KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Elektronik Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2

Eye Tracking, EEG ve GSR Yöntemlerinin İnsan-Bilgisayar Etkileşiminde Bibliyometrik Analizi

Bibliometric Analysis of Eye Tracking, EEG, and GSR Methods in Human-Computer Interaction

Koray Gündüz

Sayfa
573–584
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-07
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗

Özet

Bu araştırma, İnsan Bilgisayar Etkileşimi (İBE) alanında kullanılan biyofizyolojik veri toplama yöntemlerinden Eye Tracking (göz izleme), EEG (elektroensefalografi) ve GSR (galvanik deri tepkisi) tekniklerine yönelik literatürel eğilimleri incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Web of Science veri tabanından 1991-2025 yılları arasında elde edilen akademik yayınlar temel alınarak, VOSviewer yazılımı aracılığıyla bibliyometrik analiz gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada öncelikle yıllara göre yayın ve atıf sayılarındaki değişim incelenmiş, ardından anahtar kelime, yazar, ülke ve dergi dağılımları görselleştirilmiştir. Bulgular, Eye Tracking ve EEG yöntemlerinin İBE literatüründe daha yaygın biçimde kullanıldığını, buna karşın GSR yöntemine ilişkin çalışmaların daha sınırlı kaldığını ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca, insan bilgisayar etkileşiminin teknolojiyle iç içe geçen yapısının etkisiyle bu alandaki yayın sayısında belirgin bir artış eğilimi gözlemlenmiştir. Elde edilen veriler doğrultusunda, ilerleyen dönemlerde çoklu yöntemlerin birlikte kullanıldığı, disiplinlerarası yaklaşımları benimseyen ve hem nicel hem nitel verileri içeren çalışmaların İBE alanındaki bilgi birikimine önemli katkılar sağlayacağı öngörülmektedir.

Abstract

This research aims to examine the literary trends in the field of Human Computer Interaction (HCI) with respect to Eye Tracking, EEG (electroencephalography) and GSR (galvanic skin response) techniques, which are biophysiological data collection methods. Based on the academic publications obtained from the Web of Science database between 1991 and 2025, bibliometric analysis was carried out using VOSviewer software. The study first examined the changes in the number of publications and citations by year, and then visualized the distribution of keywords, authors, countries and journals. The findings revealed that Eye Tracking and EEG methods are more widely used in the ISI literature, whereas studies on the GSR method are more limited. In addition, a significant increase in the number of publications in this field has been observed due to the intertwined nature of human computer interaction with technology. In line with the data obtained, it is predicted that studies that use multiple methods together, adopt interdisciplinary approaches and include both quantitative and qualitative data will make significant contributions to the knowledge in the field of HCI in the future.

Anahtar kelimeler
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Gündüz, K. (2026). Eye Tracking, EEG ve GSR Yöntemlerinin İnsan-Bilgisayar Etkileşiminde Bibliyometrik Analizi. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Elektronik Dergisi, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2, 573–584. https://ajindex.com/articles/1066446

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

Kaynakça (26)

  1. Alemdağ, E. & Çağıltay, K. (2018). A systematic review of eye tracking research on multimedia learning. Computers & Education, 125, 413-428.
  2. Barutcu, E. I., ve Gulsecen, S. (2024). Öğretim tasarımı araştırmalarında göz takibi teknolojisinin kullanılmasının bibliyometrik analizi. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 13(4), 29-38.
  3. Carroll, J. M. (1997). Human–computer interaction: Psychology as a science of design. International journal of human-computer studies, 46(4), 501-522.
  4. Chandran, R. (2022). Human Computer Interaction in Robotics: A bibliometric evaluation using Web of Science. Metaverse Basic and Applied Research, (1), 13.
  5. Dar, M. N., Rahim, A., Akram, M. U., Khawaja, S. G., & Rahim, A. (2022). YAAD: young adult’s affective data using wearable ECG and GSR sensors. In 2022 2nd International Conference on Digital Futures and Transformative Technologies (ICoDT2), May. 1-7.
  6. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 133, 285-296.
  7. Felipe Solis-Pino, A., Ruiz, P. H., Agredo-Delgado, V., Mon, A., & Alberto Collazos, C. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis of the research landscape in human computer ınteraction in Ibero-America. Revista Tecno Lógicas, 27(59).
  8. Geng, Y., Shi, S., & Hao, X. (2025). Deep learning-based EEG emotion recognition: a comprehensive review. Neural Computing and Applications, 37(4), 1919-1950.
  9. Gündüz, K., Yücel, N. & Kişman, Z. A. (2024). Nato propaganda posterlerinin eye tracking ve gsr yöntemleri ile analiz edilmesi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 61, 229-247.
  10. He, J., Cao, T., & Duffy, V. G. (2023). Machine learning techniques and privacy concerns in human-computer interactions: a systematic review. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. July. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. 373-389.
  11. Jiang, Q., & Huang, Y. (2023). Affective computing research progress and ıts ımplications for education technology: a bibliometric analysis based on web of science via VOSviewer. In 2023 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (ICAIE 2023). September. Atlantis Press. 425-437.
  12. Karray, F., Alemzadeh, M., Abou Saleh, J. & Arab, M. N. (2008). Human-Computer İnteraction: overview on state of the art. International Journal on Smart Sensing and İntelligent Systems, 1(1), 137-159.
  13. Ke, F., Liu, R., Sokolikj, Z., Dahlstrom-Hakki, I., & Israel, M. (2024). Using eye-tracking in education: review of empirical research and technology. Educational technology research and development, 72(3), 1383-1418.
  14. Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., ... & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 62(10).
  15. Mehdipour, M., Chitsaz, E., & Etemadi, M. (2024). A Perspective on human ınteraction and artificial ıntelligence: bibliometric Analysis with Co-occurrence Technique.
  16. Novák, J. Š., Masner, J., Benda, P., Šimek, P., & Merunka, V. (2024). Eye tracking, usability, and user experience: A systematic review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(17), 4484-4500.
  17. Qiu, T., Qian, S., & Chen, X. (2024). Research Hotspots and trends of user-centered human-computer ınteraction: a bibliometric analysis. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. June. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. 161-177.
  18. Rashid, F. S. B. M., Kamsin, A. B., & Noor, N. F. B. M. (2024). Natural language processing studies in human computer ınteraction: a bibliometric analysis and future research framework. In 2024 IEEE 22nd Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD). December. IEEE. 617-622.
  19. Sadeghi Milani, A., Cecil-Xavier, A., Gupta, A., Cecil, J., & Kennison, S. (2024). A systematic review of human–computer interaction (HCI) research in medical and other engineering fields. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(3), 515-536.
  20. Sharma, R., & Meena, H. K. (2024). Emerging trends in EEG signal processing: A systematic review. SN Computer Science, 5(4), 415.
  21. Shi, Y. (2024). A Bibliometric analysis of eye tracking in user experience research. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. June. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. 178-193.
  22. Sinha, G., Shahi, R., & Shankar, M. (2010). Human computer interaction. In 2010 3rd International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology. November. 1-4.
  23. Tang, W., Chen, S., Shao, J., Du, X., Wu, J., Zhang, X., ... & Xue, C. (2025). Emerging themes and future directions in neurodesign and human-computer interaction: a systematic review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(2), 1652-1673.
  24. Wang, J., Cheng, R., Liu, M., & Liao, P. C. (2021). Research trends of human–computer interaction studies in construction Hazard recognition: A bibliometric review. Sensors, 21(18), 6172.
  25. Yavuz, M., Kayalı, B. & Tutal, Ö. (2021). “-Trend of distance education research in the covid-19 period: A bibliometric and content analysis”. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 4(2), 256-279.
  26. Zhang, Y., Cao, Y., Liu, Y., & Hu, X. (2023). Intelligent human computer interaction interface: a bibliometric analysis of 2010–2022. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. July. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. 590-604.