KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 51 Sayı: 1

Türkiye’de İlkokul İngilizce Kitapları: Filizlenen Okuryazarlık Çalışmalarının İncelenmesi

Turkey’s Primary English-as-a-foreign Language (EFL) Coursebooks: An Investigation of Emergent Literacy Tasks

Melike Ünal Gezer

Sayfa
220–236
Yayın Tarihi
2022-04-27
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗

Özet

Sözlü iletişim becerilerini ön planda tutan Türkiye’nin en yeni İngilizce öğretim müfredatı erken yaş İngilizcenin iletişime yönelik öğretilmesini öngörmektedir. İlkokul İngilizce programı haftada iki saatlik İngilizce saatlerinde 2. Sınıflar için dinleme ve konuşma ve 3. Sınıftan itibaren limitli miktarda okuma ve yazma çalışmalarından oluşmuştur. Sözlü iletişim becerileri vurgulanırken okuryazarlık becerileri ilkokulun alt düzeylerinde okuma ve yazmanın minimal düzeyde ve aşamalı olarak entegrasyonu ve üst kademelerde okuryazarlık pekiştirilmesi şeklinde arka plana alınmıştır. Başarılı bir İngilizce filizlenen okuryazarlık geliştirme erken yaş öğrenenlerin o dilde fonolojik (örn., aliterasyon, uyak), fonemik (örn., ses manipülasyonu), ve ortografik farkındalıklarına (örn., imla kuralları) bağlıdır. Mevcut çalışma Türkiye’nin yerel bağlamda oluşturmuş olduğu ve 2018-2021 akademik dönemlerinde okutulmuş İngilizce ders kitaplarının 2., 3., ve 4. Sınıflardaki erken yaş yabancı dil öğrenenlerin İngilizce okuryazarlık ihtiyaçlarına ne derece cevap verebildiğini incelemektedir. Çalışma ilkokul İngilizce ders kitaplarındaki erken yaş okuryazarlık farkındalığı içeriğini içerik analizine bağlı nitel ve betimleyici istatistiksel işlemleri içeren nicel analizlerle karma araştırma yöntemiyle incelemiştir. Analiz sonuçları incelenen ilkokul İngilizce kitaplarının dilbilimsel olarak ve pedagojik açıdan ikinci dil edinimi ve yabancı dil olarak İngilizce’de okuryazarlık geliştirilmesini sağlayamamaktadır. Türkiye’nin yanlış ayarlanmış erken yaş İngilizce okuryazarlık programı, hâlihazırdaki durumuyla, yabancı dil politikacılarına, materyal tasarımcılarına ve İngilizce öğretmenlerine ikaz mesajları iletmektedir.

Abstract

Turkey’s most recent primary English language curriculum, which highlights oral skills, mandates communicative English language teaching to young English language learners. Recent primary English curriculum comprises two hours per week of English-as-a-foreign language (EFL) instruction to include listening and speaking only for Grade 2 and very limited reading and writing for Grade 3 onward. While communicative skills are highly emphasized, literacy skills are kept on the back burner as reading and writing are incorporated gradually with minimal reading and writing at earlier grade levels and some literacy practices at upper grade levels. Successful emergent literacy development in English highly depends on young language learners’ phonological (e.g. alliteration, rhyme), phonemic (i.e. sound manipulation), and orthographic awareness (i.e. spelling conventions) in English. The present study investigates to what extent Turkey’s locally-designed primary EFL coursebooks—used in 2018-2021 academic period—cater to the early literacy needs of young learners at grades two, three, and four. The study explores early literacy content in coursebooks in a mixed-methods design: qualitatively with the descriptive content analysis and quantitatively with the frequency of early literacy constructs. The results of those analyses reveal primary English coursebooks do not promote a linguistically sound and pedagogically appropriate integration of literacy skills according to principles of second language (L2) literacy acquisition at primary levels. Turkey’s misaligned early English literacy curriculum, in its current state, sends alarming messages to foreign language policy-makers, material designers, and EFL educators.

Anahtar kelimeler
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Gezer, M. Ü. (2022). Türkiye’de İlkokul İngilizce Kitapları: Filizlenen Okuryazarlık Çalışmalarının İncelenmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 51 Sayı: 1, 220–236. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.982901

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

↗Yeni Sekme

PDF belgesi yükleniyor...

Kaynakça (105)

  1. Alptekin, C. (1993). Target-language culture in EFL materials. ELT Journal, 47(2), 136-143. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/47.2.136
  2. Araujo Portugal, J. C. (2020). Analysing speakout upper-intermediate second edition from an intercultural point of view. International Journal of Educational Spectrum, 2(2), 71-95.
  3. Arıkan, G. (2008). Textbook evaluation in foreign language teaching: Time for English, grade 4: teachers’ and students’ views[Unpublished master’s thesis]. Çukurova University.
  4. August, D., & Shanahan, T. (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the national literacy panel on language minority children and youth. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  5. Bialystok, E. (2002). Acquisition of literacy in bilingual children: A framework for research. Language Learning, 52, 159-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00412.x
  6. Brown, J. B. (1997). Textbook evaluation form. The Language Teacher, 2 (10), 15–21.
  7. Brown, D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Pearson Education.
  8. Büyükkantarcıoğlu, N. (2004). A sociolinguistic analysis of the present dimension of English as a foreign language in Turkey. International Journal of Sociology of Languages, 165, 33-58. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2004.006
  9. Byrd, P. (2001). Textbooks: Evaluation for selection and analysis for implementation. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 415–428). Heinle & Heinle.
  10. Byrd, P., & Schuemann, C. (2013). English as a second/foreign language textbooks: How to choose them how to use them. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. M. Brinton, & M. A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 380-393). Heinle Cengage Learning.
  11. Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge University Press.
  12. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
  13. Copland, F., & Garton, S. (2014). Key themes and future directions in teaching English to young learners:
  14. Introduction to the special issue. ELT Journal, 68(3), 223-230. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu030
  15. Crawford, J. (1990). How authentic is the language in our classrooms? Prospect, 6(1), 47-54.
  16. Crawford, J. (2002). The role of materials in the language classroom: Finding the balance. In J.
  17. R. Richards, & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching, (pp. 69-79).
  18. Cambridge University Press.
  19. Çakır, İ. (2010). The frequency of culture-specific elements in the ELT coursebooks at
  20. elementary schools in Turkey. Novitas-ROYAL, 4(2), 182-189.
  21. Çelik, S., & Erbay, Ş. (2013). Cultural perspectives of Turkish ELT coursebooks: Do standardized teaching
  22. texts incorporate intercultural features? Education and Science, 38(167), 336–351.
  23. Demir, Y., & Yavuz, M. (2017). Do ELT coursebooks still suffer from gender inequalities? A case study from Turkey. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 103-122.
  24. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2003). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Sage Publications.
  25. Enever, J. (Ed.) (2011). ELLiE: Early language learning in Europe. British Council.
  26. Ersöz, A. (1990). Coursebook analysis and design for ELT in Turkish state schools[Unpublished doctoral
  27. dissertation). Gazi University.
  28. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
  29. Genç, A. (2002). İlk ve ortaöğretim okullarında yabancı dil ders kitabı seçimi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim
  30. Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, 74-81.
  31. Geva, E., & Wang, M. (2001). The development of basic reading skills in children: A cross-language
  32. perspective. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 182-204. https://doi:10.1017/S0267190501000113
  33. Ghosn, I. K. (2002). Four good reasons to use literature in primary school ELT. ELT Journal, 56(2), 172-179. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.2.172
  34. Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  35. Güven, H., & Saracaloğlu, A. S. (2020). Dokuzuncu sınıf İngilizce ders kitabının öğretmen ve uzman görüşlerine göre değerlendirilmesi Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(2), 489-518. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-624.1.8c.2s.4m
  36. Halliwell, S. (1992). Teaching English in the primary classroom. Longman.
  37. Haznedar, B. (2004). Türkiye’de yabancı dil öğretimi: İlköğretim yabancı dil programı. Boğaziçi University
  38. Journal of Education, 21(2), 15-29.
  39. Haznedar, B. (2009, May). Remarks on foreign language education policies in Turkey: a critical evaluation
  40. of primary English textbooks. [Paper presentation]. First International Congress of Educational Research, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale.
  41. Haznedar, B. (2021). İkidillilik ve çok dillilik: Erken çocukluk döneminde birden fazla dil öğrenimi. Anı
  42. Yayıncılık.
  43. Haznedar, B., & Uysal, H. (2013). Embracing theory and practice in teaching languages to young learners.
  44. In B. Haznedar, & H. Uysal (Eds.), Handbook for teaching foreign languages to young learners in primary schools (pp. 1-22). Anı Yayıncılık.
  45. Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48(4), 315-328.
  46. Johnson, J. (1995). Who needs another coursebook? Folio Journal of the Materials Development Association, 2(1), 31-35.
  47. Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (2006). Handbook of orthography and literacy. Erlbaum Associates.
  48. Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Foster, & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67-84). Elsevier.
  49. Kırkgöz, Y. (2009a). Evaluating the English textbooks for young learners of English at Turkish primary
  50. education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 79-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.016
  51. Kırkgöz, Y. (2009b). Globalization and English language policy in Turkey. Educational Policy,23(5), 663-684.
  52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904808316319
  53. Kırkgöz, Y., Çelik, S., & Arıkan, A. (2016). Laying theoretical and practical foundations for a new elementary
  54. English curriculum in Turkey: A procedural analysis. Kastamonu Education Journal, 24(3), 1199-1212.
  55. Kocaoluk, F., & Kocaoluk, M. Ş. (2001). Primary Education Curriculum 1999-2000. Kocaoluk Publishers.
  56. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). TESOL methods: Changing tracks, challenging trends, TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 59-81. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264511
  57. Linse, C. T., & Nunan, D. (2005) Practical English language teaching: Young learners. McGraw-Hill.
  58. McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh University Press.
  59. McGrath, I. (2006). Teachers' and learners' images for coursebooks, ELT Journal, 60(2), 171–
  60. 180. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci104
  61. Ministry of National Education. (2018). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı 2023 Eğitim Vizyon Belgesi. https://www.gmka.gov.tr/dokumanlar/yayinlar/2023_E%C4%9Fitim%20Vizyonu.pdf
  62. Moats, L. C. (2005). How spelling supports reading and why it is more regular and predictable than you
  63. think. American Educator, 29(4), 12-43.
  64. Moats, L. C., & Tolman, C. A. (2019). LETRS: Language Essentials for teachers of reading and spelling. Sopris
  65. West.
  66. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific
  67. research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute for Child Health and Human Development.
  68. Nunan, D. (2015). Teaching English to speakers of other languages. Routledge.
  69. O’Neill, R. (1982). Why use textbooks? ELT Journal, 36(2), 104-111. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/36.2.104
  70. Özdemir, F. E. (2007). An evaluation of Time for English 4: The fourth grade coursebook for public
  71. schools[Unpublished master’s thesis]. Middle East Technical University.
  72. Pinter, A. (2006). Teaching young language learners. Oxford University Press.
  73. Richards, J. C. (2021, August 1). The role of textbooks in a language program. http://www.professorjackrichards.com/pdfs/role-of-textbooks.pdf
  74. Saraç, H. S., & Arıkan, A. (2010). Yabancı dil ders kitaplarında hedef kültür bilgisini incelemede
  75. kullanılabilecek kontrol listesi uygulaması. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3, 45-56. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/hititsosbil/issue/7709/100979
  76. Seymour, P. H., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143-174. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661859
  77. Sheldon, L. E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237-246.
  78. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/42.4.237
  79. Shin, J. K., & Crandall, J. A. (2014). Teaching young learners English: From theory to practice. National
  80. Geographic Learning/Cengage Learning.
  81. Solhi, M., Masrı, M. S., Şahin, Ş., & Yılmaz, S. (2020). Evaluation of the English language
  82. coursebooks used at the Turkish public elementary schools. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16 (3), 1282-1308. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.803714
  83. Şimşek, M. R., & Dündar, E. (2017). Investigating EFL coursebook research in Turkey: Trends in graduate
  84. theses of the 2001-2013 period. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(3), 969-1014. http://dx.doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.3.0090
  85. Republic of Turkey, Ministry of National Education. (2013). Elementary (primary and lower secondary) English language teaching program (Grades 2-8). Ankara, Turkey.
  86. Tomlinson, B. (2011). Introduction: Principles and procedures of materials development. In B. Tomlinson
  87. (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 1-31). Cambridge University Press.
  88. Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45,
  89. 143-179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000528
  90. Tomlinson, B., & Masuhara, H. (2010). Published research on materials development for language
  91. learning. In B. Tomlinson, & H. Masuhara (Eds.), Research for materials development in language learning: Evidence for best practice (pp. 1-18). Continuum.
  92. Treiman, R. (1998). Beginning to spell in English. In C. Hulme, & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling:
  93. development and disorders (pp. 371-393). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  94. Ünal Gezer, M., Dixon, Q. L. (2017). The role of phonology, morphology, and orthography in English word
  95. and pseudoword spelling performances of Turkish students across grades 6, 7, and 8. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 4(2), 137-160.
  96. Ünal Gezer, M. (2021). Storybooks, songs, and games: tools to boost early literacy development in primary
  97. English classrooms. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 8(4), 2683-2700.
  98. Vale, D., Özen. E. N., Alpaslan, I. B., Çağlı, A., Özdoğan, I., Sancak, M., Dizman, A. O., & Sökmen, A. (2013).
  99. Turkey national needs assessment of state school English language teaching. British Council.
  100. Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 192-212. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192
  101. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological
  102. processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.30.1.73
  103. Yaşar. Ö. (2015). İlkokul 2. sınıf Fun With Teddy İngilizce ders kitabının öğretmen görüşleri doğrultusunda
  104. değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 19(1), 329-348. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tsadergisi/issue/21494/230437
  105. Yopp, H. K., & Yopp, R. H. (2000). Supporting phonemic awareness development in the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 54(2), 130-143. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20204888
Türkiye’de İlkokul İngilizce Kitapları: Filizlenen Okuryazarlık Çalışmalarının İncelenmesi — AJIndex