Dergiler / Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 20 Sayı: 46

TÜRKİYEDE HELİKOPTER EBEVEYNLİK EĞİLİMİ VE HELİKOPTER EBEVEYNLERİN DEMOGRAFİK ÖZELLİKLERİ

Sayfa
133–160
Yayın Tarihi
2020-05-26
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗

Özet

Çocuklarını yetiştirmede tutarsız bir otoriterlik ve aşırı korumacılık karışımıyla bilinen helikopter ebeveynlik tarzı; çocuğun yaşından bağımsız olarak onları kontrol etme ihtiyacı, onlara özerklik vermeme veya sınırlandırma, çocuklarını gerçekten sevmedikleri etkinlikleri yapmaya zorlama, farklı konularda ders aldırma veya başkalarıyla sosyalleşmesinden mahrum etme, akademik sonuçları her şeyden önemli ve öncelikli tutma, çocuklarının yaptıkları her şeyde haklı olduklarını düşünme eğilimi, okul öncesinden üniversiteye kadar her kademede öğretmen ve okul kurullarından sürekli olarak şikayette bulunma davranışlarıyla karakterize bir çocuk yetiştirme yaklaşımıdır. Yapılan araştırmanın amacı Türkiye’de helikopter ebeveynliğin yaygınlığını hem anne hem baba boyutunda ortaya koymaktır. Bu gelen amaç çerçevesinde anne babaların hangi konularda helikopter ebeveyn tutumlarının daha baskın olduğunun; yaş, cinsiyet, eğitim düzeyi, yerleşim yerinin özelliği gibi demografik değişkenlere göre tespit edilmesi hedeflenmiştir. Araştırmada betimsel tarama yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bu amaçla Yaşları 11 ile 22 arasında değişen ve ortaokul ile lisans üstü eğitim seviyelerinde öğrenim gören 1600 kişiye Algılanan Helikopter Ebeveyn ölçeği uygulanmıştır. Ebeveynlerinin tutumunu helikopter olarak algılayan 666 katılımcının verileri üzerinde de tanımlayıcı istatistik değerleri, varyans analizi, t testi ve Scheffe test yöntemleri ile analizler yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonunda, Türkiye’de annelerin üçte birinin, babaların ise yedide birinin helikopter ebeveyn tutuma sahip olduğu, annelerin babalara kıyasla daha fazla helikopter tutum sergiledikleri gözlenmiştir. Ortaokulda öğrenci olan katılımcıların algıladıkları helikopter ebeveyn tutumları, diğer eğitim kademelerindeki katılımcılardan yüksek bulunmuştur. Tek çocuklu, büyük şehirlerde yaşayan ebeveynlerde helikopter tutum daha fazla gözlenirken helikopter ebeveyn tutumunun çocukların cinsiyetinden etkilenmediğini de saptanmıştır.

Anahtar kelimeler
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yılmaz, H. (2020). TÜRKİYEDE HELİKOPTER EBEVEYNLİK EĞİLİMİ VE HELİKOPTER EBEVEYNLERİN DEMOGRAFİK ÖZELLİKLERİ. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 46, 133–160. https://doi.org/10.21560/spcd.v20i54504.540233

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

↗Yeni Sekme

PDF belgesi yükleniyor...

Kaynakça (55)

  1. Ahier, J. and Moore, R. (1999). Post-16 education, semi-dependent youth and the privatisation of inter-age transfers: Re-theorising youth transition. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(4), 515-530.
  2. Almendrala, A. (2015). Helicopter Parent' Doesn't Ortalama What You Think It Ortalamas: Just because you don't follow your kid to her job interview doesn't Ortalama you aren't helicopter parenting. Kaynak: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/what-is-a-helicopter-parent_n_56453977e4b08cda34883f85. (Erişim: 11.11.2018).
  3. Aslop, R. (2008). The trophy kids grow up: How the millennial generation is shaking up the workplace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  4. Bradley-Geist J., Olson-Buchanan J. (2014) Helicopter Parents: an Examination of The Correlates of Over-Parenting of College Students, Education Training, 56 (4), 314-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-10-2012-0096
  5. Bristow J. (2014) The Double Bind of Parenting Culture: Helicopter Parents and Cotton Wool Kids. In: Parenting Culture Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137304612_10
  6. Carney-Hall, K. (2008). Understanding current trends in family involvement. New Directions in Student Services, 122, 3-14.
  7. Childs, M. (2014). Mullendore: Cell phone is umbilical cord for helicopter parents. Kaynak: https://coe.uga.edu/news/2014/06/mullendore-cell-phone-isumbilical-cord-for-helicopter-parents. (Erişim: 24.8.2018)
  8. Cutright, M. (2008). From helicopter parent to valued partner: Shaping the parental relationship for student success. New Directions for Higher Education, 144, 39-48.
  9. Eberly-Lewis, M. B., Vera-Hughes, M. ve Coetzee, T. M. (2018). Parenting and Adolescent Grandiose Narcissism: Mediation through Independent Self-Construal and Need for Positive Approval. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 179(4), 207-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2018.1472549
  10. Fingerman, K. L., Cheng, Y., Wesselmann, E. D., Zarit, S., Furstenberg, F. and Birditt, K. S. (2012). Helicopter Parents and Landing Pad Kids: Intense Parental Support of Grown Children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 880-896. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00987.x
  11. Florida State University. (2016). Helicopter Parents: Hovering May Have Effect as Kids Transition to Adulthood. NeuroscienceNews. Kaynak: http://neurosciencenews.com/neurodevelopment-helicopter-parenting-4592/ (Erişim: 15.9.2018)
  12. Frey, T. K. ve Tatum, N. T. (2016). Hoverboards and “hovermoms”: helicopter parents and their influence on millennial students’ rapport with instructors. Communication Education, 65(3), 359-361. DOI: 10.1080/03634523.2016.1177846
  13. Garner, T. M. (2017). The relation of helicopter parenting to depressive symptomatology in emerging adults. Chair of Committee. Lisa A. Turner, Ph. D, University of South Alabama, East Eisenhower Parkway.
  14. Gibbs, N. (2009). The growing backlash against overparenting. Kaynak: Time. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1940697,00.html (Erişim: 11. 06. 2018)
  15. Ginnott, H. (1969). Between Parent and Teenager. London, England: Macmillan.
  16. Gude, K. 2014. “College Students and their Helicopter Parents: a Recipe for Stress.” Huffington Post. April 8. Kaynak: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/karl-gude/ parents-the-worst-kind-of_b_5097971.html. Last Accessed on June 16, 2015. (Erişim: 11.11.2018)
  17. Harper, C. E., Sax, L. J. and Wolf, De’Sha S. (2012). The Role of Parents in College Students’ Sociopolitical Awareness, Academic, and Social Development. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice 49(2), 137–56. https://doi.org/10.1515/jsarp-2012-6147
  18. Hesse, C., Mikkelson, A. C. ve Saracco, S. (2018). Parent–Child Affection and Helicopter Parenting: Exploring the Concept of Excessive Affection, Western Journal of Communication, 82(4), 457-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2017.1362705
  19. Hofer, B. K. and Moore, A. S. (2010). The iconnected parent: Staying close to your kids in college (and beyond) while letting them grow up. New York, NY: Free Press.
  20. Hong, J-C., Hwang, M.-Y., Kuo, Y-C. and Hsu, W-Y. (2015). Parental monitoring and helicopter parenting relevant to vocational student's procrastination and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 42, 139-146, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.003
  21. Hunt, J. (2008). Make room for daddy… and mommy: Helicopter parents are here! The Journal of Academic Administration in Higher Education, 4(1), 9-11.Johnson, H. and Schelhas-Miller, C. (2011). Don’t tell me what to do, just send me money: The essential parenting guide to the college years. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Griffin.
  22. Johnston, C., Belschner, L., Park, J. L., Stewart, K., Noyes, A. and Schaller, M. (2017). Mothers’ Implicit and Explicit Attitudes and Attributions in Relation to Self-Reported Parenting Behavior. Parenting, 17(1), 51-72. DOI: 10.1080/15295192.2016.1184954
  23. Juang, L. P., Qin, D. B., and Park, I. J. K. (2013). Deconstructing the myth of the “tiger mother”: An introduction to the special issue on tiger parenting, Asian-heritage families, and child/adolescent well-being. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 4(1), 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032136
  24. Kelly, L., Duran, R. L. and Miller-Ott, A. E. (2017) Helicopter parenting and cell-phone contact between parents and children in college. Southern Communication Journal, 82(2), 102-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2017.1310286
  25. Kouros, C.D., Pruitt, M.M., Ekas, N.V., Kiriaki, R. and Sunderland, M. (2017). Helicopter parenting, autonomy support, and college students’ mental health and well-being: The moderating role of sex and ethnicity. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(3), 939–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0614-3.
  26. Kuppens, S. ve Ceulemans, E. (2018). Parenting Styles: A Closer Look at a Well-Known Concept. Journal of Child and Family Studies, Erken görünüm, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1242-x
  27. Kwon, K. A., Yoo, G. and De Gagne, J. C. (2017). Does Culture Matter? A Qualitative Inquiry of helicopter Parenting in Korean American College Students. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(7), 1979–1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0694-8
  28. Lancaster, L. and Stillman, D. (2010). The m-factor: How the millennial generation is rocking the workplace. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
  29. Lindsay, C. A. (2011). All middle-class families are not created equal: Explaining the contexts that Black and White families face and the implications for adolescent achievement. Social Science Quarterly, 92(3), 761-781. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00791.x
  30. Locke, J., Campbell, M., and Kavanagh, D. (2012). Can a Parent Do Too Much for Their Child? An Examination By Parenting Professionals of the Concept of Overparenting. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 22(2), 249-265. doi:10.1017/jgc.2012.29
  31. Loftis, L. (2014). 9 Things We Don’t Discuss About Helicopter Parenting But Should. Kaynak: The Federalist. http://thefederalist.com/2014/04/17/9-things-we-dont-discuss-about-helicopter-parenting-but-should/ (Erişim: 10.11.2018).
  32. Luebbe, A. M., Mancini, K. J., Kiel, E. J., Spangler, B. R., Semlak, J. L. ve Fussner, L. M. (2016). Dimensionality of Helicopter Parenting and Relations to Emotional, Decision-Making, and Academic Functioning in Emerging. Adults. Assessment, 25(7), 841 – 857. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116665907
  33. Marcus, J. (2010). Forever Young: Students tied to the electronic apron strings. The Times Higher Education. Kaynak: https://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/forever-young-students-tied-tothe-electronic-apron-strings/412198.article. (Erişim: 21.4.2018)
  34. McGinley, M. (2018). Can Hovering Hinder Helping? Examining the Joint Effects of Helicopter Parenting and Attachment on Prosocial Behaviors and Empathy in Emerging Adults. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 179(2), 102-115. DOI: 10.1080/00221325.2018.1438985
  35. Merriman, L.S. (2007). Managing parental involvement. NASPA Leadership Exchange, 5(1), 14-18.
  36. Milita, K. and Bunch, J. (2017). Helicopter Parenting and the Policy Attitudes of College Students. Political Science and Politics, 50(2), 359-366. doi:10.1017/S1049096516002808
  37. Murray, J., Farrington, D., Sekol, I. ve Olsen, R. F. (2009). Effects of parental imprisonment on child antisocial behaviour and mental health: a systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 4, 56-59. DOI: 10.4073/csr.2009.4
  38. Odenweller, K. G., Booth-Butterfield, M. and Weber, K. (2014). Investigating Helicopter Parenting, Family Environments, and Relational Outcomes for Millennials, Journal Communication Studies (4), 407-425. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2013.811434
  39. Oishi, S. and Sullivan, H. W. (2005). The mediating role of parental expectations in culture and well‐being. Journal of Personality, 73(5), 1267-1294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00349.x.
  40. Padilla-Walker, L. M. and Nelson, L. J. (2012). Black hawk down?: Establishing helicopter parenting as a distinct construct from other forms of parental control during emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescence 35(5), 1177-1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.03.007
  41. Powell, D. N. and Karraker, K. (2017). Prospective Parents' Knowledge About Parenting and Their Anticipated Child‐Rearing Decisions. Fam Relat, 66, 453-467. doi:10.1111/fare.12259
  42. Reed, K., Duncan, J. M., Lucier-Greer, M., Fixelle, C., and Ferraro, A. J. (2016). Helicopter parenting and emerging adult self-efficacy: Implications for mental and physical health. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(10), 3136–3149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0466-x.
  43. Rousseau, S. ve Scharf, M. (2017). Why people helicopter parent? An actor–partner interdependence study of maternal and paternal prevention/promotion focus and interpersonal/self-regret. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(7), 919–935. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517700514
  44. Savage, M. (2003). You’re on your own (but I am here if you need me): Mentoring your child during the college years. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
  45. Schiffrin, H. H., Liss, M., Miles-McLean, H., Geary, K. A., Erchull, M. J. ve Tashner, T. (2014). Helping or Hovering? The Effects of Helicopter Parenting on College Students’ Well-Being. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(3), 548–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9716-3
  46. Sharma, A. ve Sarna, S. (2018). Is Parental Attachment Transforming Parents to Helicopter Parents? Global Journal for Research Analysis, 7(5), 13-15.Sirin, S., and Rogers-Sirin, L. (2004). Exploring school engagement of middle-class African American adolescents. Youth and Society, 35(3), 323-340. doi:10.1177/0044118X03255006
  47. Smetana, J. and Chuang, S. (2001). Middle-class African American parents’ conceptions of parenting in early adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 11(2), 177-198.
  48. Somers, P. ve Settle, J. (2010). The helicopter parent: Research toward a typology. College and University: The Journal of the American Association of Collegiate Registrars, 86(1), 18–27. Kaynak: https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-2148808521/the-helicopter-parent-research-toward-a-typology. (Erişim: 12.10.2018)
  49. Stone, J., Berrington, A. and Falkingham, J. (2011). The changing determinants of UK young adults’ living arrangements. Demographic Research, 25, 629–666.
  50. van Ingen, D. J., Freiheit, S. R., Steinfeldt, J. A., Moore, L. L., Wimer, D. J., Knutt, A. D., Scapinello, S. and Roberts, A. (2015). Helicopter Parenting: The Effect of an Overbearing Caregiving Style on Peer Attachment and Self‐Efficacy. Journal of College Counseling, 18(1). 7-20. doi:10.1002/j.2161-1882.2015.00065.x
  51. West, A. and Lewis, J. (2018). Helicopter Parenting and Boomerang Children: How Parents Support and Relate to Their Student and Co-Resident Graduate Children. by Routledge, 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, ISBN: 978-1-315-56316-9. Kaynak: http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/03/15/the-boomerang-generation/ (Erişim: 1.11.2018)
  52. Willoughby, B. J., Hersh, J. N., Padilla-Walker, L. M., and Nelson, L. J. (2015). “Back Off”! Helicopter Parenting and a Retreat From Marriage Among Emerging Adults. Journal of Family, 36(5), 669–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X13495854
  53. Yılmaz, H. (2019). İyi ebeveyn, çocuğu için her zaman her şeyi yapan ebeveyn değildir: Algılanan Helikopter Ebeveyn Tutum Ölçeği (AHETÖ) geliştirme çalışması. Journal of Early Childhood Studies, 3(1), 3-30. DOI: 10.24130/eccd-jecs.1967201931114
  54. Yoo, G., Liu, X. ve Cho, S. (2016). Effects of Perceived Helicopter Parenting on Subjective Well-Being among Chinese Undergraduate Students. Conference: CASS and ISA RC06 Conference Social Change and Family Developments on May 27th at Chinese Academy of Social Sciences in Beijing, China
  55. Zienty, L. and Nordling, J. (2018). Fathers are helping, mothers are hovering: Differential effects of helicopter parenting in college first-year students. Celebration of Learning. Kaynak: https://digitalcommons.augustana.edu/celebrationoflearning/2018/posters/19 (Erişim: 10.10.2018)