| Is There Any Difference Between Gonial Angle Values Measured on Digital Lateral Cephalograms and Orthopantomograms? | Demet KAYA | 72–76 |
| Comparison of Dentoskeletal Changes, Esthetic, and Functional Efficacy of Conventional and Novel Esthetic Twin Block Appliances among Class II Growing Patients: A Pilot Study | Tulika TRIPATHI,Navneet SINGH,Priyank RAI,Prateek GUPTA | 77–84 |
| Quantitative Comparison of Cephalogram and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Thickness of Maxillary Incisors | Diyang WEI,Lingyun ZHANG,Weiran Lİ,Yilin JIA | 85–91 |
| Low-Viscosity Resin Infiltration Efficacy on Postorthodontic White Spot Lesions: A Quantitative Light-Induced Fluorescence Evaluation | Yağmur Lena SEZİCİ,Hasan ÇINARCIK,Enver YETKİNER,Rengin ATTIN | 92–97 |
| Nahoum Index in Brachyfacial Patients: A Pilot Study | Chiara VOMPI,Roberto VERNUCCI,Ambra Maria COSTANTINI,Valentina MAZZOLI,Gabriella GALLUCCIO,Alessandro SILVESTRI | 98–102 |
| Evaluation of Dental Age in Individuals of Different Ages with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate | Emre CESUR,Can ARSLAN,Aslı PATIR MÜNEVVEROĞLU,Ayşe Tuba ALTUĞ | 103–109 |
| Buccolingual Inclination Effects of Self-Ligating and Conventional Premolar Brackets: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study | Sabahat YAZICIOĞLU,Abdullah Alper ÖZ,Nursel ARICI,Mete ÖZER,Selim ARICI | 110–114 |
| Bond Strength of Metal and Ceramic Brackets on Resin Nanoceramic Material With Different Surface Treatments | Mehmet KARA,Özgür DEMİR,Mehmet DOĞRU | 115–122 |
| Strategies for Managing the Risk of Mucogingival Changes During Impacted Maxillary Canine Treatment | Hakan EL,Neda STEFANOVIC,Juan Martin PALOMO,Leena PALOMO | 123–132 |
| Use of Laser Systems in Orthodontics | Kevser KURT DEMİRSOY,Gökmen KURT | 133–140 |
| Interview with Dr.Ravindra Nanda on Current Concepts in Orthodontics | Ravindra NANDA | 141–141 |