SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 32 Sayı: 6

A comparative acoustic analysis of 3D-printed drone propellers with different materials and manufacturing methods

Farklı malzemeler ve üretim yöntemleri kullanılarak 3B baskı ile üretilen drone pervanelerinin karşılaştırmalı akustik analizi

Umut Can Uzun, Ali Can Kaya

Pages
1191–1202
Publication Date
2026-10-08
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗

Abstract

This study presents a comparative acoustic analysis of drone propellers manufactured using different materials and additive manufacturing methods. A total of twelve propellers were produced with FFF (Fused filament fabrication) and MSLA (Masked Stereolithography) techniques, employing six different material types, including ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene), ASA (Acrylonitrile Styrene Acrylate), PETG (Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol), PLA (Polylactic Acid), Tough Resin and Water Wash Resin. All propellers were tested individually under the same conditions specific to the experimental setup and acoustic data were recorded using a microphone. Subsequently, various sound characteristics such as A-weighted sound pressure level (dB(A)), fluctuation strength, roughness and sharpness were analyzed using MATLAB. The results demonstrate that both the material and the printing method have a substantial influence on acoustic behavior. While FFF-printed propellers generally produced higher sound pressure levels, MSLA-printed ones tended to exhibit higher values in temporal modulation metrics such as fluctuation and roughness. Furthermore, materials with higher stiffness generally tended to exhibit lower overall loudness, fluctuation and roughness, whereas higher sharpness values were observed. The findings contribute to the understanding of how material selection and additive manufacturing methods influence noise emissions in drones, providing a perspective for future design optimizations.

Özet

Bu çalışma farklı malzemeler ve eklemeli üretim yöntemleri kullanılarak üretilen insansız hava aracı pervanelerinin karşılaştırmalı akustik analizini sunmaktadır. FFF (Eritilmiş filament üretimi) ve MSLA (Maskelenmiş stereolitografi) teknikleri kullanılarak ABS (Akrilonitril Bütadien Stiren), ASA (Akrilonitril Stiren Akrilat), PETG (Polietilen Tereftalat Glikol), PLA (Polilaktik Asit), tok reçine ve suda yıkanabilir reçine dahil olmak üzere altı farklı malzeme türü ile toplam on iki pervane üretilmiştir. Tüm pervaneler deney düzeneğine özgü standart koşullar altında ayrı ayrı test edildi ve akustik veriler mikrofon kullanılarak kaydedildi. Ardından, A-ağırlıklı ses basıncı seviyesi (dB(A)), dalgalanma, pürüzlülük ve keskinlik gibi çeşitli ses özellikleri MATLAB kullanılarak analiz edildi. Sonuçlar hem malzeme hem de baskı yönteminin akustik davranış üzerinde önemli bir etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. FFF ile basılmış pervaneler genellikle daha yüksek ses basıncı seviyeleri üretirken, MSLA ile basılmış pervaneler dalgalanma ve pürüzlülük gibi zamansal modülasyon ölçütlerinde daha yüksek değerler sergileme eğilimindeydi. Ayrıca, daha yüksek rijitliğe sahip malzemeler genel olarak daha düşük ses yüksekliği, dalgalanma ve pürüzlülük sergilerken keskinlik değerlerinin daha yüksek olduğu gözlemlenmiştir. Bu bulgular, malzeme seçimi ve eklemeli imalat tekniğinin insansız hava araçlarında gürültü emisyonlarını nasıl etkilediğinin anlaşılmasına katkıda bulunarak, gelecekteki tasarım optimizasyonları için bir perspektif oluşturmaktadır.

Keywords
🔖

Cite This Article

Uzun, U. C., Kaya, A. C. (2026). A comparative acoustic analysis of 3D-printed drone propellers with different materials and manufacturing methods. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 32 Sayı: 6, 1191–1202. https://doi.org/10.65206/pajes.83616

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

References (35)

  1. [1] Choudhari CM, Patil VD. “Product development and its comparative analysis by SLA, SLS and FDM rapid prototyping processes”. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 149(1), 012009, 2016.
  2. [2] Ergene B, Yalçın B. Investigation of mechanical performance of various cellular structures produced by fused deposition modeling (FDM). Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 38(1), 201–218, 2023.
  3. [3] Ergene B, Ispartalı H, Karakılınç U. "Impact behavior of PET-G parts produced by fused deposition modelling depending on layer height and test temperature". Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 38(3), 1345–1359, 2023.
  4. [4] Adin MŞ, Kam M. An Overview of Post-Processing of Fused Deposition Modelling 3D Printed Products. Editors: Malik VR, Tiwary VK, Padmakumar A. Post-Processing of Parts and Components Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modeling: Techniques and Advancements, 1–10, Boca Raton, USA, CRC Press, 2024.
  5. [5] International Organization for Standardization (ISO). “Additive Manufacturing-General Principles-Fundamentals and Vocabulary”. Geneva, Switzerland, ISO/ASTM 52900, 2021.
  6. [6] Yalçın B, Ergene B. “Metallurgy and method of new trend 3-D additive manufacturing in industry”. SDU International Journal of Technological Science, 9(3), 65–88, 2017.
  7. [7] Sculpteo. “The State of 3D Printing 2021”. https://info.sculpteo.com/hubfs/downloads/The%20State%20of%203D%20Printing%2021.pdf (27.12.2025).
  8. [8] Bolat Ç, Demircan F, Gür İ, Yalçın B, Şener R, Ercetin A. “Hardness and surface roughness of 3D-printed ASA components subjected to acetone vapor treatment and different production variables: a multi-estimation work via machine learning and deep learning”. Polymers, 17(21), 2881, 2025.
  9. [9] Tunalıoğlu MS, Ağca BV. “Wear and service life of 3-D printed polymeric gears”. Polymers, 14(10), 2064, 2022.
  10. [10] Valizadeh I, Tayyarian T, Weeger O. “Influence of process parameters on geometric and elasto-visco-plastic material properties in vat photopolymerization”. Additive Manufacturing, 72, 103641, 2023.
  11. [11] Labib NS, Brust MR, Danoy G, Bouvry P. “The rise of drones in Internet of Things: A survey on the evolution, prospects and challenges of unmanned aerial vehicles”. IEEE Access, 9, 115466-115487, 2021.
  12. [12] Chavez-Tolentino C, Li X, Siller HR, Sadat H. “Form Deviation And Surface Quality Of Additively Manufactured Propellers And Their Associated Acoustic And Aerodynamic Performance”. Research Square, 2023. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3185812/v1 (27.12.2025).
  13. [13] Popișter F, Goia HȘ, Ciudin P. “Influence of polymer surface roughness on noise emissions in 3D-printed UAV propellers”. Polymers, 17(8), 1015, 2025.
  14. [14] Torija Martinez AJ, Li Z. "Metrics for Assessing the Perception of Drone Noise". Forum Acusticum, Lyon, France, 7-11 December 2020.
  15. [15] García-Tíscar J, Quintero P, Ramírez FN, Cremades A. "Effect of popular additive manufacturing technologies on the performance and acoustics of UAV propellers". 34th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS 2024), Florence, Italy, 9–13 September 2024.
  16. [16] GrabCAD. “6-inch Diameter Propeller”. https://grabcad.com/library/6-inch-diameter-propeller-1 (27.12.2025).
  17. [17] Mwema FM, Akinlabi ET. Fused Deposition Modeling: Strategies for Quality Enhancement. 1ˢᵗ ed. Cham, Switzerland, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2020.
  18. [18] Ozkan D, Binal G, Erdogan G, Gulec A, Ozgurluk Y, Yilmaz SE, Karaoglanli AC. Recent Developments in Additive Manufacturing. Editors: Rajendrachari S. Practical Implementations of Additive Manufacturing Technologies, 1–21, Singapore, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd, 2023.
  19. [19] Dave HK, Patel ST. Introduction to Fused Deposition Modeling Based 3D Printing Process. Editors: Dave HK, Davim JP. Fused Deposition Modeling Based 3D Printing,1–21, Cham, Switzerland, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2021.
  20. [20] Celik E. Additive Manufacturing: Science and Technology. 2nd ed. Berlin, Germany, De Gruyter, 2025.
  21. [21] Demir S. "3B yazıcı ile Poli laktik asit (PLA) esaslı numune üretiminde yazıcı parametrelerinin sertlik üzerindeki etkisi". Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 30(2), 136-144, 2024.
  22. [22] Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B, Khorasani M. Additive Manufacturing Technologies. 3rd ed. Cham, Switzerland, Springer, 2021.
  23. [23] Youssef H, El-Hofy H, Ahmed M. Fundamentals of Additive Manufacturing: Principles, Technologies, and Applications. 1ˢᵗ ed. Boca Raton, USA, CRC Press, 2024.
  24. [24] Ackermann P. Computer und Musik: Eine Einführung in die digitale Klang- und Musikverarbeitung. 1ˢᵗ ed. Vienna, Austria, Springer-Verlag, 1991.
  25. [25] Willems WM, Wagner A, Stricker D. Schallschutz: Bauakustik: Grundlagen – Luftschallschutz - Trittschallschutz. 2nd ed. Wiesbaden, Germany, Springer Vieweg, 2020.
  26. [26] Böge A. Physik: Grundlagen, Versuche, Aufgaben, Lösungen. 8th ed. Braunschweig/Wiesbaden, Germany, Vieweg, 1993.
  27. [27] Schneider-Stickler B, Bigenzahn W. Stimmdiagnostik: Ein Leitfaden für die Praxis. 2nd ed. Vienna, Austria, Springer-Verlag Vienna New York, 2013.
  28. [28] Yoshida S. Fundamentals of Acoustic Waves and Applications. 1st ed. Cham, Switzerland, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2024.
  29. [29] Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR). “Potential health risks of exposure to noise from personal music players and mobile phones including a music playing function”. Health & Consumer Protection DG, Brussels, Belgium, Scenihr_o_018, 2008.
  30. [30] Tashev I. Sound Capture and Processing: Practical Approaches. 1st ed. Chichester, United Kingdom, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2009.
  31. [31] Jiang ZX, Xu DP, Park KT, Hwang SM. "Design and analysis of two-way microspeaker to enhance mid-frequency sound pressure level". Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 365, 114914, 2024.
  32. [32] Everest FA, Pohlmann KC. Master Handbook of Acoustics. 7th ed. USA, McGraw-Hill, 2022.
  33. [33] Gwak DY, Han D, Lee S. “Sound quality factors influencing annoyance from hovering UAV”. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 489, 115651, 2020.
  34. [34] Fastl H, Zwicker E. Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models. 3rd ed. Berlin, Germany, Springer-Verlag, 2007.
  35. [35] Asady H, Forouharmajd F, Pourabdian S, Jalali M, Ahmadi A, Ansari F, Fuente A. “Ear canal role and psychoacoustic parameters: loudness, sharpness, roughness, and fluctuation strength”. International Journal of Environmental Health Engineering, 14(2), 10, 2025.