Dergiler / Legal Hukuk Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 173

BORÇLUNUN TASARRUFUN İPTALİ DAVASINA KONU OLABİLECEK “ALACAĞIN TEMLİKİ” TASARRUFLARI (“BORÇLUNUN YAPTIĞI TÜM ALACAĞIN TEMLİKİ İŞLEMLERİ” İÇİN Mİ YOKSA SADECE “BORÇLUNUN MUVAZAALI OLARAK YAPTIĞI (BEDELSİZ, KARŞILIKSIZ OLAN) ALACAĞIN TEMLİKİ İŞLEMLERİ” İÇİN Mİ TASARRUFUN İPTALİ DAVASI AÇILABİLECEĞİ?)

TRANSACTIONS OF “ASSIGNMENT OF A CLAIM“ WHICH MIGHT BE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE OBLIGOR’S CANCELLATION OF A TRANSACTION LAW SUIT; WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE TO INITIATE A LAW SUIT FOR OBLIGOR’S ALL “ASSIGNMENT OF A CLAIM” PROCEDURES, OR ONLY FOR PREARRANGED ASSIGNMENT OF CLAIM PROCEDURES (GRATIUTIOUS ONE

Talih UYAR

Sayfa
2411–2435
DOI
—

Özet

TRANSACTIONS OF "ASSIGNMENT OF A CLAIM" WHICH MIGHT BE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE OBLIGOR'S CANCELLATION OF A TRANSACTION LAW SUIT; WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE TO INITIATE A LAW SUIT FOR OBLIGOR'S ALL "ASSIGNMENT OF A CLAIM" PROCEDURES, OR ONLY FOR PREARRANGED ASSIGNMENT OF CLAIM PROCEDURES (GRATIUTIOUS ONES) THAT THE OBLIGOR UNDERTOOK?

Abstract

TRANSACTIONS OF “ASSIGNMENT OF A CLAIM“ WHICH MIGHT BE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE OBLIGOR’S CANCELLATION OF A TRANSACTION LAW SUIT; WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE TO INITIATE A LAW SUIT FOR OBLIGOR’S ALL “ASSIGNMENT OF A CLAIM” PROCEDURES, OR ONLY FOR PREARRANGED ASSIGNMENT OF CLAIM PROCEDURES (GRATIUTIOUS ONES) THAT THE OBLIGOR UNDERTOOK?