SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 21 Sayı: 4

Postmodern Culture and Public Relations: An Analysis through Campaigns

Beris Artan Özoran

Pages
1051–1070
Publication Date
2021-12-21
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗

Özet

Despite the diversity of paradigms in the field of public relations, it is evident that the dominant paradigm in the field is the functional paradigm, which defines public relations as a "management function". It leads to the ignorance of "cultural function" of public relations and becomes an obstacle to the development of the field. By establishing a relationship between public relations and culture, this article addresses public relations as a "cultural intermediary" profession that is influenced by the postmodern culture and (re)produces postmodern culture.In the article, three public relations campaigns determined by purposive sampling were analyzed using critical discourse analysis within the framework of multiple case analysis. How postmodern cultural features do public relations campaigns (re)produce; how they (re)produced the postmodern understanding of consumption, whether they reproduce the concepts of polyphony, equality and freedom by deconstructing modernity was analyzed. As a result, it is found that campaigns re(produce) the individualization, modular identity, spectacle, and simulation features of the postmodern culture of the campaigns and, the postmodern understanding of consumption by attributing "new meanings" to organizations and products. At the same time, it is found that they do not ensure polyphony, equality, and freedom by deconstructing modernity and resisting metanarratives, but rather "pretends" to reproduce them.

Keywords
🔖

Cite This Article

Özoran, B. A. (2021). Postmodern Culture and Public Relations: An Analysis through Campaigns. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 4, 1051–1070. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1039499

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

References (66)

  1. Aktaş, M. (2013). Halkla ilişkiler araştırmalarında vaka incelemesinin kullanımı üzerine. In M. Aktaş and P. Özdemir (Ed.), Halkla ilişkilerin kazancı (p.187-197). Ankara: De Ki Yayınları.
  2. Allagui, I. (2017). Towards organizational activism in the UAE: A case study approach. PR Rewiev, 43, 258-266. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.12.007
  3. Arman, A. (2017, 29 April). Can Bonomo: Erkekler kendileriyle barışırlarsa kadınlarla da barışacaklar. Hürriyet. Retrieved from: http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/yazarlar/ayse-arman/can-bonomoerkekler-kendileriyle-barisirlarsa-kadinlarla-da-barisacaklar-40442060
  4. Axe Can Bonomo ile “Erkekler de Ağlar” dedi, 36 saatte 4.6 milyon tık aldı. Marketing Türkiye. (2017 April). Retrieved from: https://www.marketingturkiye.com.tr/haberler/axe-can-bonomo-ile-erkekler-de-aglar-dedi-36-saatte4-6-milyon-tik-aldi/
  5. Axe Türkiye. (2017, 29 March). Erkekler de ağlar (Video). Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwLpSiBvnKs
  6. Balaban, U. (2014, March). Bir sonraki temaşayı beklerken: Hadise toplumunda deneyim ve temsil. Bianet. Retrieved from: https://m.bianet.org/bianet/bianet/154442-bir-sonraki-temasayi-beklerkenhadise-toplumunda-deneyim-ve-temsil
  7. Batı, U. (2015). Tüketim davranışları. İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.
  8. Baudrillard, J. (2008). Tüketim toplumu. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  9. Baudrillard, J. (2012). Kusursuz cinayet. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  10. Baudrillard, J. (2014). Simülakrlar ve simülasyon. Ankara: Doğu Batı Yayınları.
  11. Bauman, Z. (2000a). Ölümlülük, ölümsüzlük ve diğer hayat stratejileri. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  12. Bauman, Z. (2000b). Siyaset arayışı. İstanbul: Metis Yayıncılık.
  13. Bauman, Z. (2001). Bireyselleşmiş toplum. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  14. Beck, U. (2011). Risk toplumu: Başka bir modernliğe doğru. İstanbul: İthaki Yayınları.
  15. Berk, Y. and Yıldırım, K. (2015). Yapısacılık ile post-yapılsalcılık bağlamında dil ve metinden anlam kurma. Okuma Yazma Eğitimi Araştırmaları, 3, 39-45. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/oyea/issue/24685/261032
  16. Berthon, P and Katsikeas, A. (1998). Essai: Weaving postmodernism. Internet Research, 8, 149-155. doi: 10.1108/10662249810211610
  17. Best, S. and Kellner, D. (2016). Debord and postmodern turn: New stages of the spectacle. Retrieved from: https://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/Illumina%20Folder/kell17. htm.
  18. Bora, E. S. (2016). Yapı ve yıkım eylemi olarak mimari manifestolar. (Master thesis, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul). Retrieved from: https://polen.itu.edu.tr/handle/11527/14273
  19. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  20. Caldiero, C. (2016). Neo-PR: Public relations in a postmodern world. NY: Peter Lang.
  21. Curtin, P. And Gaither, K. (2005). Privileging identity, difference and power: the circuit of culture as a basis for public relations theory. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17, 91-115. doi: 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1702_3
  22. Çelik, G. (2016). Erkekler (de) ağlar!: Toplumsal cinsiyet rolleri bağlamında erkeklik inşası ve şiddet döngüsü. FE Dergisi, 8, 1-12. doi: 10.1501/Fe0001_0000000161
  23. DDB Worldwide. (2014, 2 June). Lufthansa: Are your Klaus Heidi? (Video). Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QAIHqrWtLs
  24. Debord, G. (2006). Gösteri toplumu. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  25. Edwards, L. and Hodges, M. C. (2011). Public relations, society and culture. New York: Routledge.
  26. Edwards, L. (2011). Defining the object of pr research: a new starting point. Public Relations Inquiry, 1, 7-30. doi: 10.1177/2046147X11422149
  27. Edwards, L. (2012). Exploring the role of public relations as a cultural intermediary occupation. Cultural Sociology, 6(4), 438-454. doi: 10.1177/1749975512445428
  28. Eliot, T.S. (1987). Kültür üzerine düşünceler. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Yayınları.
  29. Fırat. (1991). The consumer in postmodernity. In R.H. Holmance and M.R. Solomon (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (p.70-76). USA: Association for Consumer Research.
  30. Freidman, U. (2013, December). How one airline convinced 42 swedes to change their names. The Atlantic. Retrieved from: https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/12/how-one-airlineconvinced-42-swedes-to-change-their-names/282346/
  31. Funk, R. (2013). Ben ve biz: Postmodern insanın psikanalizi. İstanbul: YKY.
  32. Gower, K. (2009). Halkla İlişkiler Araştırmaları Yol Ayrımında. In F. Keskin and P. Özdemir (Ed.), Halkla ilişkiler üzerine (p. 31-53). Ankara: Dipnot Yayınları.
  33. Güzel, M. (2015). Gerçeklik ilkesinin yitimi: Baudrillard’ın simülasyon teorisinin temel kavramları. Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19, 65-84. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/flsf/issue/48624/978823
  34. Harris, M. (1999). Theories of culture in postmodern times. London: Altamira Press.
  35. Holtzhausen, D. (2000). Postmodern values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 2, 93-114. doi: 10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1201_6
  36. Holtzhausen, D. (2002). Towards a Postmodern Agenda for Public Relations. Public Relations Review, 28, 251-264. doi:10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00131-5
  37. Holtzhausen, D. and Voto, R. (2009). Resistance from the margins: The postmodern public relations practitioner as organizational activist. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14, 57-84. doi:10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1401_3
  38. Is it ok for guys? Axe says yes. (2017, 10 October). Retrieved from: https://www.unilever.com/news/news-andfeatures/Feature-article/2017/is-it-ok-for-guys-axe-says-yes.html Accessed:10.10.2017.
  39. Karaduman, S. (2010). Modernizmden postmodernizme kimliğin yapısal dönüşümü. Journal of Yaşar University, 17, 2886-2899. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jyasar/issue/19129/202992
  40. Kosovic, M. (2011). Revisiting the society of the spectacle in the post-9/11 world. Contemporary Issues, 4, 18-29. Retrieved from: http://contemporary-issues.vern.hr/files/1537b89cccb3209491f9a242bb079563.pdf
  41. Krouber, A.L. and Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Cambridge: Peabody Museum of American Archeology and Ethnology.
  42. L’Etang, J. (2013). Public relations: A discipline in transformation sociology. Compass, 7, 799-817. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12072
  43. Lewis, A. (2017). News: Gold for the impossible signing session at Cannes Lions 2017. Retrieved from: https://www.teamlewis.com/us/insights/articles/news-gold-for-the-impossiblesigning-session-at-cannes-lions-2017
  44. Negus, K. (2002). The work of cultural intermediaries and the enduring distance between production and consumption. Cultural Studies, 16, 501-515. doi: 10.1080/09502380210139089
  45. O’Connor, J. (2015). Intermediaries and imaginaries in the cultural and creative industries. Regional Studies, 49, 374-387. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.748982
  46. Odabaşı, Y. (2012). Postmodern pazarlama. İstanbul: Media Cat Kitapları.
  47. Odabaşı, Y. (2013). Tüketim kültürü: Yetinen toplumdan tüketen topluma. İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık.
  48. Oğuz, E. S. (2011). Toplum bilimlerinde kültür kavramı. Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(2), 123-139. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/huefd/issue/41213/505402
  49. Oktan, A. (2008). Türk sinemasında hegomonik erkeklikten erkeklik krizine: yazıtura ve erkeklik bunalımının sınırları. Selçuk İletişim Dergisi, 5, 152- 166. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/josc/issue/19016/200711
  50. O’Sullivan, T., Hartley, J., Saunders, D., Montgomery and Fiske, J. (1994). Key concepts in communication and cultural studies. London: Routledge.
  51. Özcan, K. (2012). Postmodern örgüt kuramı. Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi.
  52. Palinkas, L., Horwitz, S.M., Green, C.A., Wisdom, J.P., Duan, N. And Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed methodimplementation research. Adm Policy Ment. Health, 42, 533-544. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
  53. Parsa, A. F. (2004). İmgenin gücü ve görsel kültürün yükselişi. Anadili Dergisi, 33, 59-71. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308785296_Imgenin_Gucu_ve_Gorsel_Kulturun_Yukselisi
  54. Radford, G. (2011). Public relations in a postmodern world. Public Relations Inquiry, 1, 49-67. doi: 10.1177/2046147X11422143
  55. Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies. London: Sage Publication.
  56. Sartori, G. (2006). Görmenin iktidarı. İstanbul: Karakutu Yayınları.
  57. Soydan, M. (2008). Postyapısalcı bir okumayla eurimages destekli türk filmlerinin çözümlenmesi. (PhD Thesis, Ege Üniversitesi, İstanbul). Retrieved from: https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=-NI6y5t2xs28Ue_pPvhSeQ&no=Kt0dKhufIa3xk4qayBr8KQ
  58. Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. (Ed.) The Sage handbook of qualitative research (p.443-466). CA: Sage.
  59. Swedish Klaus Heidi made world famous by Lufthansa campaign. (2018, 12 Feburary). Retrieved from: https://www.ddb.com/blog/press-releases/swedish-klaus-heidi-made-world-famous-by-lufthansaspr-campaign//?closed=true
  60. The impossible signing session. (2018, 7 January). Retrieved from: https://www.coloribus.com/adsarchive/onlinedirectmarketingcasestudy/unknownadvertiser-the-impossible-signing-session-image-16616365-22519965
  61. Toth, E. (2002). Postmodernism for modernist public relations: the cash value and application of critical research in public relations. Public Relations Review, 28, 243-250. doi: 10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00130-3
  62. Uçan, G. (2012). Post-Modern erkek(lik). CBÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10, 262-271. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cbayarsos/issue/4066/53645
  63. Watson, N. (2006). Postmodernizm ve yaşam tarzları. In S.Sim (Ed.) Postmodern düşüncenin eleştirel sözlüğü (p. 45-59). İstanbul: Ebabil Yayınları.
  64. Yıldız, N. (2013). Aşk yüzyılı bitti: Aşk’ta, İş’te, Siyaset’te yeni zamanlar. İstanbul: Doğan Kitap.
  65. Yin, R. (2009). Case study research design and methods. USA: Sage Publications.
  66. Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 9, 1-6. Retrieved from: https://jurnalkemanusiaan.utm.my/index.php/kemanusiaan/article/view/165