Dergiler / Tarih ve Gelecek Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2
Atatürk Dönemi Fikir Hareketleri
- Sayfa
- 344–359
- DOI
- —
Özet
Atatürk dönemi fikir hareketlerini üç başlıkta ve üç devrede incelemek gerekmektedir. Birinci devre, 1920-1925 arasındaki klasik dönemdir. Bu dönemde Osmanlı’dan kalan fikir hareketleri, olduğu gibi varlığını sürdürmüştür. İkinci devre, 1925-1930 arasındaki istihale dönemidir. Bu dönemde başta Türkçülük olmak üzere fikir hareketleri bir istihale devresine girmiş, yeni dönemin kodlarına uygun bir hale gelecek şekilde değişmeye/değiştirilmeye başlamıştır. Üçüncü devre ise 1930 sonrası Kemalizm dönemidir. Bu dönemde artık tek bir fikir hareketi kalmıştır, o da devrimin ideolojisi olan Kemalizm’dir.
Abstract
Idea movements had been shaped around journals in both last two centuries of OttomanEmpire and the founding years of Republic of Turkey. Although these journals were examined independently in terms of their contents and claims, the idea movements in the Ataturk period werenot considered as holistic and classified. It is aimed in this article that to make a classification ofthe intellectual movements of Ataturk period based on the periodicals of the period. Through thisclassification, it is also aimed to clarify how these century-old idea movements have changed in theprocess extending from the Ottoman Empire to Republic of Turkey.In this article, the idea movements of Atatürk period are examined under three titles and three cycles. The first period is the classical period between 1920 and 1925. During this period, theOttoman intellectual movements remained as they were. The second period is the period of the invasion between 1925-1930. In this period, the intellectual movements, especially Turkism, enteredinto a period of tendering and began to change and transform in a way that made it compatible withthe codes of the new era. The third and the last period is the period of Kemalism after 1930. Therewas only one idea movement in this period which was the ideology of the revolution, Kemalism. Itis tried to be clarified that, however, even in the Ataturk era, there was not a single understandingof Kemalism that had certain limits and contents.