KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2

Mutluluk İktisadında Easterlin’e Karşı Veenhoven: İktisadi Büyüme Mutluluğu Artırır mı?

Veenhoven vs. Easterlin in Happiness Economics: Does Economic Growth Increase Happiness?

Hatime Kamilçelebi

Sayfa
691–720
Yayın Tarihi
2023-08-02
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗

Özet

Mutluluk iktisadı çalışmalarının öncülerinden biri olan Richard Easterlin çalışmalarında mutluluk ve kişi başına düşen milli gelir arasında anlamlıbir korelasyon olduğunu belirtmiştir. Diğer taraftan, ele aldığı ülkelerde kişi başına düşen milli gelir artışı olmasına rağmen belirtilen mutluluk seviyelerinde artış olmadığını ve zengin ülkelerde ortalama mutluluğun yoksul ülkelerden daha yüksek olmadığını ifade etmiştir. Easterlin’in bu sonucu literatürde “Easterlin Paradoksu” olarak adlandırılmaktadır. Mutluluk iktisadının öncülerinin bir diğeri olan Ruut Veenhoven ise Easterlin’in iktisadi büyüme ve mutlulukla ilgili çalışmasının çelişkili sonuçlarının ardından cevap niteliğinde çalışmalar yapmıştır. Veenhoven daha sonra Easterlin’in bu araştırmasında kullandığı aynı verilerle ve başka çalışma sonuçlarından da yararlanarak Easterlin’in araştırmasının ampirik sonuçlarını eleştirmiştir. Veenhoven, kişi başına düşen milli gelir artışının ülkelerin mutluluğunu artırdığını belirtmektedir. Easterlin, Veenhoven’a cevap niteliğinde yaptığı bilimsel çalışmalarında iktisadi büyüme ve mutluluk arasında uzun süreli bir ilişki olmadığı görüşünü devam ettirmektedir. Öte yandan Veenhoven konuyla ilgili şimdiye kadar yaptığı çalışmalarında çok sayıda ülkenin verileriyle test edilen sonuçların bunun aksini gösterdiğini belirtmektedir. Veenhoven’a göre “Easterlin Paradoksu” bir kuraldan ziyade bir illüzyondur. Her iki mutluluk iktisadı öncüsünün bu tartışmaları mutluluk iktisadı literatürünün temel taşlarıdır. Çalışmanın amacı Easterlin ve Veenhoven’ın birbirine cevap niteliğindeki bu araştırmalarını ve çalışmalarını detaylarıyla incelemek ve aynı zamanda iktisadi büyüme ve ülkelerdeki mutluluk artışı arasında ilişkiyi bu çalışmaların sonuçlarıyla açıklamaktır. Her iki bilim insanının kullandığı verilerden elde ettikleri bulgular karşılaştırıldığında, istisna ülkeler olmakla birlikte, kişi başına düşen milli gelir arttıkça yoksul vegelişmekte olan ülkelerde mutluluğun daha çok, gelişmiş ülkelerde ise daha az arttığı sonucuna varılmıştır.

Abstract

Richard Easterlin was one of the pioneers of happiness economics studies and stated in his studies that a significant correlation exists between happiness and per capita income. He also explained that, despite the occurrence of an increase in per capita income in the countries he’d studied in his work, no increase had occurred in the stated happiness levels, with the average happiness level in rich countries not being higher than in poor countries. This result is called the Easterlin Paradox in the literature. Ruut Veenhoven was another pioneer of happiness economics and replied to the contradictory results in Easterlin’s study on economic growth and happiness. Veenhoven later criticized the empirical results of Easterlin’s research by using the same data that Easterlin had used and comparing with the results from other studies. Veenhoven (1989) stated an increase in per capita income to increase that country’s happiness levels. As a response to Veenhoven, Easterlin maintained the view that no long-term correlation exists between economic growth and happiness in his scientific studies. However, Veenhoven stated that his studies on the subject so far and the results tested with data from many countries had revealed the opposite. According to Veenhoven, the Easterlin Paradox is an illusion rather than a rule. These discussions from both happiness economics pioneers form the cornerstones of the happiness economics literature. The aim of the study is to examine in detail the works and research of Easterlinand Veenhoven that occurred in response to one another while simultaneously explaining the relationship between economic growth and increase in happiness in countries using the results from their works. When comparing the findings obtained from the data used by both scientists, happiness has been concluded to increase more in poor and developing countries as per capita income increases than in developed countries, although some countries were seen to be exceptions.

Anahtar kelimeler
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kamilçelebi, H. (2023). Mutluluk İktisadında Easterlin’e Karşı Veenhoven: İktisadi Büyüme Mutluluğu Artırır mı?. İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 691–720. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1170876

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

↗Yeni Sekme

PDF belgesi yükleniyor...

Kaynakça (43)

  1. AIPO Poll. (1970). Reported in San Francisco Chronicle, January 14, 1971. google scholar
  2. Becchetti, L., Trovato, G., & Bedoya, D. (2011). Income, relational goods and happiness. Applied Economics, 43(3), 273-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840802570439 google scholar
  3. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7-8), 1359-1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00168-8 google scholar
  4. Bruni, L., & Stanca, L. (2008). Watching alone: relational goods, television and happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 65(3-4), 506 - 528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2005.12.005 google scholar
  5. Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95-144. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.46.1.95 google scholar
  6. Clark, A. E., Fleche, S., & Senik, C. (2012). The great happiness moderation. SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research, No. 468, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin. google scholar
  7. Deaton, A. (2008). Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup world poll. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.2.53 google scholar
  8. Diener, E., Tay, L., & Oishi, S., (2013). Rising income and the subjective wellbeing of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030487 google scholar
  9. Easterlin, R. A. (1973). Does money buy happiness?. The Public Interest, 30, 3-10. google scholar
  10. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In David, R. and Reder, R., (Eds.), Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz, New York: Academic Press, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7 google scholar
  11. Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27, 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(95)00003-B google scholar
  12. Easterlin, R. A. (1997). Growth triumphant: The twenty-first century in historical perspective. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. google scholar
  13. Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. The Economic Journal, 111(473), 465484, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00646 google scholar
  14. Easterlin, R. A. (2004). The economics of happiness. Daedalus, 133(2), 26-33. https://doi. org/10.1162/001152604323049361 google scholar
  15. Easterlin, R. A. (2005). Feeding the illusion of growth and happiness: A reply to Hagerty and Veenhoven. Social Indicators Research, 74(3), 429-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-6170-z google scholar
  16. Easterlin, R. A., & Angelescu, L. (2009). Happiness and growth the world over: Time series evidence on the happiness-income paradox. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4060, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1369806 google scholar
  17. Easterlin, R. A., McVey, L. A., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O., & Zweig, J. S. (2010). The happiness-income paradox revisited. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(52), 22463-22468. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015962107 google scholar
  18. Easterlin, R., & Sawangfa, O. (2010). Happiness and economic growth: Does the cross section predict time trends? Evidence from developing countries. In E. Diener, J. Helliwell; and D. Kahneman (Eds.), International differences in well-being, (pp. 166-216). Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  19. Easterlin, R. A. (2017). Paradox lost?, Review of Behavioral Economics, 4(4), 311-339. http://dx.doi. org/10.1561/105.00000068 google scholar
  20. Easterlin, R.A., O’Connor, K.J. (2022). The Easterlin paradox. In Zimmermann, K.F. (eds) Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_184-2 google scholar
  21. Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concern. Rutgers University Press. google scholar
  22. Hagerty, M. R. (2000). Social comparisons of income in one’s community: evidence from national surveys of income and happiness. Journal of personality and social psychology, 78(4), 764-771. https://doi. org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.4.764 google scholar
  23. Hagerty, M.R., & Veenhoven, R. (2003). Wealth and happiness revisited - growing national income does go with greater happiness. Social Indicators Research, 64(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024790530822 google scholar
  24. Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom, and rising happiness. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), 264-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00078.x google scholar
  25. Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 16489-16493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1011492107 google scholar
  26. Kamilçelebi, H. (2022). Beklenen fayda ve deneyimlenen fayda: Gelir artışı üzerine bir araştırma. 2. Baskı. Bursa: Ekin Yayınevi. google scholar
  27. Kamilçelebi, H. (2018). The difference between expected and experienced utility: A case study on a salary increase, Mauritius: Lambert Academic Publishing. google scholar
  28. Karabulut, G. (2017). Mutluluk ve iktisat. İstanbul: Der Yayınları. google scholar
  29. Killingsworth M. A. (2021). Experienced well-being rises with income, even above $75,000 per year. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(4), e2016976118. https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.2016976118 google scholar
  30. Killingsworth, M. A., Kahneman, D., & Mellers, B. (2023). Income and emotional well-being: A conflict resolved. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120(10), e2208661120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2208661120 google scholar
  31. Macunovich, D. J., & Easterlin, R. A. (2010). Easterlin hypothesis. In Durlauf, S.N., Blume, L.E. (Eds.) Economic Growth. London: The New Palgrave Economics Collection. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi. org/10.1057/9780230280823_6 google scholar
  32. Marx, K. (1933[1849]). Wage-labor and capital, in Selected Works, Vol. I, New York: International Publishers. google scholar
  33. Sacks, D. W., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2012). Subjective well-being, income, economic development and growth. In P. Booth (Ed.), The pursuit of happiness, (pp. 59 - 98), The Institute of Economic Affairs, London. google scholar
  34. Slag, M., Burger, M. J., & Veenhoven, R. (2019). Did the Easterlin paradox apply in South Korea between 1980 and 2015? A case study. International Review of Economics, 66, 325-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-019-00325-w google scholar
  35. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and happiness: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 39(1), 1-87. google scholar Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model, The Quarterly Journal ofEconomics, Oxford University Press, 106(4), 1039-1061. google scholar
  36. Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of happiness. Dordrecht: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6432-7 google scholar
  37. Veenhoven, R. (1989). National wealth and individual happiness. In K. G. Grunert & F. Ölander (Eds.), Understanding Economic Behaviour, (pp. 9-32). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-94-009-2470-3_2 google scholar
  38. Veenhoven, R. (1991). Is happiness relative?. Social Indicators Research, 24(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF00292648 google scholar
  39. Veenhoven, R. (2005). Apparent quality-of-life in nations: How long and happy people live. Social Indicators Research, 71(1), 61-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-8014-2 google scholar
  40. Veenhoven, R., & Hagerty, M. (2006). Rising happiness in nations 1946-2004: A reply to Easterlin. Social Indicators Research, 79(3), 421-436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-5074-x google scholar
  41. Veenhoven, R., & Vergunst, F. (2014). The Easterlin illusion: Economic growth does go with greater happiness. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1(4), 311-343. https://doi.org/10.1504/ IJHD.2014.066115 google scholar
  42. Veenhoven, R., & Kamilcelebi, H. (2023). Economic growth and happiness in nations between 1946-2019: The demise of the Easterlin paradox, EHERO Working Paper, Erasmus University Rotterdam. (Yayımlanacak) google scholar
  43. World Survey III. (1965). International data library and reference service, Survey Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley. google scholar