| The Role of Özal’s Discourse for Emdeddedness of Market Culture | Argun Akdoğan | 1–18 |
| Kutuplaşan Türkiye | Hakan M. KİRİŞ | 1–1 |
| The Local Impact of Transformation after 1980: A General Critique of Local Participation Mechanisms | Muharrem Güneş, Dr. Tan BAYKAL | 19–32 |
| Transformation or Marketization? A Discussion on Health Care Transformation Program in Turkey | Cem Ergun, Ayşe Dericioğulları Ergun | 33–54 |
| The Neo of Statism: The Effective State | Esra Ergüzeloğlu Kilim | 55–74 |
| An Unbearable Coalition between Financial Aristocracy and PettyBourgeoisie | Atilla Güney | 75–94 |
| An Analysis of Right to City: A Parallel Reading Essay between “The Experiences of Concentration Camp” and “Urbanization Experiences” | Murat Tek | 95–118 |
| Re-Conceptualization of Urban Regeneration Based on Turkish Experience | Murat Yaman | 119–128 |
| An Assessment on Political Philosophy of Jacques Ranciere | Z. Selin Keykubat, Hatice Koç | 129–142 |
| Cadre System Construction in Turkey as an Example of Policy Transfer | Aytül Güneşer Demirci | 143–168 |
| The United States’ Policy toward the Middle East in the Post-cold War Era: Hegemony or Leadership? | Radoslaw FİEDLER | 169–184 |
| 1929’dan Günümüze Devlet-Piyasa İlişkilerinin Dönüşümü Üzerine Düşünceler | Aziz KONUKMAN | 185–192 |
| Antalya Örneğinde Kent Kimliği | Arzu Erdinç | 193–198 |
| CHP’yi İktidara Gelmekten Alıkoyan | Hakan M. KİRİŞ, Hüseyin Gül | 199–202 |