Journals / Sosyal Güvence / 2026 / Sayı: 30

Examination of Just Transition Process in Automotive Industry in Terms of OHS

Otomotiv Sanayisinde Adil Geçiş Sürecinin İSG Açısından İrdelenmesi

Pages
2422–2451
Publication Date
2026-07-04
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, it is concluded that a sustainable transformation in terms of workers’ health and safety cannot be achieved unless the just transition is integrated with skills transformation, social dialogue, and preventive OHS policies, and concrete policy suggestions specific to the process are presented.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The green transformation, which encourages low-carbon production and consumption models on a global scale, is not only environmentally friendly but also brings about profound structural changes in labor processes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study demonstrates using the document analysis technique based on qualitative research methods that the green and digital transformation in the automotive industry is not merely a technical adaptation process in terms of OHS, but also a structural transformation with a strong social justice dimension.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, it is concluded that a sustainable transformation in terms of workers’ health and safety cannot be achieved unless the just transition is integrated with skills transformation, social dialogue, and preventive OHS policies, and concrete policy suggestions specific to the process are presented.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Adil geçiş · yeşil dönüşüm · otomotiv sanayi

Abstract

The green transformation, which encourages low-carbon production and consumption models on a global scale, is not only environmentally friendly but also brings about profound structural changes in labor processes. The automotive industry is one of the sectors where a comprehensive restructuring is experienced in production technologies, work organizations, and workforce structures with the transition from internal combustion engines to hybrid and then to battery electric vehicles. This transformation process also means the emergence of new and complex threats in terms of occupational health and safety (OHS). The concept of “just transition”, which aims to build a bridge between environmental sustainability and social justice, aims to reduce the social costs of this transformation. However, the lack of holistic policies that prioritize employee health often leads to the process progressing in a risky and unbalanced manner. This study demonstrates using the document analysis technique based on qualitative research methods that the green and digital transformation in the automotive industry is not merely a technical adaptation process in terms of OHS, but also a structural transformation with a strong social justice dimension. While the production of hybrid and battery electric vehicles, along with digitalization and automation, diversifies physical, chemical, ergonomic, and psychosocial risks, the examined national OHS policies and practices are found to be insufficient in comprehensively addressing these emerging risks. In this context, it is concluded that a sustainable transformation in terms of workers’ health and safety cannot be achieved unless the just transition is integrated with skills transformation, social dialogue, and preventive OHS policies, and concrete policy suggestions specific to the process are presented.

Özet

Küresel düzeyde düşük karbonlu üretim ve tüketim modellerini teşvik eden yeşil dönüşüm, sadece çevreci değil, aynı zamanda emek süreçlerinde de derin yapısal değişimleri beraberinde getirmektedir. Otomotiv sanayisi, içten yanmalı motorlardan hibrid sistemlere, oradan da tam elektrikli araçlara geçişle birlikte; üretim teknolojileri, iş organizasyonları ve işgücü yapılarında kapsamlı bir yeniden yapılanmanın yaşandığı sektörlerin başında gelmektedir. Bu dönüşüm süreci, iş sağlığı ve güvenliği (İSG) açısından da yeni ve karmaşık tehditlerin ortaya çıkması anlamına gelmektedir. Çevresel sürdürülebilirlik ile sosyal adalet arasında bir köprü kurmayı amaçlayan “adil geçiş” kavramı, bu dönüşümün toplumsal maliyetlerini azaltmayı hedeflemektedir. Ancak çalışan sağlığını önceleyen bütüncül politika eksiklikleri, sürecin birçok durumda riskli ve dengesiz biçimde ilerlemesine yol açmaktadır. Bu çalışma, otomotiv sanayisinde yeşil ve dijital dönüşümün İSG açısından yalnızca teknik bir uyum süreci değil, aynı zamanda sosyal adalet boyutu güçlü bir yapısal dönüşüm olduğunu nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden doküman analizi tekniğiyle ortaya koymaktadır. Hibrid ve tam elektrikli araç üretimi, dijitalleşme ve otomasyon; fiziksel, kimyasal, ergonomik ve psikososyal riskleri çeşitlendirirken, incelenen ulusal mevcut İSG politika ve uygulamalarının bu yeni riskleri bütüncül biçimde kapsamakta yetersiz kaldığı görülmektedir. Bu bağlamda adil geçişin, beceri dönüşümü, sosyal diyalog ve önleyici İSG politikalarıyla entegre edilmediği sürece çalışan sağlığı ve güvenliği açısından sürdürülebilir bir dönüşüm sağlamasının mümkün olmadığı sonucuna ulaşılmış ve sürece özgü somut politika önerileri sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Demir, A., Baş, H. (2026). Examination of Just Transition Process in Automotive Industry in Terms of OHS. Sosyal Güvence, Sayı: 30, 2422–2451. https://doi.org/10.21441/sosyalguvence.1854503

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

↗New Tab

References (63)

  1. Abram, S., Atkins, E., Dietzel, A., Jenkins, K., Kiamba, L., Kirshner, J., ... & Santos Ayllón, L. M. (2022). Just transition: A whole-systems approach to decarbonisation. Climate Policy, 22(8), 1033–1049.
  2. Amnesty International. (2019). Time to recharge: Corporate action and inaction to tackle abuses in the cobalt supply chain.
  3. Bispo, L. G. M., & Amaral, F. G. (2024). The impact of Industry 4.0 on occupational health and safety: A systematic literature review. Journal of Safety Research, 90, 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2024.04.009
  4. Bridle, J. (2020). Yeni karanlık çağ: Teknoloji ve geleceğin sonu. Metis Yayınları.
  5. CCOHS - Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety. (n.d.). Battery safety: High-voltage batteries in electric, hybrid, or plug-in hybrid vehicles. https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/safety_haz/battery-safety-high-voltage-batteries-in-electric-hybrid-or-plug-in-hybrid-vehicles.html
  6. Cha, J. M. (2017). A just transition: Why transitioning workers into a new clean energy economy should be at the center of climate change policies. Fordham Environmental Law Review, 29(2), 196–220.
  7. Cha, J. M. (2020). Just transition: Tools for protecting workers and their communities at risk of displacement due to climate policy. In Putting California on the High Road: A Jobs and Climate Action Plan for 2030 (pp. 149–175).
  8. Cumhurbaşkanlığı Dijital Dönüşüm Ofisi. (2020). Dijital Türkiye yol haritası. https://cbddo.gov.tr
  9. de Ruyter, A., Bentley, G., Hearne, D., Bailey, D., & Nielsen, B. (2024). A ‘just transition’ for workers in the automotive sector? Survey evidence from the West Midlands. Contemporary Social Science, 19(1–3), 199–222.
  10. Delina, L. L., & Sovacool, B. K. (2018). Of temporality and plurality: An epistemic and governance agenda for accelerating just transitions for energy access and sustainable development. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 34, 1–6.
  11. Demir, A. (2018). Endüstri 4.0’dan Eğitim 4.0’a değişen eğitim-öğretim paradigmaları. INCSOS - International Congress on Social Sciences, Turkish Studies.
  12. Demir, A. (2020). Türkiye’nin otomobili’nin GZFT analizi. ESAM Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1(1), 24–46.
  13. Demir, A. (2022). Hibrid, tam elektrikli ve yakıt hücreli araçlar trendi ve emniyet yükümlülüklerinin değerlendirilmesi. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 21(41), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.55071/ticaretfbd.1096211
  14. Demir, A., Öz, A., & Gümüş, M. (2017). Türkiye’de yerli marka motor ve otomobil üretim sürecinin değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Current Researches on Engineering, Science and Technology, 3(2), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.26579/jocrest-3.2.4
  15. Dupuis, M., Greer, I., Kirsch, A., Lechowski, G., Park, D., & Zimmermann, T. (2024). A just transition for auto workers? Negotiating the electric vehicle transition in Germany and North America. ILR Review, 77(5), 770–798.
  16. Dupuis, M., & Greer, I. (2021). Recentralizing industrial relations? Local unions and the politics of insourcing in three North American automakers. ILR Review, 75(4), 918–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939211015191
  17. Economy Middle East. (2025, January 23). Generative AI drives global app spending to $150 billion in 2024, up 13 percent: Report. https://economymiddleeast.com/news/generative-ai-drives-global-app-spending-to-150-billion-in-2024-up-13-percent-report/
  18. EPRS - European Parliamentary Research Service. (2025). Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace: Shaping the future of work (European Added Value Unit, PE 774.670). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2025/774670/EPRS_STU(2025)774670_EN.pdf
  19. EPRS. (2019). Economic impacts of artificial intelligence (AI). European Parliamentary Research Service.
  20. Erdem, E. (2016). Sanayi devriminin ardından Osmanlı sanayileşme hamleleri: Sanayi politikalarının dinamikleri ve zaafiyetleri. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 48, 17–44.
  21. Friedman, G. (2022, May 10). How Canada hopes to buy its way on to the factory floor of the EV revolution. Financial Post.
  22. Galgóczi, B. (2020). Just transition on the ground: Challenges and opportunities for social dialogue. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 26(4), 367–382.
  23. Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., Schwanen, T., & Sorrell, S. (2017). The socio-technical dynamics of low-carbon transitions. Joule, 1(3), 463–479.
  24. Görener, A., & Görener, Ö. (2012). Türk otomotiv sektörünün ülke ekonomisine katkıları ve geleceğe yönelik sektörel beklentiler. Journal of Yasar University, 3(10), 1213–1232.
  25. Haruna, M. M., Walter, L. F., & Aprajita, M. (2019). Impacts of climate change on outdoor workers and their safety: Some research priorities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(18).
  26. Harvey, S. M. (2018). Leave no worker behind: Will the just transition movement survive mainstream adoption? Earth Island Journal, 33(2), 37–41.
  27. Heffron, R. J. (2021). What is the “just transition”? Achieving a just transition to a low-carbon economy. Palgrave Macmillan.
  28. Hope, D. (2022). How technology can prevent workplace injuries. https://www.healthworkscollective.com/how-technology-can-prevent-workplace-injuries/
  29. ILO. (2019). Skills for a greener future: A global view based on 32 country studies. International Labour Office.
  30. ILO. (2021). Skills development in the time of COVID-19: Taking stock of the initial responses in technical and vocational training and education. International Labour Office.
  31. ILO. (2023). Just transition policy brief: Occupational safety and health in a just transition. International Labour Office.
  32. ILO - International Labour Organization. (2025). Revolutionizing health and safety: The role of AI and digitalization at work: World Day for Safety and Health at Work 2025. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/2025-04/ILO_Safeday25_Report_r8%2B%282%29%20FULL%20%281%29.pdf
  33. IndustriALL. (2024). Towards a just transition in the automotive industry. https://www.industriall-union.org/towards-a-just-transition-in-the-automotive-industry
  34. International Transport Forum. (2023). Adapting (to) automation: Transport workforce in transition. OECD Publishing. https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/adapting-automation-transport-workforce-transition.pdf
  35. Karagöz, K. (2021). Türkiye’de otomotiv sektörünün ekonomiye etkisi: Ekonometrik bir analiz. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(12), 126–143.
  36. Kocakaplan, Y., Doğan, Ş., Deviren, B., & Keskin, M. (2013). Correlations, hierarchies and networks of the world’s automotive companies. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 392(12), 2736–2774.
  37. Kiefer, M., Rodríguez-Guzmán, J., Watson, J., van Wendel de Joode, B., Mergler, D., & da Silva, A. S. (2016). Worker health and safety and climate change in the Americas: Issues and research needs. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 40, 192–197.
  38. Leonhard, G. (2020). Teknolojiye karşı insanlık. Siyah Kitap.
  39. Li, X., Hoseyni, S. M., & Cordiner, J. (2025). Process safety challenges in lithium-ion battery recycling. International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application, 8(2), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.22034/IJRRS.2025.8.2.3
  40. Luke, N. (2023). Just transition for all? Labor organizing in the energy sector beyond the loss of “jobs property”. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 113(1), 94–109.
  41. McCauley, D., & Heffron, R. (2018). Just transition: Integrating climate, energy and environmental justice. Energy Policy, 119, 1–7.
  42. Morena, E. (2018). Securing workers’ rights in the transition to a low-carbon world: The just transition concept and its evolution. In Routledge handbook of human rights and climate governance (pp. 292–298). Routledge.
  43. Nar, B. (2017). Endüstri 4.0 tamam. Peki ya Eğitim 4.0? http://www.egitimdeteknoloji.com
  44. Newell, P., & Mulvaney, D. (2013). The political economy of the ‘just transition’. The Geographical Journal, 179(2), 132–140.
  45. On İkinci Kalkınma Planı (2024–2028). https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/On-Ikinci-Kalkinma-Plani_2024-2028_11122023.pdf
  46. Pişkin, S. (2017). Otomotiv sektör raporu: Türkiye otomotiv sanayii rekabet gücü ve talep dinamikleri perspektifinde 2020 iç pazar beklentileri.
  47. Pollin, R., & Callaci, B. (2019). The economics of just transition: A framework for supporting fossil fuel-dependent workers and communities in the United States. Labor Studies Journal, 44(2), 93–138.
  48. Ragaglia, M., Bascetta, L., Rocco, P., & Zanchettin, A. M. (2014). Integration of perception, control and injury knowledge for safe human–robot interaction. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2014) (pp. 1196–1202). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2014.6907005
  49. Sabato, S., & Mandelli, M. (2024). Towards an EU framework for a just transition: Welfare policies and politics for the socio-ecological transition. European Political Science, 23(1), 14–26.
  50. Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı. (2019). Türkiye Sanayi ve Teknoloji Stratejisi 2023. https://www.sanayi.gov.tr/stratejibelgeleri
  51. Sareen, S., & Haarstad, H. (2018). Bridging socio-technical and justice aspects of sustainable energy transitions. Applied Energy, 228, 624–632.
  52. SBB. (2023). On İkinci Kalkınma Planı (2024–2028). T.C. Cumhurbaşkanlığı Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı.
  53. Siebel, T. M. (2022). Dijital dönüşüm: Kitlesel yok oluş çağında hayatta kalmak ve başarılı olmak. Paloma Yayınevi.
  54. Statista. (2022). Internet of Things (IoT) connected devices installed base worldwide from 2015 to 2025. https://www.statista.com/statistics/471264/iot-number-of-connected-devices-worldwide/
  55. Stevis, D., & Felli, R. (2015). Global labour unions and just transition to a green economy. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 15, 29–43.
  56. Stevis, D., & Felli, R. (2020). Planetary just transition? How inclusive and how just? Earth System Governance, 6, 100065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100065
  57. Ticaret Bakanlığı. (2021). Yeşil Mutabakat Eylem Planı. https://ticaret.gov.tr/yesilmutabakat
  58. Ulusal Yapay Zekâ Stratejisi 2021–2025. (2021). Cumhurbaşkanlığı Dijital Dönüşüm Ofisi. https://cbddo.gov.tr/SharedFolderServer/Genel/File/TR-UlusalYZStratejisi2021-2025.pdf
  59. UN Global Accelerator. (2023). Global accelerator on jobs and social protection for just transitions. https://unglobalaccelerator.org/sites/default/files/2023-05/Roadmap_Jobs%20and%20Just%20Transitions.pdf
  60. UNIDO. (2022). Industrial development report 2022: The future of industrialization in a post-pandemic world. United Nations Industrial Development Organization.
  61. Ülengin, F., Önsel, Ş., Aktaş, E., Kabak, Ö., & Özaydın, Ö. (2014). A decision support methodology to enhance the competitiveness of the Turkish automotive industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 234(3), 789–801.
  62. WEF. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. World Economic Forum. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2020.pdf
  63. Uzun Dönemli İklim Stratejisi. (n.d.). https://iklim.gov.tr/db/turkce/dokumanlar/turkiyenin--8230-3143-20250210095501.pdf