KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1

Assessing The FDI-Environment Nexus Using The Load Capacity Factor: A Seemingly Unrelated Regression Approach For G7 And Brics-T

Cem Kaan Arslan, Serap Barış

Sayfa
309–325
Yayın Tarihi
2026-02-19
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗

Abstract

The pursuit of economic growth has intensified countries’ efforts to attract foreign direct investment; however, growing concerns regarding the environmental consequences of such inflows underscore the need for broader and more comprehensive ecological indicators. This study contributes to the literature by examining the relationship between foreign direct investment and the load capacity factor, a holistic environmental quality measure that captures both ecological demand and ecological supply, thereby moving beyond traditional pollution-based metrics. Through this focus, the study also engages with the theoretical expectations of the Pollution Haven and Pollution Halo hypotheses. In addition, the study tests the load capacity curve hypothesis, which proposes that environmental quality initially deteriorates as income increases but improves once a certain level of economic development has been achieved. Using data from G7 and BRICS-T countries for the period 1992–2022, and estimating a Seemingly Unrelated Regression model, the findings reveal a negative and statistically significant relationship between foreign direct investment and the load capacity factor for BRICS-T economies, consistent with the Pollution Haven hypothesis. In contrast, for G7 countries, the relationship between foreign direct investment and the load capacity factor is not statistically significant, whereas per capita income displays the expected nonlinear pattern supporting the load capacity curve hypothesis. Overall, the results indicate that foreign direct investment places additional ecological pressure on emerging economies, whereas environmental quality in advanced economies improves after reaching higher income levels.

Anahtar kelimeler
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Arslan, C. K., Barış, S. (2026). Assessing The FDI-Environment Nexus Using The Load Capacity Factor: A Seemingly Unrelated Regression Approach For G7 And Brics-T. İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 309–325. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1826466

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

Kaynakça (66)

  1. Akbostanci, E., Tunc, G. I., & Turut-Aşik, S. (2007). Pollution haven hypothesis and the role of dirty industries in Turkey’s exports. Environment and Development Economics, 12(2), 297-322. google scholar
  2. Ali, E. B., Agbozo, E., & Aboagye, E. M. (2025). Revisiting the linkage between economic advancement, FDI, renewable energy, environmental goods, and the load capacity factor. Environment, Innovation and Management, 1, 2550016. google scholar
  3. Al-Mulali, U., Saboori, B., & Öztürk, İ. (2015). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Vietnam. Energy Policy, 76, 123–131. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.019 google scholar
  4. Altıntaş, H., & Kassouri, Y. (2020). Is the environmental Kuznets Curve in Europe related to the per-capita ecological footprint or CO2 emissions?. Ecological indicators, 113, 106187. google scholar
  5. Annor, L. D. J., Robaina, M., Vieira, E., & Mota, J. (2025). Pursuing the carbon neutrality agenda: The role of financial development, foreign direct investment, and effective governance. The European Journal of Development Research, 1-32. google scholar
  6. Awosusi, A. A., Kutlay, K., Altuntaş, M., Khodjiev, B., Agyekum, E. B., Shouran, M., … & Kamel, S. (2022). A roadmap toward achieving sustainable environment: evaluating the impact of technological innovation and globalization on load capacity factor. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(6), 3288. google scholar
  7. Ayad, H., Lefilef, A., Jahanger, A., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2024). Reinvestigate the effect of foreign direct investment on environmental quality in the MENA region: is there any difference using the load capacity factor?. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(3), 14810-14840. google scholar
  8. Bakirtas, I., & Cetin, M. A. (2017). Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve and pollution haven hypotheses: MIKTA sample. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 24, 18273–18283. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-9462-y google scholar
  9. Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Ibanez-Luzon, L., Usman, M., & Shahbaz, M. (2022). The environmental Kuznets curve, based on the economic complexity, and the pollution haven hypothesis in PIIGS countries. Renewable Energy, 185, 1441-1455. google scholar
  10. Başar, S., ve Temurlenk, M. S. (2007). “Çevreye Uyarlanmış Kuznets Eğrisi: Türkiye Üzerine Bir Uygulama”. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 21(1), 1-12. google scholar
  11. Bo, S. (2011). A Literature Survey on Environmental Kuznets Curve. Energy Procedia, 5: 1322-1325. google scholar
  12. Chancel, L. (2022). Global carbon inequality over 1990-2019. Nature Sustainability, 5(11): 931-938. google scholar
  13. Chung, S. (2014). Environmental Regulation and Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from South Korea. Journal of DevelopmentEcononics, 108, 222-236. google scholar
  14. Copeland, B. R. and Taylor, M. S. (1995). Trade and the Environment: A Partial Synthesis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77(3): 765-771. google scholar
  15. Çoban, A. (2004). Çok Uluslu Şirketler Ekolojik Zarar İlişkisinin Ekonomi-Politiği. In M.C. Marin ve U. Yıldırım (eds), Çevre Sorunlarına Çağdaş Yaklaşımlar: Ekolojik, Ekonomik, Politik ve Yönetsel Perspektifler (pp 1-27). Beta Yayınevi. google scholar
  16. De Beule, F., Schoubben, F., & Struyfs, K. (2022). The pollution haven effect and investment leakage: The case of the EU-ETS. Economics Letters, 215, 110536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110536 google scholar
  17. Demena, B. A. & Afesorgbor, S. K. (2020). The effect of FDI on Environmental Emissions: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis. Energy Policy, 138: 111-192. google scholar
  18. Doğan, A., & Pata, U. K. (2022). The role of ICT, R&D spending and renewable energy consumption on environmental quality: testing the lcc hypothesis For G7 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 380, 135038 google scholar
  19. Dunning, J. H. (1979). Explaining changing patterns of international production: In defence of eclectic theory. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41(4), 269–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1979. mp41004003.x google scholar
  20. Eskeland, G. S., Harrison, A. E. (2003). Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis. Journal of Development Economy, 70 (1): 1-23. google scholar
  21. Famanta, M., Randhawa, A. A., & Yajing, J. (2024). The impact of green FDI on environmental quality in less developed countries: A case study of load capacity factor based on PCSE and FGLS techniques. Heliyon, 10(7). google scholar
  22. Ganda, F. (2024). Analysing the impacts of FDI, material footprint and ICT on the load capacity factor in sub-saharan African countries. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1419307. google scholar
  23. Global Footprint Network (2025). Glossary, https://www.footprintnetwork.org/resources/glossary/(12/06/2025 google scholar
  24. Güler, İ., Naimoğlu, M., Şimşek, O., Adalı, Z., & Özbek, S. (2025). Analyzing the impact of economic growth and FDI on sustainable development goals in China: insights from ecological footprints and load capacity factors. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 13, 1513158.google scholar
  25. Grossman, G.M. & Krueger, A.B. (1991). Environmental Impacts of A North American Free Trade Agreement. National Bureau Economic Research, 39(14): 1-57.google scholar
  26. Kartal, M. T., Gokceli, E., Yildirim, H. H., & Calis, N. (2025). A new approach to analyze determinants of environmental quality: evidence from E7 countries by panel approaches. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 32(4), 428-445. google scholar
  27. Latif, N., & Faridi, M. Z. (2023). Examining the impact of financial development on load capacity factor (LCF): System GMM analysis for Asian economies. Frontiers in Energy Research 10: 1063212. google scholar
  28. Leonard, H. J. (1988). Pollution and the Struggle for the World Product: Multinational Corporations, Environment and International Comparative Advantage, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, https://books.google.com.tr/ google scholar
  29. Letchumanan, R., & Kodama, F. (2000). Reconciling the Conflict between the Pollution Haven Hypothesis and an Emerging Trajectory of International Technology Transfer. Research Policy, 29(1): 59-79.google scholar
  30. Liu Y, Hao, Y., & Gao, Y. (2017). The environmental consequences of domestic and foreign investment: evidence from China. Energ Policy, 108:271–280. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.055. google scholar
  31. Lu, H., & Huang, H. (2008). Dirty Industry Migration Globally and to China-an Empirical Study. International Review of Business Research Papers, 4(2), 176-202. google scholar
  32. Ma, N., Sun, W., Wang, Z., Li, H., Ma, X., & Sun, H. (2023). The effects of different forms of FDI on the carbon emissions of multinational enterprises: A complex network approach. Energy Policy, 181, 113731. google scholar
  33. Panayotou, T. (1993). Empirical Tests and Policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Development. ILO Technology and Employment Programme Working Paper, WP238 (1993) google scholar
  34. Pata, U. K. (2021). Do renewable energy and health expenditures improve load capacity factor in the USA and Japan? A new approach to environmental issues. The European Journal of Health Economics, 22(9), 1427–1439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01321-0google scholar
  35. Pata, U. K., & Kartal, M. T. (2023). Impact of nuclear and renewable energy sources on environment quality: Testing the EKC and LCC hypotheses for South Korea. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 55(2), 587–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2022.10.027 google scholar
  36. Padhan, L., & Bhat, S. (2024). Nexus between Foreign Direct Investment and Ecological Footprint in BRICS and Next-11: the Moderating role of Green Innovation. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 35(4): 799-817. google scholar
  37. Pavlović, A., Njegovan, M., Ivanišević, A., Radišić, M., Takači, A., Lošonc, A., et al. (2021). The impact of foreign direct investments and economic growth on environmental degradation: the case of the Balkans. Energies, 14 (3), 566. doi:10.3390/en14030566 google scholar
  38. Rahman, Z. U., Chongbo, W., & Ahmad, M. (2019). An (a)symmetric analysis of the pollution haven hypothesis in the context of Pakistan: a non-linear approach. Carbon Management. 10 (3), 227–239. doi:10.1080/17583004.2019.1577179 google scholar
  39. Ren, S., Yuan, B., Ma, X., & Chen, X. (2014). International trade, fdi and embodied CO2 emissions: a case study of China’s industrial sectors. China Economic Review, 28, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2014.01.003google scholar
  40. Roy, A. (2024). The impact of foreign direct investment, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, and natural resources on ecological footprint: an Indian perspective. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 18(1), 141-161. google scholar
  41. Saint Akadiri, S., Ozkan, O., & Alola, A. A. (2025). Investigating the determinants of load capacity factor in Nigeria: An asymmetric quantile approach on urbanization, economic growth, FDI, and resource dependency. Resources Policy, 104, 105586. google scholar
  42. Saleem, S. H., Ahmed, D. H., & Samour, A. (2024). Examining the impact of external debt, natural resources, foreign direct investment, and economic growth on ecological sustainability in Brazil. Sustainability, 16(3), 1037. google scholar
  43. Scrieciu, Ş. (2015). Measuring Environmental Action and Economic Performance in Developing Countries. GGKP Research Committee on Trade and Competitiveness. Working Pape 01/2015. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10073124/ google scholar
  44. Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Ahmed K, & Hammoudeh S. (2017). Trade openness-carbon emissions nexus: the importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Economics, 61:221–232. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.008. google scholar
  45. Siche, R., Pereira, L., Agostinho, F., and Ortega, E. (2010). Convergence of Ecological Footprint and Emergy Analysis as a Sustainability Indicator of Countries: Peru as Case Study. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 15 (10), 3182–3192. doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.10.027 google scholar
  46. Soto, G. H., & Edeh, J. (2025). Assessing the foreign direct investment-load capacity factor relationship in Spain: can FDI contribute to environmental quality?. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(7), 16181-16203. google scholar
  47. Teng, J. Z., Khan, M. K., Khan, M. I., Chishti, M. Z., & Khan, M. O. (2021). Effect of foreign direct investment on CO2 emission with the role of globalization, institutional quality with pooled mean group panel ARDL. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(5), 5271–5282. https:// doi.org/ 10. 1007/ s11356- 020- 10823-y google scholar
  48. The Economist (1992). Let Them Eat Pollution, February 8, Issue: 7745/82. google scholar
  49. Topal, S. (2024). LCC Hipotezi Çerçevesinde Türkiye’de Kirlilik Sığınağı Ve Kirlilik Hale Hipotezlerinin Sınanması. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 20(2), 418-436. google scholar
  50. Udemba, E. N. (2021). Nexus of Ecological Footprint and Foreign Direct Investment Pattern in Carbon Neutrality: New Insight for United Arab Emirates (UAE). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28: 34367-34385. google scholar
  51. Ulucak, R., & Apergis, N. (2018). Does convergence really matter for the environment? An application based on club convergence and on the ecological footprint concept for the EU countries. Environmental Science & Policy, 80, 21-27. google scholar
  52. Ullah, S., Luo, R., Adebayo, T. S., & Kartal, M. T. (2024). Paving the ways toward sustainable development: the asymmetric effect of economic complexity, renewable electricity, and foreign direct investment on the environmental sustainability in BRICS-T. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(4), 9115-9139. google scholar
  53. Van Tran, H., Tran, A.V., Bui Hoang, N. and Mai, T.N.H. (2024). Asymmetric Effects of Foreign Direct Investment and Globalization on Ecological Footprint in Indonesia. PLoS ONE, 19(1): 0297046. google scholar
  54. Wang, H., Dong, C., & Liu, Y. (2019). Beijing direct investment to its neighbors: A pollution haven or pollution halo effect? Journal of Cleaner Production, 239, 118062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118062google scholar
  55. WWF (2018). “Living planet report - 2018,” in WWF gland Switzerland. Editors M. Aiming Higher Grooten, and A. REA Available at: https://c402277sslcf1rackcdncom/publications/1187/files/original/LPR2018_Full_Report_Spreadspdf. google scholar
  56. Yandle, B., Vijayaraghavan, M., & Bhattarai, M. (2004). The environmental Kuznets curve. A Primer, PERC Research Study, 2(1), 1-38. google scholar
  57. Yerdelen Tatoğlu, F. (2012). İleri panel veri analizi. Beta Basım AŞ. google scholar
  58. Yerdelen Tatoğlu, F. (2020). Panel zaman serileri analizi. Beta Basım AŞ. google scholar
  59. Yıldırım M, Destek MA, & Manga M. 2024. Foreign investments and load capacity factor in BRICS: the moderating role of environmental policy stringency. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(7):11228–11242. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31814-9.google scholar
  60. Yi, J., Hou, Y., & Zhang, Z. Z. (2023). The impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) on China's manufacturing carbon emissions. Innovation and Green Development, 2(4), 100086. google scholar
  61. Zellner, A. (1962). An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57(298), 348–368. https://doi.org/10.2307/2281644 google scholar
  62. Zeng, K. and Eastin, J. (2012). Do Developing Countries Invest up? The Environmental Effects of Foreign Direct Investment from Less-developed Countries. World Development, 40(11): 2221-2233. google scholar
  63. Zeng, D. Z. & Zhao, L. (2009). Pollution Haven Sand Industrial Agglomeration. Journal of Environmental Economy Management, 58: 141-153. google scholar
  64. Zhang, C., Zhou, X., 2016. Does foreign direct investment lead to lower CO2 emissions? Evidence from a regional analysis in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 943–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.226. google scholar
  65. Zheng, J., Assad, U., Kamal, M. A., &Wang, H. (2024). Foreign direct investment and carbon emissions in China: “Pollution Haven” or “Pollution Halo”? Evidence from the NARDL model. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 67(3), 662–687. doi:10.1080/09640568.2022.2130194 google scholar
  66. Zhu, H., Duan, L., Guo, Y., & Yu, K. (2016). The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: evidence from panel quantile regression. Economic Modelling, 58, 237-248.google scholar