SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 55 Sayı: 1

An Examination of the Predictors of Teachers’ Professional Learning: The Role of Demographic Variables, Academic Optimism and Distributed Leadership

Öğretmenlerin Mesleki Öğrenmelerinin Yordayıcılarının İncelenmesi: Demografik Değişkenler, Akademik İyimserlik ve Dağıtılmış Liderliğin Rolü

Berrenur Dinç
Demet Hacımustafaoğlu
Elanur Ersan Albayrak
Murat Özdemir
Pages
42–74
Publication Date
2026-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results might contribute to the body of research on teachers’ professional learning and provide implications for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines how teachers’ professional learning in schools is related to various variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of the study consists of 586 teachers working in public middle schools in the central districts of Ankara during the 2023-2024 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results might contribute to the body of research on teachers’ professional learning and provide implications for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2023-2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Öğretmen Mesleki Öğrenmesi · Okul Akademik İyimserliği · Dağıtılmış Liderlik

Abstract

This study examines how teachers’ professional learning in schools is related to various variables. Specifically, it questions the extent to which teachers’ demographic variables, school academic optimism, and distributed leadership sequentially explain their professional learning. The sample of the study consists of 586 teachers working in public middle schools in the central districts of Ankara during the 2023-2024 academic year. The data were collected using the Distributed Leadership Inventory, the School Academic Optimism Scale, and the Teacher Professional Learning Scale. The data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Pearson correlation, and hierarchical regression methods. Significant correlations were found among the variables. Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that teachers' educational status and gender did not have a significant effect on predicting their professional learning; however, years of experience were found to have a significant effect. Results revealed that teachers' demographic characteristics did not have a significant effect on teacher professional learning. Nevertheless, when school academic optimism and distributed leadership variables were added to the demographic variables, they were found to predict teachers' professional learning in a sequential manner. These results might contribute to the body of research on teachers’ professional learning and provide implications for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers.

Özet

Bu çalışma, okullarda öğretmenlerin mesleki öğrenmelerinin çeşitli değişkenlerle olan ilişkisini incelemektedir. Özellikle, öğretmenlerin demografik değişkenlerinin, okul akademik iyimserliğinin ve dağıtılmış liderliğin, mesleki öğrenmelerini ardışık olarak hangi düzeyde açıkladığını sorgulamaktadır. Araştırmanın örneklemi, 2023-2024 eğitim öğretim yılında Ankara ili merkez ilçelerindeki resmi ortaokullarda görevli 586 öğretmenden oluşmaktadır. Veriler, Dağıtılmış Liderlik Envanteri, Okul Akademik İyimserliği Ölçeği ve Öğretmen Mesleki Öğrenmesi Ölçeği kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Toplanan veriler betimsel istatistikler, doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA), Pearson korelasyon ve hiyerarşik regresyon yöntemleri ile analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda değişkenler arasında anlamlı korelatif ilişkiler tespit edilmiştir. Hiyerarşik regresyon analizi, öğretmenlerin eğitim durumları ve cinsiyetlerinin mesleki öğrenmelerini yordamada anlamlı bir etkiye sahip olmadığını; ancak deneyim yıllarının anlamlı bir etkiye sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Araştırma neticesinde, öğretmenlerin demografik özelliklerinin öğretmen mesleki öğrenmesi üzerinde etkili olmadığı görülmüştür. Bununla birlikte, okul akademik iyimserliği ve dağıtılmış liderlik değişkenleri demografik değişkenlere eklendiğinde, öğretmenlerin mesleki öğrenmelerini ardışık bir biçimde yordadıkları bulunmuştur. Bu sonuçlar, öğretmenlerin mesleki öğrenmeleri konusundaki araştırma literatürüne katkı sağlayabilir ve politika yapıcılar, uygulayıcılar ile araştırmacılar için çıkarımlar sunabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Dinç, B., Hacımustafaoğlu, D., Albayrak, E. E., Özdemir, M. (2026). An Examination of the Predictors of Teachers’ Professional Learning: The Role of Demographic Variables, Academic Optimism and Distributed Leadership. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 55 Sayı: 1, 42–74. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.1619386

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

↗New Tab

References (94)

  1. Admiraal, W., Kruiter, J., Lockhorst, D., Schenke, W., Sligte, H., Smit, B.,. & de Wit, W. (2016). Affordances of teacher professional learning in secondary schools. Studies in Continuing Education, 38(3), 281-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2015.1114469
  2. Akiba, M., & Liang, G. (2016). Effects of teacher professional learning activities on student achievement growth. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(1), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.924470
  3. Alenezi, A. F. (2019). The relationship between distributed leadership practices and academic optimism among faculty members in Northern Border University. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 9(1), 61-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2019.003
  4. Argon, T., & Ertürk, R. (2018). Okullarda takas kuramının uygulanma durumunun yönetici-öğretmen etkileşimine etkisi. C.T. Uğurlu vd. (Ed.), Eğitim Yönetimi Araştırmaları içinde (s. 464-475). Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Yayıncılık.
  5. Beard, K. S., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2010). Academic optimism of individual teachers: Confirming a new construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(5), 1136-1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.02.003
  6. Bektaş, F., Kılınç, A. Ç., & Gümüş, S. (2020). The effects of distributed leadership on teacher professional learning: mediating roles of teacher trust in principal and teacher motivation. Educational Studies, 48(5), 602-624. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1793301
  7. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 251-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/14682370201100306
  9. Bruce, C. D., Esmonde, I., Ross, J., Dookie, L., & Beatty, R. (2010). The effects of sustained classroom-embedded teacher professional learning on teacher efficacy and related student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1598-1608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.011
  10. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi.
  11. Cassity, A. H. (2012). Relationships among perceptions of professional learning communities, school academic optimism, and student achievement in Alabama middle and high schools (Publication no. 3539972) [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Alabama]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
  12. Cemaloğlu, N., & Dolapcı, E. (2022). Öğretmen mesleki öğrenmesine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Eğitim ve Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(1), 35-54. https://doi.org/10.51725/etad.974730
  13. Chang, I-H. (2011). A study of the relationships between distributed leadership, teacher academic optimism and student achievement in Taiwanese elementary schools. School Leadership & Management, 31(5), 491-515, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2011.614945
  14. Choi, T. H. (2013). Autobiographical reflections for teacher professional learning. Professional Development in Education, 39(5), 822-840. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.737355
  15. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3.ed.). Erlbaum.
  16. Creswell, J. W. (2017). Araştırma deseni: Nitel, nicel ve karma yöntem araştırmaları (Çev. Ed., S. B. Demir). Eğiten Kitap.
  17. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
  18. Çoban, D., & Demirtaş, H. (2011). Okulların akademik iyimserlik düzeyi ile öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılığı arasındaki ilişki. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 17(3), 317-348. https://izlik.org/JA65YF89DT
  19. Enthoven, S., März, V., & Dupriez, V. (2023). Context matters: A meta-ethnographic study on teachers’ workplace learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104224
  20. Erol, Y. C., & Turhan, M. (2018). The relationship between distributed leadership and family involvement from parents' perspective. Educational Sciences-Theory & Practice, 18(3), 525-540. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.3.0388
  21. Gallegos Araya, V. M., & López Alfaro, P. A. (2019). Influencia del liderazgo distribuido y de la eficacia colectiva sobre el compromiso organizacional docente: un estudio en Chile. Profesorado, Revista De Currículum Y Formación Del Profesorado, 23(2), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v23i2.9270
  22. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623
  23. Gökyer, N. (2019). Ortaokul öğretmenlerinin yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimleri. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(1), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.26468/trakyasobed.463102
  24. Gökyer, N. (2020). Lise öğretmenlerinin yöneticilerinin dağıtılmış liderlik davranışlarına ilişkin algıları. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(1), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.700337
  25. Gray, J. A., & Mitchell, R. (2021). Academic optimism and enabling school structure: Predictors of Professional learning communities. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 16(1), 1-23.
  26. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00120-0
  27. Gümüş, S., Apaydın, Ç., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2018). Öğretmen mesleki öğrenme ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama, 9(17), 107-124. https://izlik.org/JA55KN45PG
  28. Hairon, S., Goh, J. W. P., & Lin, T. B. (2013). Distributed leadership to support PLCs in Asian pragmatic Singapore schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 17(3), 370–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2013.829586
  29. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2009). Distributed leadership in schools: Does system policy make a difference. In: A. Harris (Ed). Distributed leadership: Different perspectives, 7, 101-117. Dordrecht: Springer.
  30. Hammad, W., Abu Shindi, Y., Morad, H., Al-Mahdy, Y. F. H., & Al-Harthi, K. (2021). Promoting teacher professional learning in Egyptian schools: The contribution of learning-centered leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 27(6), 1209-1227. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1969038
  31. Hansen, R. J., Brady, E. M., & Thaxton, S. P. (2016). Demographic and behavioral characteristics of Osher lifelong learning institute members. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 64(1), 42-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2016.1131541
  32. Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: according to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 172-188. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810863253
  33. Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., & Hopkins, D. (2007). Distributed leadership and organizational change: Reviewing the evidence. Journal of Educational Change, 8(4), 337-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-007-9048-4
  34. Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659-689. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209340042
  35. Hong, FY. (2017). Antecedent and consequence of school academic optimism and teachers’ academic optimism model. Educational Studies, 43(2), 165-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1248902
  36. Hoy, A. W., Hoy, W. K., & Kurz, N. M. (2008). Teacher's academic optimism: The development and test of a new construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(4), 821-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.08.004
  37. Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2006). Academic optimism of schools: A force for student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 425-446. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043003425
  38. Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Rosseel, Y. (2009). Development and validation of scores on the distributed leadership inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(6), 1013-1034. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409344490
  39. Johnson, C. W., & Voelkel, R. H. (2019). Developing increased leader capacity to support effective professional learning community teams. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 24(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1600039
  40. Kalkan, F. (2015). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin mesleki öğrenme topluluğu algılarının bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Electronic Turkish Studies, 10(11), 847-868. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.8448
  41. Khadka, J., Dhakal, R. K., & Joshi, D. R. (2024). Effects of distributed leadership practices on educational environment and achievement in Nepali schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2024.2313016
  42. Kılınç, A. Ç., Polatcan, M., Atmaca, T., & Koşar, M. (2021). Öğretmen mesleki öğrenmesinin yordayıcıları olarak öğretmen öz yeterliği ve bireysel akademik iyimserlik: Bir yapısal eşitlik modellemesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 46(205), 373-394. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8966
  43. Kılınç, A. Ç., Polatcan, M., Turan, S., & Özdemir, N. (2022). Principal job satisfaction, distributed leadership, teacher-student relationships, and student achievement in Turkey: A multilevel mediated-effect model. Irish Educational Studies, 43(2), 281-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2022.2061567
  44. Kock, N. (2021). Harman’s single factor test in PLS-SEM: Checking for common method bias. Data Analysis Perspectives Journal, 2(2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
  45. Korkmaz, E., & Gündüz, H. B. (2011). İlköğretim okulu yöneticilerinin dağıtımcı liderlik davranışlarını gösterme düzeyleri. Kalem Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1), 123-153. https://doi.org/10.23863/kalem.2017.4
  46. Kulophas, D., & Hallinger, P. (2020). Leadership that matters: creating cultures of academic optimism that support teacher learning in Thailand. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(6), 605-627. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-12-2019-0222
  47. Kulu, M. (2020). Okul yöneticilerinin dağıtımcı liderlik davranışları ile öğretmenlerin mesleki topluluk düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki [Yüksek lisans tezi]. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi.
  48. Kuru, N. K., & Tabancalı, E. (2023). The relationship between teachers' professional learning, school culture, and teachers’ demographic characteristics. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 8(3), 682-696. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.1282840
  49. Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Baert, H. (2013). The learning intentions of low-qualified employees: A multilevel approach. Adult Education Quarterly, 63(2), 165-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136124543
  50. Li, L., Hallinger, P., & Walker, A. (2016). Exploring the mediating effects of trust on principal leadership and teacher professional learning in Hong Kong primary schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 20-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214558577
  51. Lin, Q. (2022). The relationship between distributed leadership and teacher innovativeness: Mediating roles of teacher autonomy and professional collaboration. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948152
  52. Liu, S., & Hallinger, P. (2018). Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in China: Testing a mediated-effects model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(4), 501-528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18769048
  53. Liu, S., Hallinger, P., & Feng, D. (2016). Learning-centered leadership and teacher learning in China: Does trust matter? Journal of Educational Administration, 54(6), 661-682. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2016-0015
  54. Liu, S., Keeley, J. W., Sui, Y., & Sang, L. (2021). Impact of distributed leadership on teacher job satisfaction in China: The mediating roles of teacher autonomy and teacher collaboration. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101099
  55. Lu, X., & Smith, R. (2021). Exploring the manifestation of distributed leadership in Chinese Higher Education. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 27(5), 1117-1135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1956598
  56. Lumby, J. (2019). Distributed leadership and bureaucracy. Educational Management and Leadership, 47(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217711190
  57. Mascall, B., Leithwood, K., Strauss, T., & Sacks, R. (2008). The relationship between distributed leadership and teachers’ academic optimism. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 214-228. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810863271
  58. MEB. (2024). Milli eğitim istatistikleri: Örgün eğitim 2023/2024. https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/www/icerik_goruntule.php?KNO=629#gallery-1 adresinden erişildi.
  59. Mockler, N. (2011). Beyond ‘what works’: Understanding teacher identity as a practical and political tool. Teachers and Teaching, 17(5), 517-528. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2011.602059
  60. Morrissey, M. S. (2000). Professional learning communities: An ongoing exploration. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, Austin, Texas.
  61. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/creating-effective-teaching-and-learning-environments_9789264068780-en.html adresinden erişildi.
  62. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2018). Overview: Teacher policies matter. In Effective Teacher Policies: Insights from PISA, 19-39. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  63. Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609
  64. Owen, S. (2014). Teacher professional learning communities: going beyond contrived collegiality toward challenging debate and collegial learning and professional growth. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 54(2), 54-77. https://hdl.handle.net/1959.8/159785
  65. Özdemir, M. (2012). Dağıtımcı liderlik envanterinin Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 4(4), 575-598. https://izlik.org/JA79JT79FR
  66. Özdemir, M., & Pektaş, V. (2017). Sosyal adalet liderliği ve okul akademik iyimserliği ilişkisinin öğretmen görüşlerine göre incelenmesi. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 18(2), 576-601. https://doi.org/10.12984/egeefd.328458
  67. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  68. Polatcan, M. (2021). An exploration of the relationship between distributed leadership, teacher agency, and professional learning in Turkey. Professional Development in Education, 50(4), 789-803. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1905050
  69. Popp, J. S., & Goldman, S. R. (2016). Knowledge building in teacher professional learning communities: Focus of meeting matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 347-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.06.007
  70. Qin, X., & Liu, S. (2023). The relationship between principal support, teacher professional identity, and teacher professional learning in China: Investigating gender differences. Psychology in the Schools, 60(12), 4871-4884. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23066
  71. Sargent, T. C., & Hannum, E. (2009). Doing more with less: Teacher professional learning communities in resource-constrained primary schools in rural China. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 258-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109337279
  72. Savaş, G. (2021). Öğretmenlerin mesleki öğrenmesi ile bazı bireysel ve örgütsel değişkenler arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
  73. Sevim, H. İ., & Kaya, A. (2022). Okullardaki dağıtımcı liderlik ile örgütsel mutluluk arasındaki ilişki. Uluslararası Liderlik Çalışmaları Dergisi: Kuram ve Uygulama, 5(2), 86-106. https://doi.org/10.52848/ijls.1094287
  74. Seyidoğlu, S. (2022). Öğretmen liderliği ve mesleki öğrenme arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi: Öğretmen öz yeterliliğinin aracılık rolü [Doktora tezi]. Harran Üniversitesi.
  75. Shah, M. A., & Campbell, C. (2023). A state-of-the-art review of Canadian literature on teacher professional learning and leadership (2010-2020). International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2023.2254732
  76. Singh, N., & Loh, S. C. (2024). Role of professional learning communities in improving teachers’ job satisfaction: why does trust in colleagues and emotional intelligence matter? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2024.2342293
  77. Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984678
  78. Sun, A., & Xia, J. (2018). Teacher-perceived distributed leadership, teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: A multilevel SEM approach using the 2013 TALIS data. International Journal of Educational Research, 92, 86-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.09.006
  79. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L.S. (2010). Using Multivariate Statistics (5.ed.). Pearson and Allyn & Bacon. TEDMEM. (2025). 2024 Eğitim değerlendirme raporu. https://www.tedmem.org/yayinlar-detay/2024-egitim-degerlendirme-raporu adresinden erişildi.
  80. Thien, L. M., & Chan, S. Y. (2022). One-size-fits-all? A cross-validation study of distributed leadership and teacher academic optimism. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(1), 43-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220926506
  81. Thien, L. M., Adams, D., & Koh, H. M. (2021). Nexus between distributed leadership, teacher academic optimism and teacher organisational commitment: A structural equation modelling analysis. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(4), 830-847. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-05-2020-0278
  82. Thien, L. M., Uthai, M., & Yeap, S. B. (2022). Does middle leaders’ learning-centred leadership matter in promoting teacher professional learning? A partial least squares analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221115522
  83. Timperley, H., & Alton-Lee, A. (2008). Reframing teacher professional learning: An alternative policy approach to strengthening valued outcomes for diverse learners. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 328-369. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07308968
  84. Timperley, H.S. (2005). Distributed leadership: developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(4), 395-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500038545
  85. Torres, D.G. (2018). Distributed leadership and teacher job satisfaction in Singapore. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(1), 127-142. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-12-2016-0140
  86. Vanlommel, K., van den Boom-Muilenburg, S. N., Thesingh, J., & Kikken, È. (2023). How a sense of collective efficacy influences teacher learning during change: the role of academic optimism and shared vision. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 8(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-03-2022-0018
  87. Weber, K. E., Hawlitschek, P., Richter, D., & Klusmann, U. (2023). Subjektive fortbildungsbedarfe von lehrkräften an schulen in herausfordernden lagen. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft. 27(2), 321-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-023-01208-1
  88. White, R. E., Cooper, K., & Ahmed, A. (2016). Canadian contexts in educational leadership: a hermeneutic approach to distributed leadership for teachers’ professional learning. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(6), 682–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2016.1210827
  89. Woltman, H., Feldstain, A., MacKay, J. C., & Rocchi, M. (2012). An introduction to hierarchical linear modeling. Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology, 8(1), 52-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p052
  90. World Bank (2022). The critical role of teachers in education. 26 Ocak 2023 tarihinde https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/teachers#1 adresinden erişildi.
  91. Wu, J.H., & Lin, CY. (2018). A multilevel analysis of teacher and school academic optimism in Taiwan elementary schools. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(1), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-017-9514-5
  92. Xu, S., Zhang, H., Dai, Y., Ma, J., & Lyu, L. (2021). Distributed leadership and new generation employees’ proactive behavior: Roles of idiosyncratic deals and meaningfulness of work. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.755513
  93. Yarıcı, T., & Özbaş, M. (2021). Okul yöneticilerinin eğitsel proje süreçlerine ilişkin görüşlerinin sosyal takas kuramı bağlamında incelenmesi. Journal Of Social, Humanities And Administrative Sciences, 7(38), 515-525. https://doi.org/10.31589/JOSHAS.562
  94. Yılmaz, D., & Turan, S. (2015). Dağıtılmış liderliğin okullardaki görünümü: Bir yapısal eşitlik modelleme çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 21(1), 93-126. https://doi.org/10.14527/kuey.2015.005