K. SCHMIDT, “Only an Agenda Setter?:The European Commission’s Power over the Council of Ministers”, European Union Politics, 1:37, p.37-61, 2000
  64. P. C. SCHMITTER, What Is There To Legitimize In The European Union...And How Might This Be Accomplished?, This paper is a part of contributions to the Jean Monnet Working Paper No.6/01, 2001
  65. A. SLOAT, “The Preparation of the Governance White Paper”, Politics, Vol 23(2), p.128-136, 2003
  66. E. VINK, “Multi-level Democracy: Deliberative or Agonistic? The Search for Appropriate Normative Standards”, Journal of European Integration, vol.29, no.3, p.303-322, 2007
  67. A. WEALE, “Democratic Theory and the Constitutional Politics of the European Union”, Journal of European Public Policy, 4(4), p 665-669, 1997
  68. A. WEALE, Democracy, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
  69. A. WEALE, New Governance and Public Reasoning-Towards a Better Quality of EU Deliberation, New Government Policy Brief 19, 2008
  70. J. H. H WEILER et al., European Democracy and Its Critique Five Uneasy Pieces, EUI Working Paper RSC No.95/11, 1995 Official Documents
  71. Commission of the European Communities, 2001, European Governance: A White Paper, COM (2001) 428 final, Brussels.
  72. Commission of the European Communities, 2002, Communication From The Commission:Towards a reinforced culture of consultation and dialogue – General principles and minimum standards for consultation of interested parties by the Commission, COM (2002) 704 final, Brussels.
  73. Commission of the European Communities, 2006, Green Paper: European Transparency Initiative, COM (2006) 194 final, Brussels.
  74. S. KALLAS, The Need for a European Transparency Initiative, SPEECH/05/130, Nottingham, 2005, http://ec.europa.eu, accessed on 03.07.2008.
  75. S. KALLAS, European Transparency Initiative, SPEECH/07/17, Madrid, 2007a, http://ec.europa.eu, accessed on 03.07.2008.
  76. S. KALLAS, The European Transparency Iniative, SPEECH/07/491, Brussels, 2007b, http://ec.europa.eu, accessed on 03.07.2008.
  77. The European Transparency Initiative, http://ec.europa.eu/commission_ barroso/kallas/transparency-en.htm, accessed on 30.06.2008.