KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 18 Sayı: 4

Çevre Kalitesi Açısından Yakınsama Hipotezine Yeni Bir Bakış: Ekolojik Ayak İzi ve Kulüp Yakınsamaya Dayalı Ampirik Bir Analiz

Recep Ulucak

Sayfa
29–38
Yayın Tarihi
2018-12-20
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗

Özet

p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px 'Minion Pro'; min-height: 14.0px} p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; line-height: 10.1px; font: 10.0px 'Minion Pro'; color: #2d2829} span.s1 {font: 12.0px 'Minion Pro'; color: #000000} Çevre kalitesinin giderek bozulmasıyla birlikte iktisatta çevreci bir dönüşüm süreci başlamış, çevre ekonomisi, doğal kaynaklar ekonomisi ve ekolojik iktisat gibi alanlar ilgi çekmeye başlamıştır. Bu çerçevede çevresel unsurları temsil eden değişkenler kullanılarak ekonometrik analizler yoluyla politika önerileri oluşturulmaya çalışılmaktadır. Ancak literatürde bu alanla ilgili önemli kısıtlardan bir tanesi de çevreyi temsil edecek kapsamlı bir değişkene ihtiyaç duyulmasıdır. Bu ihtiyaca yönelik olarak ekolojik ayak izi’nin son yıllarda çevreyi kapsamlı bir şekilde temsil eden bir gösterge haline geldiği iddia edilmektedir. Dolayısıyla bu çalışma 1961-2009 dönemi için ekolojik ayak izi üzerinden çevresel yakınsama hipotezi’ni test etmektedir. Bunun için Phillips ve Sul (2007) tarafından özellikle panel gruplar için yakınsama hipotezini test etmek amacıyla geliştirilmiş olan ve ülkelerden kaynaklı heterojenliği dikkate alarak ortak özellikler taşıyan grupları kümeleyen kulüp yakınsama testi kullanılmaktadır. Elde edilen sonuçlar bir bütün olarak çevresel yakınsama hipotezinin geçerli olmadığını ancak yakınsayan kulüplerin olduğunu göstermektedir.  

Anahtar kelimeler
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ulucak, R. (2018). Çevre Kalitesi Açısından Yakınsama Hipotezine Yeni Bir Bakış: Ekolojik Ayak İzi ve Kulüp Yakınsamaya Dayalı Ampirik Bir Analiz. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 4, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.552674

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

↗Yeni Sekme

PDF belgesi yükleniyor...

Kaynakça (64)

  1. Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., & Hemous, D. (2012). The Environment and Directed Technical Change. The American Economic Review, 102(1), 131–166. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.131
  2. Acemoglu, D., Akcigit, U., Hanley, D., & Kerr, W. (2014). Transition to Clean Technology. Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.3386/w20743
  3. Ahmed, M., Khan, A. M., Bibi, S., & Zakaria, M. (2016). Convergence of per capita CO2 emissions across the globe: Insights via wavelet analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.053
  4. Al-Mulali, U., Weng-Wai, C., Sheau-Ting, L., & Mohammed, A. H. (2015). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecological Indicators, 48, 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.029
  5. Aldy, J. E. (2006). Per Capita Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Convergence or Divergence? Environmental & Resource Economics, 33, 533–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-6160-x
  6. Aldy, J. E. (2007). Divergence in state-level per capita carbon dioxide emissions. Land Economics, 83(3), 353–369. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27647777
  7. Aldy, J. E. (2007). Divergence in State-Level Per Capita Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Land Economics, 83(3), 353–369. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27647777
  8. Apergis, N. (2015). Convergence in Public Expenditure Across a Sample of Emerging Countries: Evidence from Club Convergence. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(3), 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2015.1025670
  9. Apergis, N., Christou, C., & Hassapis, C. (2013). Convergence in public expenditures across EU countries: evidence from club convergence. Economics & Finance Research, 1(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/21649480.2013.862735
  10. Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2017). Per capita carbon dioxide emissions across U.S. states by sector and fossil fuel source: Evidence from club convergence tests. Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.027
  11. Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C. S., … Pimentel, D. (1995). Economic Growth, Carrying Capacity, and the Environment. Science, 268(5210).
  12. Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223–251. https://doi.org/10.1086/261816
  13. Bartelmus, P. (2008). Quantitative eco-nomics: How sustainable are our economies? Quantitative Economics: How sustainable are our economies? Springer Netherlands.
  14. Bastianoni, S., Niccolucci, V., Pulselli, R. M., & Marchettini, N. (2012). Indicator and indicandum: “Sustainable way” vs “prevailing conditions” in the Ecological Footprint. Ecological Indicators, 16, 47–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.10.001
  15. Borucke, M., Moore, D., Cranston, G., Gracey, K., Iha, K., Larson, J., … Galli, A. (2013). Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere’s regenerative capacity: The National Footprint Accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecological Indicators, 24, 518–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolind.2012.08.005
  16. Brock, W. A., & Taylor, M. S. (2003). The Kindergarten Rule of Sustainable Growth (NBER No. Working Paper 9597). Massachusetts.
  17. Brock, W. A., & Taylor, M. S. (2010). The Green Solow model. Journal of Economic Growth, 15(2), 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-010-9051-0
  18. Burnett, J. W. (2016). Club convergence and clustering of U.S. energy-related CO2 emissions. Resource and Energy Economics, 46, 62–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2016.09.001
  19. Camarero, M., Picazo-Tadeo, A. J., & Tamarit, C. (2008). Is the environmental performance of industrialized countries converging? A “SURE” approach to testing for convergence. Ecological Economics, 66(4), 653–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.024
  20. Caviglia-Harris, J. L., Chambers, D., & Kahn, J. R. (2009). Taking the “U” out of Kuznets. A comprehensive analysis of the EKC and environmental degradation. Ecological Economics, 68(4), 1149–1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.006
  21. Chen, Y., Cuestas, J. C., & Regis, P. J. (2016). Convergence in Corporate Statutory Tax Rates in the Asian and Pacific Economies. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 21(3), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1546
  22. Claustre Bajona, , & Kehoe, T. J. (2010). Trade, growth, and convergence in a dynamic Heckscher–Ohlin model. Review of Economic Dynamics, 13, 487–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2010.05.002
  23. Cordero, E. C., Marie Todd, A., Abellera, D., Cordero, E. C., Todd, A. M., & Abellera, D. (2008). Climate Change Education and the Ecological Footprint. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 89(6), 865–872. https://doi.org/10.1175/2007BAMS2432.1
  24. Costanza, R. (2000). The dynamics of the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics, 32, 341–345. Retrieved from www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon
  25. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 3914(3914), 1–57. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914
  26. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic Growth and the Environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
  27. Haberl, H., Erb, K.-H., & Krausmann, F. (2001). How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: the case of Austria 1926–1995. Ecological Economics, 38(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00152-5
  28. Hao, Y., Wang, S., & Zhang, Z.-Y. (2015). Examine the Convergence in Per Capita Energy Consumption in China with Breakpoints. Energy Procedia, 75, 2617–2625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.341
  29. Herrerias, M. J. (2013). The environmental convergence hypothesis: Carbon dioxide emissions according to the source of energy. Energy Policy, 61, 1140–1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.120
  30. Hervieux, M. S., & Darné, O. (2015). Environmental Kuznets Curve and ecological footprint: A time series analysis. Economics Bulletin, 35(1), 814–826. http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2015/Volume35/EB-15-V35-I1-P84.pdf
  31. Howarth, R. B. (1998). An Overlapping Generations Model of Climate-Economy Interactions. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 100(3), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9442.00123
  32. Ioana-Laura, Ţ. (2015). Is there Evidence of Tax Convergence in the European Union? Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, 194–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01382-9
  33. Islam, N. (2003). What have We Learnt from the Convergence Debate? Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(3), 309–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00197
  34. Kitzes, J., & Wackernagel, M. (2009). Answers to common questions in Ecological Footprint accounting. Ecological Indicators, 9(4), 812–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.09.014
  35. Kurozumi, E., Yamazaki, D., & Hadri, K. (2013). COVARIATE UNIT ROOT TEST FOR CROSS-SECTIONALLY DEPENDENT PANEL DATA (QUEEN’S MANAGEMENT SCHOOL ECONOMICS WORKING PAPER SERIES No. 2013–1). Retrieved from ftp://ftp.qub.ac.uk/pub/users/repec/qub/wpaper/MS_WPS_ECO_13_01.pdf
  36. LaFree, G. (2005). Evidence For Elite Convergence in Cross-National Homicide Victimization Trends, 1956 to 2000. Sociological Quarterly, 46(1), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2005.00009.x
  37. Lanne, M., & Liski, M. (2004). Trends and Breaks in Per-Capita Carbon Dioxide Emissions, 1870-2028. The Energy Journal, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol25-No4-3
  38. Lau, C. K. M., Demir, E., & Bilgin, M. H. (2016). A Nonlinear Model of Military Expenditure Convergence: Evidence From Estar Nonlinear Unit Root Test. Defence and Peace Economics, 27(3), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2015.1016296
  39. Li, X., & Lin, B. (2013). Global convergence in per capita CO2 emissions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24, 357–363. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.048
  40. Mishra, V., & Smyth, R. (2014). Convergence in energy consumption per capita among ASEAN countries. Energy Policy (Vol. 73). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.006
  41. Narayan, P. K., & Narayan, S. (2010). Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy (Vol.38). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.005
  42. Neumayer, E. (2004). Indicators of Sustainability. In Thomas H. Tietenberg & H. Folmer (Eds.), The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2004/2005 (pp. 139–189). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  43. Nguyen Van, P. (2005). Distribution Dynamics of CO2 Emissions. Environmental & Resource Economics, 32(4), 495–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-7687-6
  44. Nordhaus, W. D. (1992). Lethal Model 2: The Limits to Growth Revisited. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 23(2), 1–60. https://www.brookings.edu/wpcontent/uploads/1992/06/1992b_bpea_nordhaus_stavins_weitzman.pdf
  45. Ozturk, I., Al-Mulali, U., & Saboori, B. (2016). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of tourism and ecological footprint. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(2), 1916–1928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5447-x
  46. Panopoulou, E., & Pantelidis, T. (2009). Club Convergence in Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 44(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9260-6
  47. Phillips, P. C. B., & Sul, D. (2007a). Transition Modeling and Econometric Convergence Tests. Econometrica, 75(6), 1771–1855. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00811.x
  48. Phillips, P. C. B., & Sul, D. (2007b). Transition Modeling and Econometric Convergence Tests. Econometrica, 75(6), 1771–1855. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00811.x
  49. Pjesky, R. J. (2013). Convergence In State And Local Spending On Education: Are Lotteries Ear Marked For Education The Key? Journal of Business & Economics Research, 11(3), 137–146. https://cluteinstitute.com/ojs/index.php/JBER/article/download/7665/7730/
  50. Presno, M. J., Landajo, M., & Fernández González, P. (2015). Stochastic convergence in per capita CO2 emissions. An approach from nonlinear stationarity analysis. Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.10.001
  51. Reyes, R. C. (2011). The Green Solow model with natural resources constraint: A theoretical note. DLSU Business and Economics Review, 21(1), 111–116. http://www.dlsu.edu.ph/offices/publishing-house/journals/ber/ber-publication.asp
  52. Solarin, S. A., & Lean, H. H. (2014). Nonlinearity convergence of tourism markets in Seychelles. Current Issues in Tourism, 17(6), 475–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2013.810612
  53. Solow, R. M. (1956). A CONTRIBUTION TO THE THEORY OF ECONOMIC GROWTH. Source: The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1884513
  54. Strazicich, M. C., & List, J. A. (2003). Are CO2 Emission Levels Converging Among Industrial Countries? Environmental and Resource Economics, 24(3), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022910701857
  55. Su, C.-W., Chang, H.-L., Chang, T., & Yin, K. (2014). Monetary convergence in East Asian countries relative to China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 33, 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2014.05.008
  56. Tiwari, A. K., Kyophilavong, P., & Albulescu, C. T. (2016). Testing the stationarity of CO2 emissions series in Sub-Saharan African countries by incorporating nonlinearity and smooth breaks. Research in International Business and Finance, 37, 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.01.005
  57. Ulucak, R., & Lin, D. (2017). Persistence of policy shocks to Ecological Footprint of the USA. Ecological Indicators, 80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.020
  58. Van Vuuren, D. P., & Smeets, E. M. W. (2000). Ecological footprints of Benin, Bhutan, Costa Rica and the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 34(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00155-5
  59. Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. The New Catalyst Bioregional Series. New Society Publishers.
  60. Wang, Y., Han, R., & Kubota, J. (2016). Is there an Environmental Kuznets Curve for SO2 emissions? A semi-parametric panel data analysis for China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 1182–1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.143
  61. Wang, Y., Kang, L., Wu, X., & Xiao, Y. (2013). Estimating the environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint at the global level: A spatial econometric approach. Ecological Indicators, 34, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.021
  62. Wang, Y., Zhang, P., Huang, D., & Cai, C. (2014). Convergence behavior of carbon dioxide emissions in China. Economic Modelling, 43, 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.07.040
  63. Westerlund, J., & Basher, S. A. (2008). Testing for Convergence in Carbon Dioxide Emissions Using a Century of Panel Data. Environmental and Resource Economics, 40(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9143-2
  64. Wiedmann, T., & Barrett, J. (2010). A Review of the Ecological Footprint Indicator—Perceptions and Methods. Sustainability, 2(6), 1645–1693. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2061645