KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 23 Sayı: 6

Şehirlerarası yol ağlarında bitümlü sıcak karışım kaplamalar için üstyapı performans tahmin modeli geliştirilmesi

Development of pavement performance prediction model for bituminous hot mix asphalt on interurban road networks

Ufuk Kırbaş
Mustafa Karaşahin
Emine Nazan Ünal
Muhammet Komut
Birol Demir
Kıvılcım Öcal
Sayfa
718–725
Yayın Tarihi
2017-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The accuracy of the IRI deterioration prediction model was controlled by the data sets not used in the modeling studies.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Normal 0 false false false TR X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Normal Tablo"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-ansi-language:TR;} The correct prediction of the deterioration of bituminous hot mix asphalt (HMA), which is a significant substructure investment for roads, is an indispensable element in the correct sorting of the budget allocated for maintenance and repair.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study has developed a pavement performance prediction model for state roads and intercity roads hot mix asphalt (HMA) coated under the responsibility of General Directorate of Highways (KGM) for capable of performance forecast for next year.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The accuracy of the IRI deterioration prediction model was controlled by the data sets not used in the modeling studies.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Esnek üstyapı · Bozulma modeli · Performans tahmini

Abstract

Normal 0 false false false TR X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Normal Tablo"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-ansi-language:TR;} The correct prediction of the deterioration of bituminous hot mix asphalt (HMA), which is a significant substructure investment for roads, is an indispensable element in the correct sorting of the budget allocated for maintenance and repair. This study has developed a pavement performance prediction model for state roads and intercity roads hot mix asphalt (HMA) coated under the responsibility of General Directorate of Highways (KGM) for capable of performance forecast for next year. International roughness index (IRI) were used as a performance indicator of pavements. Pavement condition index (PCI) of the road sections (year of construction of the road known by KGM), using existing pavement distresses data by PAVER system, were obtained. The prediction performance model was developed depending on the age and PCI of the road sections using deterministic regression model technique. Then, mathematical relationship was determined between PCI and IRI on the same road section. The obtained mathematical relationship is integrated into the prediction performance model. A prediction model determines the pavements IRI values for the coming years, based on independent variables of measured IRI value and year's estimated performance, were obtained. The accuracy of the IRI deterioration prediction model was controlled by the data sets not used in the modeling studies.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kırbaş, U., Karaşahin, M., Ünal, E. N., Komut, M., Demir, B., Öcal, K. (2017). Şehirlerarası yol ağlarında bitümlü sıcak karışım kaplamalar için üstyapı performans tahmin modeli geliştirilmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 6, 718–725. https://ajindex.com/articles/1058882

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

↗Yeni Sekme

Kaynakça (42)

  1. AASHTO. Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. Washington, USA, AASHTO, 1993.
  2. Haas R, Hudson WR, Zaniewski JP. Modern Pavement Management, Florida, USA, Krieger Pub. Co.,1994.
  3. Moazami D, Behbahani H, Muniandy R. “Pavement rehabilitation and maintenance prioritization of urban roads using fuzzy logic”. Expert Systems with Applications. 38(10), 12869-12879, 2011.
  4. Yang J, Lu J. “Gunaratne M, Xiang Q. Overall Pavement Condition Forecasting Using Neural Networks-an Application to Florida Highway Network”. 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, USA, 12-16 January 2003.
  5. Shahin MY. Pavement Management for Airports, Roads and Parking Lots, New York, USA, Springer, 2005.
  6. Ziari H, Sobhani J, Ayoubinejad J, Hartmann T. “Prediction of IRI in short and long terms for flexible pavements: ANN and GMDH methods”. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 17(9), 776-788, 2016.
  7. Salem O, El-Assaly A, Abou-Rizk S. “Performance prediction models of pavement highway network in alberta”. 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, USA, 12-16 January 2003.
  8. Khattak MJ, Landry C, Veazey J, Zhang Z. “Rigid and composite pavement index-based performance models for network pavement management system in the state of louisiana”. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 14(7), 612-628, 2013.
  9. Chou E, Pulugurta H, Datta D. “Pavement Forecasting Models”. Ohio Department of Transportation Columbus, OH, Scientific Report, 2008.
  10. Chen C, Zhang J. “Comparisons of IRI-Based pavement deterioration prediction models using new mexico pavement data”. Geo-Frontiers Congress, Dallas, Texas, USA, 13-16 March 2011.
  11. Luo Z. “Pavement performance modelling with an auto-regression approach”. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 14(1), 85-94, 2013.
  12. Ahmed K, Abu-Lebdeh G, Lyles RW. “Prediction of pavement distress ındex with limited data on causal factors: An auto-regression approach”. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 7(1), 23-35, 2006.
  13. Attoh-Okine NO, Cooger K, Mensah S. “Multivariate adaptive regression (MARS) and hinged hyperplanes (hhp) for doweled pavement performance modeling”. Construction and Building Materials, 23(9), 3020-3023, 2009.
  14. Parvini M. “Artificial neural network modeling of pavement performance using expert judgement”. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 3(4), 373-384, 2002.
  15. Khan MU, Williams DJ, Ferreira L, Mesbah M. “Developing a new road deterioration model ıncorporating flooding”. Proceedings of the ICE-Transport, 167(5), 322-333, 2014.
  16. Pulugurta H, Shao Q, Chou YJ. “Pavement condition prediction using markov process”. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 12(5), 853-871, 2009.
  17. Lethanh N, Adey BT. “Use of exponential hidden markov models for modelling pavement deterioration”. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 14(7), 645-654, 2013.
  18. Park ES, Smith RE, Freeman TJ, Spiegelman CH. “A bayesian approach for ımproved pavement performance prediction”. Journal of Applied Statistics, 35(11), 1219-1238, 2008.
  19. Hong HP, Wang SS. “Stochastic modeling of pavement performance”. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 4(4), 235-243, 2003.
  20. Hassan R, Lin O, Thananjeyan A. “A comparison between three approaches for modelling deterioration of five pavement surfaces”. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18(1), 26-35, 2015.
  21. Pan NF, Ko CH, Yang MD, Hsu KC. “Pavement performance prediction through fuzzy regression”. Expert Systems with Applications. 38(8), 10010-10017, 2011.
  22. Karaşahin M, Terzi S. “Performance model for asphalt concrete pavement based on the fuzzy logic approach”. Transport, 29(1), 18-27, 2014.
  23. Attoh-Okine NO. “Analysis of Learning Rate and Momentum Term in Backpropagation Neural Network Algorithm Trained to Predict Pavement Performance”. Advances in Engineering Software, 30(4), 291-302, 1999.
  24. Terzi S. “Modeling the pavement serviceability ratio of flexible highway pavements by artificial neural networks”. Construction and Building Materials, 21(3), 590–593, 2007.
  25. Terzi S. “Modeling for pavement roughness using the ANFIS approach”. Advances in Engineering Software, 57, 59-64, 2013.
  26. Attoh-Okine NO, Mensah S, Nawaiseh M. “A new technique for using multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) in pavement roughness prediction”. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport, 156(1), 51-55, 2003.
  27. Ahmed A, Labi S, Li Z, Shields T. “Aggregate and disaggregate statistical evaluation of the performance-based effectiveness of long-term pavement performance specific pavement study-5 (LTPP SPS-5) flexible pavement rehabilitation treatments”. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 9(2), 172-187, 2013.
  28. Mubaraki M. “Predicting Pavement Condition Deterioration for the Saudi Inter-Urban Road Network”. GeoHunan International Conference, Changsha, Hunan, China, 3-6 August 2009.
  29. Amador-Jiménez LE, Mrawira D. “Reliability-Based initial pavement performance deterioration modelling”. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 12(2), 177-186, 2011.
  30. Fekpe E, Attoh-Okine NO. “Deterioration modelling for lateritic-base flexible pavements”. Construction and Building Materials, 9(3), 159-163, 1995.
  31. Bennett C, Petersen W. A Guide to Calibration and Adaptation, Washington, DC, USA, PIARC, 1999.
  32. Braga A, Čygas D. “Adaptation of pavement deterioration models to lithuanian automobile roads”. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 8(3), 214-220, 2002.
  33. Odoki JB, Anyala M, Bunting E. “HDM-4 adaptation for strategic analysis of UK local roads”. Proceedings of the ICE-Transport, 166(2), 65-78, 2013.
  34. Martin TC. “Heavy vehicle road wear on sealed unbound granular roads”. Proceedings of the ICE-Transport, 164(1), 13-22, 2011.
  35. Jorge D, Ferreira A. “Road network pavement maintenance optimisation using the hdm-4 pavement performance prediction models”. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 13(1), 39-51, 2012.
  36. Chootinan P, Chen A, Horrocks MR, Bolling D. “A multi-year pavement maintenance program using a stochastic simulation-based genetic algorithm approach”. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(9),725-743, 2006.
  37. Chi S, Hwang J, Arellano M, Zhang Z, Murphy M. “Development of network-level project screening methods supporting the 4-year pavement management plan in Texas”. Journal of Management in Engineering, 29(4), 482-494, 2013.
  38. Chou JS, Le TS. “Reliability-Based performance simulation for optimized pavement maintenance”. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 96(10), 1402-1410, 2011.
  39. Meneses S, Ferreira A. “Flexible pavement maintenance programming considering the minimisation of maintenance and rehabilitation costs and the maximisation of the residual value of pavements”. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 16(7), 571-586, 2014.
  40. İncegül M, Ergün M. “An ıntegrated graphical user ınterface for pavement deterioration modeling”. Scientific Research and Essay, 6(17), 3649-3656, 2011.
  41. Güngör AG, Hacak B, Ünal EN. “Üstyapı yönetim sistemi KGM uygulamaları”. 2. Karayolu Ulusal Kongresi, Ankara, Türkiye, 11-13 Ekim 2011.
  42. Park K, Thomas NE, Wayne Lee K. “Applicability of the international roughness ındex as a predictor of asphalt pavement condition”. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 133(12), 706-709, 2007.