Dergiler / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2013 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

Implant destekli overdenture ve klasik tam protezlerin hasta memnuniyeti açısından karşılaştırılması

Comparison of patients satisfaction with implant-retained overdentures and conventional complete dentures

Sayfa
8–19
DOI
—

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalış manın amacı, klasik tam protez ve implant destekli tam protez kullanan hastaların memnuniyetlerini değ erlendirmek ve demografik özelliklerin memnuniyet üzerine etkisini incelemekti. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalış maya, 2011 yılında Yeditepe Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliğ i Fakültesinde, alt-üst klasik tam protez ve üst klasik-alt implant destekli tam protez uygulanan, 27si kadın ve 15i erkek, toplam 42 hasta dahil edildi. Hastalara, sosyodemografik özelliklerini (cinsiyet, yaş , ömedeni durum, öğ renim durumu, gelir düzeyi) içeren ve protezlerinin memnuniyetini değ erlendiren anket formları dağ ıtıldı. Cevapların, memnun değ ilim/memnunum/çok memnunum ş eklinde verilmesi istendi. Niteliksel verilerin karş ılaş tırılmasında Ki-Kare testi ve Fishers Exact Ki-Kare testi kullanıldı. Anlamlılık p

Abstract

Objectives: The aims of this study were to evaluate satisfaction of patients used implant- retained overdentures and conventional complete dentures, and to investigate the effect of sociodemographic properties on satisfaction. Materials and Methods: Forty two patients, 27 female and 15 male, used implant-retained overdentures and conventional complete dentures were included in this study, who attended to University of Yeditepe, Faculty of Dentistry in 2011. A questionnaire was prepared and distrubuted to evaluate the patient satisfaction levels about their dentures and sociodemographic properties such as age, gender, education, marital and income status. The answers were asked to give as not satisfied, satisfied, very satisfied. Chi-square test and Fisher s Exact Chi-square test were used to analyze the quantitative data. An alpha level of 0.05 was used for all statistical analyses. Results: The mean age of the 42 patients (64.3% female, 35.7% male) was 62.26. It was observed that patients with higher educational level prefered implant-retained overdentures, compared to conventional complete dentures. In the conventional complete denture group, higher numbers of patients were very satisfied with the cleanability compared to implant-retained overdenture group. (p=0.039). There was no statistically significant differences between implant-retained overdentures and conventional complete denture groups with regard to satisfaction level of esthetic, chewing, speech, retention and comfort. Conclusions: It can be concluded that sociodemographic factors did not affect the satisfaction of different denture types. The patients with conventional complete dentures were more satisfied with the cleanability, compared to implant- retained overdentures.