KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Türkiye Mesleki ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 8

The impact of using the market orientation dimension of sustainable development on marketing strategies in industrial companies

Husam Yaseen Mohsin

Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-08-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗

Özet

It has triggered the fact that the strategic posture of a company as a sustainability and market orientation is acquiring increasing attention. Nonetheless, we have yet to learn the interaction between organizations' S-MO in the explanation of performance and innovation, particularly in mixed contexts of contemporary economies in settings of industrial sectors. Contributions in our work are in a number of areas. It explores (1), mediating role of IBO between performance and SO and (2) how MO mediates the relationship between IBO expatia performance and (3) various paths that are taken to innovative dilemmas between organizations an organization context. The case studies and the comparison breakdown of the international new ventures originating in Ghana are the final output contexts. Moreover, the study also relies upon structural equation modelling (SEM) analysis of 288 international new ventures that employ variable-oriented and case-oriented analytics strategies as well as fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) 151 Spanish agribusiness enterprises that is also multi method comparative analysis. The study is founded on the data of time-lag surveys. Partially mediates IBO between SO and post entry performance ( =.08, p h), Both the relationships SO -Post entry and MO -Post entry are significantly weaker with the other ( =.33, p =.01). Things can be equifinal to innovation ambidexterity in a variety of ways, and MO is a circumstance that cuts across the various configurations. Contextual forces can actually play a major role in the interaction between SO and MO that results into organizational effects. D1: Top managers are expected to introduce when sustainability is in broader strategy systems that reflect the market (as well as other competitive processes), shaped by firm-specific situation and contexts (p. 338). Both capacity building and market orientation should be encouraged through policymakers as a way of increasing sustainability.

Abstract

It has triggered the fact that the strategic posture of a company as a sustainability and market orientation is acquiring increasing attention. Nonetheless, we have yet to learn the interaction between organizations' S-MO in the explanation of performance and innovation, particularly in mixed contexts of contemporary economies in settings of industrial sectors. Contributions in our work are in a number of areas. It explores (1), mediating role of IBO between performance and SO and (2) how MO mediates the relationship between IBO expatia performance and (3) various paths that are taken to innovative dilemmas between organizations an organization context. The case studies and the comparison breakdown of the international new ventures originating in Ghana are the final output contexts. Moreover, the study also relies upon structural equation modelling (SEM) analysis of 288 international new ventures that employ variable-oriented and case-oriented analytics strategies as well as fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) 151 Spanish agribusiness enterprises that is also multi method comparative analysis. The study is founded on the data of time-lag surveys. Partially mediates IBO between SO and post entry performance ( =.08, p h), Both the relationships SO -Post entry and MO -Post entry are significantly weaker with the other ( =.33, p =.01). Things can be equifinal to innovation ambidexterity in a variety of ways, and MO is a circumstance that cuts across the various configurations. Contextual forces can actually play a major role in the interaction between SO and MO that results into organizational effects. D1: Top managers are expected to introduce when sustainability is in broader strategy systems that reflect the market (as well as other competitive processes), shaped by firm-specific situation and contexts (p. 338). Both capacity building and market orientation should be encouraged through policymakers as a way of increasing sustainability.

Anahtar kelimeler
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Mohsin, H. Y. (2026). The impact of using the market orientation dimension of sustainable development on marketing strategies in industrial companies. Türkiye Mesleki ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 8. https://ajindex.com/articles/1067194

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Al-Hyari, M. A. K., Al-Hyari, A. M. A. Z., & Al-Hyari, K. A. (2025). Integrating natural resource-based view and dynamic capabilities for sustainable agri-food supply chain resilience: An fsQCA study. Business Strategy and the Environment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3805
  2. Almeida, G. A. M. de, Sousa, P. R. G. de, & Silva, L. F. B. da. (2024). Resource-based view in the digital age: A systematic literature review and framework development. Review of Managerial Science, 18, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00737-1
  3. Alsetoohy, A. A., Alzoubi, F. M., & Alsetoohy, B. A. (2024). Market orientation, brand equity, and export performance of agribusiness SMEs: The contingent role of entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974438.2024.2311205
  4. Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Griffith, D. A. (2023). Overcoming the liability of emergingness: The role of brand orientation and marketing capabilities in the post-entry internationalization of emerging market firms. International Marketing Review, 40(5), 1097–1124. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-05-2022-0109
  5. Corchuelo Martínez-Azúa, B., Dias, Á., & Sama-Berrocal, C. (2025). The key role of market orientation in innovation ambidexterity in agribusiness firms. Review of Managerial Science, 19, 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00780-y
  6. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11 3.0.CO;2-E
  7. Frimpong, K., Adomako, S., Nguyen, N. P., & Al-Shuridah, O. (2025). Sustainability orientation and post-entry performance: The role of brand and market-oriented capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(1), 1189–1205. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3741
  8. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280033
  9. Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310390219
  10. Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
  11. Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400201
  12. Larranaga, F. D., de la Cruz, H. C. M., & Flores, M. A. G. (2024). Sustainability-oriented innovation and firm performance: A meta-analytic review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 200, 123201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123201
  13. Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400403
  14. Ozili, P. K. (2023). The circular economy, sustainability orientation and corporate social responsibility: A review and agenda for future research. Sustainable Development, 31(4), 2361–2373. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2540
  15. Shams, S. M. R., Khan, M. M., & Akter, M. S. (2024). Dynamic capabilities and sustainable competitive advantage in the agribusiness sector: The mediating role of digital transformation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 140123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140123
  16. Uzuegbunam, L. M., Uzuegbunam, N. S. G., & Obayi, K. E. (2023). Ambidextrous leadership, innovation ambidexterity, and SME performance in emerging markets: The moderating role of market turbulence. Journal of Business Research, 164, 114001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114001
  17. Zahoor, N., Lew, Y. K., Arslan, A., & Christoff, M. (2023). International corporate social responsibility and post-entry performance of developing market INVs. Journal of International Management, 29(4), 101036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2023.101036
  18. Zhou, K. Z., Li, J. J., Zhou, N., & Su, C. (2008). Market orientation, job satisfaction, product quality, and firm performance: Evidence from China. Strategic Management Journal, 29(9), 985–1000. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.690