KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 26 Sayı: 3

Kamu Yayıncılığında Kurumsal Bellek ve Anlamlandırma: TRT Örneği (1964–2023)

Organizational Memory and Sensemaking in Public Broadcasting: The Case of TRT (1964–2023)

Hasibe Aysan

Sayfa
1543–1564
Yayın Tarihi
2026-09-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗

Özet

Bu makale, Türkiye'nin ulusal kamu yayın kuruluşu olan Türkiye Radyo ve Televizyon Kurumu'nun (TRT) tarihsel evriminde örgütsel hafıza ve anlamlandırmanın nasıl etkileşim içinde olduklarını incelemektedir. 1964 ile 2023 yılları arasındaki arşiv kaynakları, program tarihleri ve kurumsal anlatılardan yararlanan çalışma, TRT'nin siyasi, teknolojik ve kültürel dönüşümlere uyum sağlarken geçmişini nasıl koruyup yeniden yorumladığını araştırmaktadır. Analiz, TRT'yi programları ve arşivleri örgütsel hafıza mekanizmaları olarak işlev gören, kurumsal sürekliliği ve uyumu sağlayan uzun ömürlü bir kamu kurumu olarak konumlandırmaktadır. Bu çalışma, TRT örneğini kullanarak örgütsel hafıza ve anlamlandırma arasındaki döngüsel ilişkiyi açıklamayı amaçlayan Uyarlanabilir Kurumsal Hafıza Modeli'ni (AIMM) önermektedir. AIMM, kurumların özellikle dijitalleşme ve siyasi dönüşüm dönemlerinde programlar, arşivler ve dijital içerik gibi hafıza mekanizmalarının seçici aktivasyonu yoluyla meşruiyetlerini ve uyum stratejilerini nasıl yönettiklerini göstermektedir. Örgütsel hafızayı yalnızca bir depolama alanı olarak gören işlevselci modellerin aksine, bu çalışma AIMM'yi, örgütsel hafızanın ulusal/devlet hafızasıyla kaynaştığı ve devlete güçlü biçimde eklemlenmiş kamu kurumlarında, devletle bağlantılı yayıncıların geleneksel ulusal anlatılar ile küresel dijital talepler arasında denge kurmaya çalıştığı bağlamlarda meşruiyet onarımı için stratejik bir mekanizma olarak konumlandırmaktadır.

Abstract

This article examines how organizational memory and sensemaking interact in the historical evolution of Turkey’s national public broadcaster, the Turkish Radio and Television Corporation (TRT). Drawing on archival sources, program histories, and institutional narratives between 1964 and 2023, the study explores how TRT has preserved and reinterpreted its past while adapting to political, technological, and cultural transformations. The analysis situates TRT as a long-lived public institution whose programs and archives have functioned as organizational memory mechanisms, enabling institutional continuity as well as adaptation. This study proposes the Adaptive Institutional Memory Model (AIMM), which is intended to explain the cyclical relationship between organizational memory and sensemaking, using the example of TRT. The AIMM demonstrates how institutions manage their legitimacy and adaptation strategies through the selective activation of memory mechanisms such as programs, archives, and digital content, especially during periods of digitalization and political transformations. Unlike functionalist models that view organizational memory as mere storage, this study positions the AIMM as a strategic mechanism for legitimacy repair in public organizations characterized by high state embeddedness and a fusion of organizational and national memory, where state-affiliated broadcasters negotiate between traditional national narratives and global digital demands.

Anahtar kelimeler
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Aysan, H. (2026). Kamu Yayıncılığında Kurumsal Bellek ve Anlamlandırma: TRT Örneği (1964–2023). Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 3, 1543–1564. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1932504

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

Kaynakça (27)

  1. Anderson, B. (2020). Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. In The new social theory reader (pp. 282-288). Routledge.
  2. Argote, L. (1999). Organizational learning: creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. New York, NY. Springer Nature.
  3. Argote, L., & Miron-Spektor E. (2011). Organizational learning: from experience to knowledge. Organization Science, 22, 1123–1137. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0621
  4. Bowen, Glenn A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9 (2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  5. Bradshaw, S., Elswah, M., & Perini, A. (2024). Look who’s watching: platform labels and user engagement on state-backed media outlets. American Behavioral Scientist, 68 (10), 1325–1344. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642231175639
  6. Coraiola, D, M., William M. Foster, Mena, S., Foroughi, H., & Rintamäki, J. (2023). Ecologies of memories: memory work within, between, and beyond organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 17 (1), 373–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2021.0088
  7. Decker, S., Hassard, J., & Rowlinson, M. (2021). Rethinking history and memory in organization studies: the case for historiographical reflexivity. Human Relations, 74 (8), 1123–1155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726720927443
  8. European Commission. (2023). Türkiye 2023 report commission staff working document. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from: https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/turkiye-report-2023_en
  9. Foster, William M., Coraiola, D., Quinn-Trank, C., & Bastien, F. (2020). Unpacking organizational re-membering. In Handbook of research on management and organizational history, edited by Kyle Bruse, 256–274. Cheltenham. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  10. Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational research methods, 16(1), 15-31.
  11. Greenwood, R., Raynard M., Kodeih, F., Evelyn R. M., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5 (1), 317–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2011.590299
  12. Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  13. Hampel, C. E., & Dalpiaz, E. (2023). Confronting the contested past: sensemaking and rhetorical history in the reconstruction of organizational identity. Academy of Management Journal 66 (6), 1711–1740. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2020.1132 Kane, G. C., & Alavi, M. (2007). Information technology and organizational learning: an investigation of exploration and exploitation processes. Organization Science, 18, 796–812. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0286
  14. Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Clegg, S. R. (2016). Conceptualizing historical organization studies. Academy of Management Review, 41 (4), 609–632. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0133
  15. Maclean, M., Harvey, C., Sillince, J.A.A., & Golant, B. D. (2014). Living up to the past? ideological sensemaking in organizational transition. Organization, 21 (4), 543–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508414527247
  16. Mills, H., Amy Thurlow, J., & Albert J. M. (2010). Making sense of sensemaking: the critical sensemaking approach. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 5 (2), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465641011068857
  17. Moorman, C., & Miner, A. S. (1997). The impact of organizational memory on new product performance and creativity. Journal of Marketing Research 34, 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379703400108
  18. Rowlinson, M., Booth, C., Clark, P., Delahaye, A., & Procter, S. (2010). Social remembering and organizational memory. Organization Studies, 31 (1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609347056
  19. RTUK. (2018–2024). Annual research reports. Ankara: RTUK. Retrieved from: https://www.rtuk.gov.tr/bilgi-merkezi_12
  20. Saldaña, J. (2010). Coding techniques for quantitative and mixed data. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 581–595). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203729434-14
  21. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: a sociological interpretation. New York: Harper & Row.
  22. Suddaby, R., Foster, W. M., & Mills., A. J. (2014). Historical institutionalism. In Organizations in time: history, theory, methods, edited by Bucheli, M., & Wadhwani, D.R. 100–123. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
  23. Suddaby, R., Israelsen, T., Bastien, F., Saylors, R., & Coraiola, D. (2023). Rhetorical history as institutional work. Journal of Management Studies, 60 (1), 242–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12860
  24. Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: from grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological theory, 30(3), 167-186.
  25. Türkiye Radyo Televizyon Kurumu (TRT). (2014-2025). Annual reports and activity reports. Ankara. Retrieved from: https://www.trt.net.tr
  26. Türkiye Radyo Televizyon Kurumu (TRT). (2025). Tarihçe. Ankara. Retrieved from: https://www.trt.net.tr Walsh, J. P., & Ungson, G.R. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review 16 (1): 57–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/258607
  27. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.